(Q - Nabil: I am attached to a card and I have difficulty detaching myself from it and as they say that you can do that from your armchair...here I shoot an arrow and
I'm in trouble, I'm going for it)
MB : the map, whatever its scale, the map does not allow calculating a pile-up as in the field. To define the location on the ground is that on site, we cannot do it on a map. We can say it's there but not as precise as on the ground.
The card is useful until we enter the final trick and then it is no longer the card that is useful but its head, I understood the trick, it is like that, and then we do that on site and we dig and we find.
Tina tells me that I'm giving you heavy stuff, it's not heavy, what I'm giving you is instructions for use
(Q - Nabil: you know we interpret a lot, and when we find something, we say to ourselves that's it, but maybe we didn't go far enough, maybe too far, we do a lot of interpretation and that's why I just wanted to give a little reminder, because, for me, certain answers didn't actually speak to me and that to me..., I had the impression that It rather misguided me, because I interpret too much in fact....)
MB : the answers they can lead you to, there is a moment when I cannot...and I can even be led, depending on the questions that are asked, where I could be led or could be led to provide answers possibly cryptic because there are things I can't say. As I said, I can't invalidate...I said we shouldn't use madits anymore, I can't invalidate certain madits because I would deflower the game, I wouldn't do that now.
There are things that we cannot say...so far I am within an acceptable range of things that I can tell you, because you are in such demand, there have been so many convictions and, of ...there are always convictions which are asserted by people who are so sure of knowing, or who assert things about the unfolding of certain enigmas, about the way of understanding them, of putting them into practice or I don't know what. Others who continue to work on leftovers or things like that, there is so much extraneous information that I also make it a bit of a duty to maintain a direction in this game all the same.
Not everything is allowed and on the part of the organizer, I can't tell you everything and anything. The madits had this effect, because they are so vague to some. He talks about things, in particular I think about my paintings, there were a lot of disruptions with that, and I don't want to do that, I want researchers to look, I was going to say in the right direction, it's a a little excessive but that they seek in a coherent manner in relation to what the game is and that they do not go into delusions, whatever they may be!
It is in this spirit that I try to give a framework and a logic to the reasoning(s) that we must have.
MB : the map, whatever its scale, the map does not allow calculating a pile-up as in the field. To define the location on the ground is that on site, we cannot do it on a map. We can say it's there but not as precise as on the ground.
The card is useful until we enter the final trick and then it is no longer the card that is useful but its head, I understood the trick, it is like that, and then we do that on site and we dig and we find.
Tina tells me that I'm giving you heavy stuff, it's not heavy, what I'm giving you is instructions for use
(Q - Nabil: you know we interpret a lot, and when we find something, we say to ourselves that's it, but maybe we didn't go far enough, maybe too far, we do a lot of interpretation and that's why I just wanted to give a little reminder, because, for me, certain answers didn't actually speak to me and that to me..., I had the impression that It rather misguided me, because I interpret too much in fact....)
MB : the answers they can lead you to, there is a moment when I cannot...and I can even be led, depending on the questions that are asked, where I could be led or could be led to provide answers possibly cryptic because there are things I can't say. As I said, I can't invalidate...I said we shouldn't use madits anymore, I can't invalidate certain madits because I would deflower the game, I wouldn't do that now.
There are things that we cannot say...so far I am within an acceptable range of things that I can tell you, because you are in such demand, there have been so many convictions and, of ...there are always convictions which are asserted by people who are so sure of knowing, or who assert things about the unfolding of certain enigmas, about the way of understanding them, of putting them into practice or I don't know what. Others who continue to work on leftovers or things like that, there is so much extraneous information that I also make it a bit of a duty to maintain a direction in this game all the same.
Not everything is allowed and on the part of the organizer, I can't tell you everything and anything. The madits had this effect, because they are so vague to some. He talks about things, in particular I think about my paintings, there were a lot of disruptions with that, and I don't want to do that, I want researchers to look, I was going to say in the right direction, it's a a little excessive but that they seek in a coherent manner in relation to what the game is and that they do not go into delusions, whatever they may be!
It is in this spirit that I try to give a framework and a logic to the reasoning(s) that we must have.