(Q - BlackCorbac: Michel, speaking of confusion, in the game there are concepts, I'm not talking about puzzles, there are concepts of the game, is that possible?)
MB : what do you call the game concepts?
(Q - BlackCorbac: aperture, light in particular, can we address these questions here?)
MB : yes, yes of course we can approach it.
(Q - BlackCorbac: in riddle 470, in the classic resolution of the charade which is widely shared and he tells us that through the opening we will see the light and Max had said in his time, by a curse, and as you clearly told us to put them aside, but that we will see the light almost immediately, do you have a comment to make on this assertion?)
MB : frankly, very sincerely, I am completely, how am I going to say this, I want to laugh when I see, that, I say to myself but what can such an affirmation mean "we are going to see the light almost immediate"". There are some who will take 2 hours to understand and there are some who will take 2 years. Seeing the light in an immediate way is not an interesting criterion in relation to the resolution of enigmas, it is one of the big problems of madits, this way of bringing vocabulary, of commentary, on things which are are sufficiently defined in the riddles, as it is posed in the riddles, in my opinion it is more than sufficient, the more we add, the more we comment on it, we dissect it and the more we worry. If you understand right away it's immediate, if you take 2 days to understand it's not immediate.
MB : what do you call the game concepts?
(Q - BlackCorbac: aperture, light in particular, can we address these questions here?)
MB : yes, yes of course we can approach it.
(Q - BlackCorbac: in riddle 470, in the classic resolution of the charade which is widely shared and he tells us that through the opening we will see the light and Max had said in his time, by a curse, and as you clearly told us to put them aside, but that we will see the light almost immediately, do you have a comment to make on this assertion?)
MB : frankly, very sincerely, I am completely, how am I going to say this, I want to laugh when I see, that, I say to myself but what can such an affirmation mean "we are going to see the light almost immediate"". There are some who will take 2 hours to understand and there are some who will take 2 years. Seeing the light in an immediate way is not an interesting criterion in relation to the resolution of enigmas, it is one of the big problems of madits, this way of bringing vocabulary, of commentary, on things which are are sufficiently defined in the riddles, as it is posed in the riddles, in my opinion it is more than sufficient, the more we add, the more we comment on it, we dissect it and the more we worry. If you understand right away it's immediate, if you take 2 days to understand it's not immediate.