(Q - McDonald's: does anything happen between the puzzles? Can you answer this question?)
MB : you have to understand it, what exactly does “things between the enigmas” mean?
(Q - McDonald's: so for example, if I take my order, there is the 530 which is followed by the 780, if the order is the correct one, at least the commonly accepted one, is- what finally, we can... you cornered me it's difficult to explain...)
MB : I'm going to give you a little time to think, it's my turn to you
ask a completely corollary question. You just told me the commonly accepted order, do you have an order of your own or are you basing yourself on the commonly accepted order?
(Q - McDonald's: so but since earlier I haven't been talking anymore because I'm paralyzed, because I immediately thought about this question from Max who said, it bothers me always tickled, but who said that he could only confirm the order of the first three riddles, so that suggested that perhaps the 580 did not follow the 470, in any case the first three he confirmed. once again, there you go again...)
MB : no but wait, wait, I'm not putting any diapers back on, do you have an order? Do you have an order for the puzzles? Is this an order that you found on your own or based on the commonly accepted order?
(Q - McDonald's: in all honesty I didn't find it myself, I remember doing the exercise again anyway and the order suited me.)
MB : does it suit you or are you sure?
(Q - McDonald's: but I'm going to do the test again straight away, I know that we all went back to B following your answer an hour ago, I sincerely mean it, I think that we all went back to B, which isn't any worse, we're all going to play again in order!)
MB : when you are a little initiated it goes even faster, to start again with B, to validate your concept, your solution, your answer to all that, it goes faster when you have already done it once, no ?
(Q - McDonald's: yes but I think that perhaps we need to start from scratch and do it... in fact that's a bit of a danger... yes, you're right in fact I think that there are a lot of primary decryptions, which we call primary decryptions, in any case essential today and which we have perhaps skimmed too much in trying to redo them, perhaps...)< /i>
MB : maybe not, no, no, I'm not saying that. What interests me is when you ask me questions, you ask me if something is happening between two enigmas, which is a cryptic question to say the least, to answer I have to understand exactly what that is. means. And there, point blank like that, I don't really understand what that means.
(Q - McDo: for example, let's imagine, there are not thousands of examples but let's imagine that between each enigma, you have to turn the card, this is an example of a quarter turn it's something between the puzzles, I was in 530 for example a north-south axis, when I arrive in 780 I rotate my map a quarter turn, and I could give other examples like that ,.)
MB : I understood the concept, azfo there was something else to comment on, to add to that?
(Q - azfo: there was Max Valentin so when we are in 780, we are supposed to be in Bourges, in 470 we are supposed to be in Roncesvaux. Some think that to go from Bourges to Roncesvaux, we made a change of direction somewhere, the famous CDD and Max Valentin said the change of direction takes place between the 780 and the 470. In other words where there is nothing, a no-man's land and between the enigmas at the end of (given that some researchers think there are things to do between the puzzles.)
MB : so we are once again on semantics here, we are addressing a literary person, so when a question like that is asked to you, moreover I reacted to the question by saying I would like to understand what that means between the puzzles, and here I am more or less consciously admitting the concept between the puzzles, with an example of rotating the card or something else, but I am admitting it because I am in an attitude which consists of answering and I think that he has nothing to answer.
I think it's, I think it's a notion... I'm going to clarify because I don't want you to think I'm making fun of you. I'm not making fun of you at all, I would say that if this notion of between the enigmas, admitting that the enigmas do not touch each other, therefore which is in a way that we can image as we wish, a space, an area, something between two enigmas, that's already a concept that must be admitted, and secondly, is there something happening there, that's a second concept.
And I'm not sure that it's worth wasting too much energy on these concepts, I think that here we are leaving the logical zone which consists of saying we have eleven riddles, we read eleven riddles, we decipher eleven riddles and we find the great solution.
After a card pivot, if there were to be a card pivot, it must necessarily be induced somewhere by something, a word, a visual element or something, you don't rotate your card for the pleasure of it. pivot, you pivot because something prompts you to do so. So does this happen between two enigmas or in an enigma? I think that here we are already attacking the cliff.
(Q - Azfo: Max Valentin said it's the riddles that directly dictate to you what you should do)
MB : well, I said it less well but I said it too. We always come back, I always reframe you on a logic that is yours, not the logic of a superman, not an extreme finesse which would mean that... no, no, there is no third dimension, ""everything is in the book", it's been a long time since I said it.
(Q - azfo: you know those from the A2CO for whom Max Valentin was a god..)
MB : I don't know them anyway, but there is a boy that I see once here, once elsewhere, who on the one hand says Becker doesn't have the right solutions anyway, and then when he comes on discord, he asks me lots of things, I don't see why he asks me. This is the perpetual paradox of this hunt, there are people who are a little bit variable, so in fact they are sure of nothing.
(Q - azfo: it was you who last time even mentioned HAL.)
MB : There are people who really don't like me at A2CO, what the hell are they saying to me. My name will be Crolet and I will sue them at the A2CO. It's not worth it and everyone can calm down when the time comes.
I am very old, but I would like to point out to you that it is 0:46 a.m. and that at that time, some time ago I was digging and I read on the forums that " "given his advanced age we
asks how Becker managed to dig"" so I wonder how I manage to answer you again at such an hour.
