(Q - mac do: everything is in the book, but everything written around the puzzles is not part of the game...)
MB : this is not written in the book, in the original edition, he wrote it after that...but let's go ahead, I'm not contradicting.
(Q - mac do: I'm thinking out loud, what could be left...)
MB : that is the question
(Q - mac do: ok we have a riddle, a visual, a title...)
MB : don't worry about it, I'm just saying everything is in the book, that can also mean that there are things that will appear to you when the time comes, that everyone has read, seen, but that no one has noticed, but the time will come, "everything is in the book".
(Q - apollo: is it "everything" that must be taken into consideration?)
MB : honestly when you are there...when you are going to approach the Super Solution that you are sure of your zone, that you are in the right zone where there are lots of things that you are going to capture.
(Q - apollo: is everything in the area?)
MB : everything is located in the area? that is to say I don't understand?
(Q - apollo: what do you call everything?)
MB : No, what I mean is that everything will appear much more clearly to you once you have your zone, everything that is in the book you will spot much more easily. There are things that you have read, that you have not noticed, but at that moment you will say to yourself ""ah yes, good god but it's of course!"", that's exactly it.
(Q - apollo: but is it with the card then?)
MB : everything is in the book, I'm not talking about the map.
(Q - ??: according to nlc who asked specific questions earlier, according to Mr Becker, there are certain words in the book which contain remainders)
MB : uh... not that no, I don't think there are any leftovers, you shouldn't obsess over the notion of leftovers, it's linked to the puzzles, but in the book there are elements which will appear to us as much brighter (it's not a clue, eh!), it will make sense. We will say yes, yes I understand why it is written like that, it will be done at the right time, you cannot hit before, if you do not have the right zone you cannot capture that.
(Q: It looks like you are drawing attention to some particular words in the riddles?)
MB : well if it seems like that it seems...I try by all means, without betraying the game, to give us the opportunity to reconsider things with a new eye.
(Q: In the new edition, there is a seal on the cover of the book, wouldn't that be a clue?)
MB : it's not a clue, it's a faithful reproduction of one of the seals on the sealed envelope, I have nothing to do with it, they were affixed before I intervened in the game, I don't know what that means.
MB talks to Archimedes who asks him about the secret word, telling him to relax....
(Q - niorflan: Michel compared to everything in the book there will surely be a lot of interpretation... could we imagine that we arrive at the super solution, we realizes that it is necessary to use something that is in the book but which was not in the 11 riddles?)
MB : no! but you will find certain sentences and you will say to yourself OK I understood... This is the "good god but it's of course" side.
(Q - ??: is this your book or all the editions?)
MB : all, in all books, including the next one. We can eliminate everything I added, it was already in the original edition so.....these are texts which were in the original edition and which are found in the following editions
(Q - olivier: regarding the debate on "everything is in the book" I checked the 2nd edition, on page 20, it is clearly specified that only are to be taken into consideration pages 22 to 43)
MB : so I skipped that, I've never seen that, are only pages 22 to 43 to be taken into consideration? In which edition? The 2nd is Hermé? Because he had already added things compared to the first one? But in any case what was in the first edition is found in all editions.
(Q - azfo: except Dabo, his mention was deleted in the 2nd version)
MB : I don't really know all the texts but in any case in all the editions there is everything I mention and everything that is necessary to solve the puzzles. after that he made additions, the 3rd edition with Lafon he added things. But what's interesting is everything that was in the 1st edition and which is found in all the other editions, so if there are things that were in the 1st edition and which are not found, it's because 'they don't matter much.
But hey, don't go off in all directions, frankly the elements that I mention are in all the books and you will find them when the time comes, you will find them when deciphering the Super Solution, everyone will understand the thing by saying to themselves " “ah yes obviously””. What was there and is no longer there is of no great importance.
(Q - ??: you just killed 4000 people in one go!)
MB : I killed no one, it was written from the start that everything is in the book, everything in the first book so everything that is in the 1st book and that is found in the others is part of the things that are to consider. Everything that was in the 1st book and not in the others is of no interest and vice versa, in relation to the puzzles.
