(Q - pendulum: it is in relation to the question before, some say to me I know a rugby team which can bring down, implying the Saint-Martin terminals and like it;s
This is an element of heritage and we still have to be careful, I asked the question, if we put 100 people can we destroy heritage?)<
br />
MB : so if it is a question of testing if 100 people manage to bring down the Saint-Martin terminals, I wish you a lot of fun and I decline all responsibility, you will keep me informed of the result but I decline all responsibility [ laughter].
Seriously, we are in a subject that I find absurd, absurd, that exchanges could have reached this point, it frankly makes no sense. It's ridiculous, we're outside of hunting here, we're sure of the notions,...it's perverted, are the Sentinels big, very big, are they built, not built? , can we move them, demolish them. Well, I mean it doesn't make any more sense, we're getting into an endless debate, it's specious, it's just tongue-in-cheek, we're getting into a subject that is unacceptable. You shouldn't go in that direction, it's pointless.
MB : so if it is a question of testing if 100 people manage to bring down the Saint-Martin terminals, I wish you a lot of fun and I decline all responsibility, you will keep me informed of the result but I decline all responsibility [ laughter].
Seriously, we are in a subject that I find absurd, absurd, that exchanges could have reached this point, it frankly makes no sense. It's ridiculous, we're outside of hunting here, we're sure of the notions,...it's perverted, are the Sentinels big, very big, are they built, not built? , can we move them, demolish them. Well, I mean it doesn't make any more sense, we're getting into an endless debate, it's specious, it's just tongue-in-cheek, we're getting into a subject that is unacceptable. You shouldn't go in that direction, it's pointless.