MB : you have to understand it, what exactly does “things between the enigmas” mean?
(Q - McDonald's: so for example, if I take my order, there is the 530 which is followed by the 780, if the order is the correct one, at least the commonly accepted one, is- what finally, we can... you cornered me it's difficult to explain...)
MB : I'm going to give you a little time to think, it's my turn to you
ask a completely corollary question. You just told me the commonly accepted order, do you have an order of your own or are you basing yourself on the commonly accepted order?
(Q - McDonald's: so but since earlier I haven't been talking anymore because I'm paralyzed, because I immediately thought about this question from Max who said, it bothers me always tickled, but who said that he could only confirm the order of the first three riddles, so that suggested that perhaps the 580 did not follow the 470, in any case the first three he confirmed. once again, there you go again...)
MB : no but wait, wait, I'm not putting any diapers back on, do you have an order? Do you have an order for the puzzles? Is this an order that you found on your own or based on the commonly accepted order?
(Q - McDonald's: in all honesty I didn't find it myself, I remember doing the exercise again anyway and the order suited me.)
MB : does it suit you or are you sure?
(Q - McDonald's: but I'm going to do the test again straight away, I know that we all went back to B following your answer an hour ago, I sincerely mean it, I think that we all went back to B, which isn't any worse, we're all going to play again in order!)
MB : when you are a little initiated it goes even faster, to start again with B, to validate your concept, your solution, your answer to all that, it goes faster when you have already done it once, no ?
(Q - McDonald's: yes but I think that perhaps we need to start from scratch and do it... in fact that's a bit of a danger... yes, you're right in fact I think that there are a lot of primary decryptions, which we call primary decryptions, in any case essential today and which we have perhaps skimmed too much in trying to redo them, perhaps...)< /i>
MB : maybe not, no, no, I'm not saying that. What interests me is when you ask me questions, you ask me if something is happening between two enigmas, which is a cryptic question to say the least, to answer I have to understand exactly what that is. means. And there, point blank like that, I don't really understand what that means.
(Q - McDo: for example, let's imagine, there are not thousands of examples but let's imagine that between each enigma, you have to turn the card, this is an example of a quarter turn it's something between the puzzles, I was in 530 for example a north-south axis, when I arrive in 780 I rotate my map a quarter turn, and I could give other examples like that ,.)
MB : I understood the concept, azfo there was something else to comment on, to add to that?
(Q - azfo: there was Max Valentin so when we are in 780, we are supposed to be in Bourges, in 470 we are supposed to be in Roncesvaux. Some think that to go from Bourges to Roncesvaux, we made a change of direction somewhere, the famous CDD and Max Valentin said the change of direction takes place between the 780 and the 470. In other words where there is nothing, a no-man's land and between the enigmas at the end of (given that some researchers think there are things to do between the puzzles.)
MB : so we are once again on semantics here, we are addressing a literary person, so when a question like that is asked to you, moreover I reacted to the question by saying I would like to understand what that means between the puzzles, and here I am more or less consciously admitting the concept between the puzzles, with an example of rotating the card or something else, but I am admitting it because I am in an attitude which consists of answering and I think that he has nothing to answer.
I think it's, I think it's a notion... I'm going to clarify because I don't want you to think I'm making fun of you. I'm not making fun of you at all, I would say that if this notion of between the enigmas, admitting that the enigmas do not touch each other, therefore which is in a way that we can image as we wish, a space, an area, something between two enigmas, that's already a concept that must be admitted, and secondly, is there something happening there, that's a second concept.
And I'm not sure that it's worth wasting too much energy on these concepts, I think that here we are leaving the logical zone which consists of saying we have eleven riddles, we read eleven riddles, we decipher eleven riddles and we find the great solution.
After a card pivot, if there were to be a card pivot, it must necessarily be induced somewhere by something, a word, a visual element or something, you don't rotate your card for the pleasure of it. pivot, you pivot because something prompts you to do so. So does this happen between two enigmas or in an enigma? I think that here we are already attacking the cliff.
(Q - Azfo: Max Valentin said it's the riddles that directly dictate to you what you should do)
MB : well, I said it less well but I said it too. We always come back, I always reframe you on a logic that is yours, not the logic of a superman, not an extreme finesse which would mean that... no, no, there is no third dimension, ""everything is in the book", it's been a long time since I said it.
(Q - azfo: you know those from the A2CO for whom Max Valentin was a god..)
MB : I don't know them anyway, but there is a boy that I see once here, once elsewhere, who on the one hand says Becker doesn't have the right solutions anyway, and then when he comes on discord, he asks me lots of things, I don't see why he asks me. This is the perpetual paradox of this hunt, there are people who are a little bit variable, so in fact they are sure of nothing.
(Q - azfo: it was you who last time even mentioned HAL.)
MB : There are people who really don't like me at A2CO, what the hell are they saying to me. My name will be Crolet and I will sue them at the A2CO. It's not worth it and everyone can calm down when the time comes.
I am very old, but I would like to point out to you that it is 0:46 a.m. and that at that time, some time ago I was digging and I read on the forums that " "given his advanced age we
asks how Becker managed to dig"" so I wonder how I manage to answer you again at such an hour.