(Q - ??: overlap between current hunt and that of Father Méhus, I went to Vezelay and in Father Méhus, we clearly read Léon so that still removes a big ambiguity)
MB : for example not far from the Arcachon Bay there is Léon too, or elsewhere but it is not an indicator it is just to tell you that you should not draw hasty conclusions.
(Q - ??: yes but Vézelay isn't called Léon?)
MB : agree but Léon is not the panacea.
(Q - ??: same, he doesn't talk about Albion, he says back to the north?)
MB : yes, yes, but all that is semantic work, it's a choice of vocabulary.
(Q - ??: in the understanding part of the current hunt it removes an ambiguity, an interpretation which could be unfortunate)
MB : so much the better if that’s the case.
MB : for example not far from the Arcachon Bay there is Léon too, or elsewhere but it is not an indicator it is just to tell you that you should not draw hasty conclusions.
(Q - ??: yes but Vézelay isn't called Léon?)
MB : agree but Léon is not the panacea.
(Q - ??: same, he doesn't talk about Albion, he says back to the north?)
MB : yes, yes, but all that is semantic work, it's a choice of vocabulary.
(Q - ??: in the understanding part of the current hunt it removes an ambiguity, an interpretation which could be unfortunate)
MB : so much the better if that’s the case.