(Q - niorflan: no but Michel there is a reference to Dabo in the 1st edition and you know well the tracks which pass through Dabo, so behind it, the interpretation which risks being made is is as you said that the reference to Dabo is not important, well that could mean that the passages in the puzzles by Dabo do not exist)
MB : but I never said that! I'm not implying that! I'm just saying what is in book number 1 which is no longer in number 2 is that it is not of great importance.
(Q - niorflan: I understood what you said but when the other owls reacted by saying that there were 10,000 people who were going to do I don't know what, they were referring to what I just told you but I agree with you that you didn't say that at all)
MB : I am in no way invalidating the Dabo track any more than I am validating it. I'm not stupid, I know that there are daboists and anti-daboists, I'm just saying that the texts which may have been deleted from the 1st edition are not of great importance. The truth is that he expanded the book because it wasn't many pages so he wrote a few pages about me, then he told stories of treasures at the end, but that's just filler, we don't is more into puzzles.
When I talk about texts that will impact you, these are things that are in all editions, when I talk to you about texts that are important it is in relation to the riddles and the solutions to the riddles. After there are things mentioned in a particular text that are not found in the other versions, I have no judgment on that, nothing at all and no comments to make. I'm just saying if the texts are no longer there, it's because the texts themselves don't matter, which means that if there is one that talks about Dabo, that doesn't matter. does not eliminate the Dabo track.
I'm clarifying because I'm fed up with having 8th degree interpretations. To my knowledge, the Dabo trail does not result from these texts which were removed but it results from work on the enigmas so I do not invalidate the work which was done on the enigmas and the results to which they lead .
(Q - olivier: just to come back to my question, in the 2nd edition we should only take into account pages 22 to 43, i.e. those of the enigmas, so we should only take into account these pages?)< /i>
MB : as part of solving the puzzles YES! as part of the little lights that will light up in your head, NO! But which will not bring you anything in terms of solving the puzzles or the Super Solution, but will allow you to say to yourself "ha yes, indeed I understand!"
MB : this is not written in the book, in the original edition, he wrote it after that...but let's go ahead, I'm not contradicting.
(Q - mac do: I'm thinking out loud, what could be left...)
MB : that is the question
(Q - mac do: ok we have a riddle, a visual, a title...)
MB : don't worry about it, I'm just saying everything is in the book, that can also mean that there are things that will appear to you when the time comes, that everyone has read, seen, but that no one has noticed, but the time will come, "everything is in the book".
(Q - apollo: is it "everything" that must be taken into consideration?)
MB : honestly when you are there...when you are going to approach the Super Solution that you are sure of your zone, that you are in the right zone where there are lots of things that you are going to capture.
(Q - apollo: is everything in the area?)
MB : everything is located in the area? that is to say I don't understand?
(Q - apollo: what do you call everything?)
MB : No, what I mean is that everything will appear much more clearly to you once you have your zone, everything that is in the book you will spot much more easily. There are things that you have read, that you have not noticed, but at that moment you will say to yourself ""ah yes, good god but it's of course!"", that's exactly it.
(Q - apollo: but is it with the card then?)
MB : everything is in the book, I'm not talking about the map.
(Q - ??: according to nlc who asked specific questions earlier, according to Mr Becker, there are certain words in the book which contain remainders)
MB : uh... not that no, I don't think there are any leftovers, you shouldn't obsess over the notion of leftovers, it's linked to the puzzles, but in the book there are elements which will appear to us as much brighter (it's not a clue, eh!), it will make sense. We will say yes, yes I understand why it is written like that, it will be done at the right time, you cannot hit before, if you do not have the right zone you cannot capture that.
(Q: It looks like you are drawing attention to some particular words in the riddles?)
MB : well if it seems like that it seems...I try by all means, without betraying the game, to give us the opportunity to reconsider things with a new eye.
(Q: In the new edition, there is a seal on the cover of the book, wouldn't that be a clue?)
