(Q - ??: everything is in the book including additional instructions?)
MB : no. when he says it's all in the book, he's talking about the 1st edition with text before the puzzles, photo elements and treasure stories. When Régis Hauser put this together, you should know that he was a methodical, meticulous person and that he put into the writing of this work everything he had imagined about this hunt and everything he considered as interesting, necessary, in addition to the puzzles, then it was cluttered and bothered by the place of the visuals and he sought to limit as much as possible the impact that Michel Becker could have on the hunt, so he eliminated his story, " "nothing to find, the pages that count are from so to so, don't bother me with Becker and others"", everything else has been pruned, so we are in a personal approach which reacted to the situation around the game.
That said, in all the elements that appear in the first book, there are moments where he had integrated certain things, where he had included certain things as being winks, more than a wink, as being elements of confirmation, elements which could impact when the time came in the mind of the player who could say with that, actually I understand better why he wrote it like that, it becomes obvious I understand. There really is something like that and it's not the texts of the riddles.
So when we come out of the 11 puzzles with a zone, we inevitably have the mind that will take all that and go, ha yes that's it! I understand OK I get it, it will be formatted in one go, it can't be clearer but it has nothing to do with the progression of the 11 puzzles but at the end it will appear... These elements are in the latest version released!!! They are in all editions and the next one! On the other hand, it's completely useless to search because you can't find anything, it can only appear if you have the right area!
(Q - ??: each researcher has their own area, everyone will screen their area...)
MB : that's good, but it's just another way of putting things into perspective, if we've been stuck in trouble for several years, it's not the right approach so we have to put all of that into perspective and put it back into perspective. that in perspective. Lots of things that he is starting to understand....He feels that he is greatly disturbing us,...no interest a priori but who we talk about a lot unnecessarily but who we make talk...We must not let him we think that Max Valentin was a "trickster?", but what he did showed a lot of cleverness and there are moments and particularly in the book it is his literary side, and there has sentences, when the time comes which will have a meaning different from that which is generally attributed to it. But it won't appear until we're almost on the spot. It's at the moment when we're flirting with the right Super Solution, that's when we'll say to ourselves that's it, there are lots of things that I understand.
Isidore mentions the "treasure is there for you or for Eternity) and Michel Becker reacts by speaking of the nickname "bluelilas" asks him lots of questions about Eternity but he doesn't know what to answer... he says that it’s poetry.
Note: he did not say that the remainders were clear in the enigmas, but these words take on a different meaning which supports the approach..."
MB : no. when he says it's all in the book, he's talking about the 1st edition with text before the puzzles, photo elements and treasure stories. When Régis Hauser put this together, you should know that he was a methodical, meticulous person and that he put into the writing of this work everything he had imagined about this hunt and everything he considered as interesting, necessary, in addition to the puzzles, then it was cluttered and bothered by the place of the visuals and he sought to limit as much as possible the impact that Michel Becker could have on the hunt, so he eliminated his story, " "nothing to find, the pages that count are from so to so, don't bother me with Becker and others"", everything else has been pruned, so we are in a personal approach which reacted to the situation around the game.
That said, in all the elements that appear in the first book, there are moments where he had integrated certain things, where he had included certain things as being winks, more than a wink, as being elements of confirmation, elements which could impact when the time came in the mind of the player who could say with that, actually I understand better why he wrote it like that, it becomes obvious I understand. There really is something like that and it's not the texts of the riddles.
So when we come out of the 11 puzzles with a zone, we inevitably have the mind that will take all that and go, ha yes that's it! I understand OK I get it, it will be formatted in one go, it can't be clearer but it has nothing to do with the progression of the 11 puzzles but at the end it will appear... These elements are in the latest version released!!! They are in all editions and the next one! On the other hand, it's completely useless to search because you can't find anything, it can only appear if you have the right area!
(Q - ??: each researcher has their own area, everyone will screen their area...)
MB : that's good, but it's just another way of putting things into perspective, if we've been stuck in trouble for several years, it's not the right approach so we have to put all of that into perspective and put it back into perspective. that in perspective. Lots of things that he is starting to understand....He feels that he is greatly disturbing us,...no interest a priori but who we talk about a lot unnecessarily but who we make talk...We must not let him we think that Max Valentin was a "trickster?", but what he did showed a lot of cleverness and there are moments and particularly in the book it is his literary side, and there has sentences, when the time comes which will have a meaning different from that which is generally attributed to it. But it won't appear until we're almost on the spot. It's at the moment when we're flirting with the right Super Solution, that's when we'll say to ourselves that's it, there are lots of things that I understand.
Isidore mentions the "treasure is there for you or for Eternity) and Michel Becker reacts by speaking of the nickname "bluelilas" asks him lots of questions about Eternity but he doesn't know what to answer... he says that it’s poetry.
Note: he did not say that the remainders were clear in the enigmas, but these words take on a different meaning which supports the approach..."