(Q - ??: Michel is what we need to decipher first, or rather understand the numbers 71721075 or review the sentinels?)
MB : These are totally indiscreet questions for the organizer. I will never answer that.
(Q - ??: Max had said that it was necessary first...he had said that the review was the last thing to do in riddle 650 and that the two things were independent that the decryption of 71721075 was independent of the review...)
MB : you understand well why today I am, I take the opposite view from Max, it is that I do not agree with all of that.
Generally speaking, wait, I will still provide a clarification, I completely refuse to answer questions that draw parallels or establish a comparison between my proposals and those of Max Valentin. I am clear in what I say, I do not want to return to the story of Max Valentin, it has been 13 years since he died, he is a character who today is part of the history of the owl .
Me today I am in the present, in the concrete and in direct contact with you, so I debate my options, my words, but I refuse to spend my time justifying myself or commenting on comparisons between my words and those of Max Valentin.
The words of Max Valentin, today on a personal level I reject them en bloc, I strongly advise you to do the same thing, because they seem to me extremely likely to mislead you and I stop there, after that we cannot I'm not going to get into debates about what he said, you tell yourself that...
I know we don't say the same thing but I'm in the present.
MB : These are totally indiscreet questions for the organizer. I will never answer that.
(Q - ??: Max had said that it was necessary first...he had said that the review was the last thing to do in riddle 650 and that the two things were independent that the decryption of 71721075 was independent of the review...)
MB : you understand well why today I am, I take the opposite view from Max, it is that I do not agree with all of that.
Generally speaking, wait, I will still provide a clarification, I completely refuse to answer questions that draw parallels or establish a comparison between my proposals and those of Max Valentin. I am clear in what I say, I do not want to return to the story of Max Valentin, it has been 13 years since he died, he is a character who today is part of the history of the owl .
Me today I am in the present, in the concrete and in direct contact with you, so I debate my options, my words, but I refuse to spend my time justifying myself or commenting on comparisons between my words and those of Max Valentin.
The words of Max Valentin, today on a personal level I reject them en bloc, I strongly advise you to do the same thing, because they seem to me extremely likely to mislead you and I stop there, after that we cannot I'm not going to get into debates about what he said, you tell yourself that...
I know we don't say the same thing but I'm in the present.