MB : it's not a clue, it's a faithful reproduction of one of the seals on the sealed envelope, I have nothing to do with it, they were affixed before I intervened in the game, I don't know what that means.
MB talks to Archimedes who asks him about the secret word, telling him to relax....
(Q - niorflan: Michel compared to everything in the book there will surely be a lot of interpretation... could we imagine that we arrive at the super solution, we realizes that it is necessary to use something that is in the book but which was not in the 11 riddles?)
MB : no! but you will find certain sentences and you will say to yourself OK I understood... This is the "good god but it's of course" side.
(Q - ??: is this your book or all the editions?)
MB : all, in all books, including the next one. We can eliminate everything I added, it was already in the original edition so.....these are texts which were in the original edition and which are found in the following editions
(Q - olivier: regarding the debate on "everything is in the book" I checked the 2nd edition, on page 20, it is clearly specified that only are to be taken into consideration pages 22 to 43)
MB : so I skipped that, I've never seen that, are only pages 22 to 43 to be taken into consideration? In which edition? The 2nd is Hermé? Because he had already added things compared to the first one? But in any case what was in the first edition is found in all editions.
(Q - azfo: except Dabo, his mention was deleted in the 2nd version)
MB : I don't really know all the texts but in any case in all the editions there is everything I mention and everything that is necessary to solve the puzzles. after that he made additions, the 3rd edition with Lafon he added things. But what's interesting is everything that was in the 1st edition and which is found in all the other editions, so if there are things that were in the 1st edition and which are not found, it's because 'they don't matter much.
But hey, don't go off in all directions, frankly the elements that I mention are in all the books and you will find them when the time comes, you will find them when deciphering the Super Solution, everyone will understand the thing by saying to themselves " “ah yes obviously””. What was there and is no longer there is of no great importance.
(Q - ??: you just killed 4000 people in one go!)
MB : I killed no one, it was written from the start that everything is in the book, everything in the first book so everything that is in the 1st book and that is found in the others is part of the things that are to consider. Everything that was in the 1st book and not in the others is of no interest and vice versa, in relation to the puzzles.
(Q - niorflan: no but Michel there is a reference to Dabo in the 1st edition and you know well the tracks which pass through Dabo, so behind it, the interpretation which risks being made is is as you said that the reference to Dabo is not important, well that could mean that the passages in the puzzles by Dabo do not exist)
MB : but I never said that! I'm not implying that! I'm just saying what is in book number 1 which is no longer in number 2 is that it is not of great importance.
(Q - niorflan: I understood what you said but when the other owls reacted by saying that there were 10,000 people who were going to do I don't know what, they were referring to what I just told you but I agree with you that you didn't say that at all)
MB : I am in no way invalidating the Dabo track any more than I am validating it. I'm not stupid, I know that there are daboists and anti-daboists, I'm just saying that the texts which may have been deleted from the 1st edition are not of great importance. The truth is that he expanded the book because it wasn't many pages so he wrote a few pages about me, then he told stories of treasures at the end, but that's just filler, we don't is more into puzzles.
When I talk about texts that will impact you, these are things that are in all editions, when I talk to you about texts that are important it is in relation to the riddles and the solutions to the riddles. After there are things mentioned in a particular text that are not found in the other versions, I have no judgment on that, nothing at all and no comments to make. I'm just saying if the texts are no longer there, it's because the texts themselves don't matter, which means that if there is one that talks about Dabo, that doesn't matter. does not eliminate the Dabo track.
I'm clarifying because I'm fed up with having 8th degree interpretations. To my knowledge, the Dabo trail does not result from these texts which were removed but it results from work on the enigmas so I do not invalidate the work which was done on the enigmas and the results to which they lead .
(Q - olivier: just to come back to my question, in the 2nd edition we should only take into account pages 22 to 43, i.e. those of the enigmas, so we should only take into account these pages?)< /i>
MB : as part of solving the puzzles YES! as part of the little lights that will light up in your head, NO! But which will not bring you anything in terms of solving the puzzles or the Super Solution, but will allow you to say to yourself "ha yes, indeed I understand!"