17/08/2022 - Enregistrement n° 39 - part 1 - 01:09:50:650 - Digits 71721075 - Decoding or decryption
(Q - nlc: obviously the numbers 71721075 of the 650 are of no use then because if you haven't seen the decryption and apparently it's not that difficult to understand...)
MB : wait, the numbers are useless???
(Q - nlc: earlier I asked you if the decryption had you already seen it somewhere and you answered no, and obviously it does not interfere with this notion of Change of gear for not having understood or deciphered these figures?)
MB : but tell me dear friend, is decryption the only answer you give to a riddle? You assert things, you work like that, you assert things to me and you try to get an answer from me, you said that there was no decryption, you deduce that there is no decryption .
(Q - nlc: not at all that's not what I said, you said in a previous voice that the figures of the 650 visual were deciphered and here later I will tell you I asked the question have you ever seen somewhere the good resolution, the good decryption of these figures and you answered no...)
MB : I never said the numbers for the 650 are decipherable, I never said it like that. I said you understand them, you interpret them, you decipher them, I have never been as categorical as you.
(Q - nlc: I will find the voice reference for you, it was Kiba who explained to you the difference between decryption and decoding, decoding we have the key, we apply it we find the result in clear and the decryption is that we don't have the key so we try to break the code, to understand what the number means for example, and you said we don't have the key it's a decryption to do)
MB : I don't remember being so categorical, I thank you for reminding me because if that is the case and I was so affirmative, I will be very happy to make amends.
MB : wait, the numbers are useless???
(Q - nlc: earlier I asked you if the decryption had you already seen it somewhere and you answered no, and obviously it does not interfere with this notion of Change of gear for not having understood or deciphered these figures?)
MB : but tell me dear friend, is decryption the only answer you give to a riddle? You assert things, you work like that, you assert things to me and you try to get an answer from me, you said that there was no decryption, you deduce that there is no decryption .
(Q - nlc: not at all that's not what I said, you said in a previous voice that the figures of the 650 visual were deciphered and here later I will tell you I asked the question have you ever seen somewhere the good resolution, the good decryption of these figures and you answered no...)
MB : I never said the numbers for the 650 are decipherable, I never said it like that. I said you understand them, you interpret them, you decipher them, I have never been as categorical as you.
(Q - nlc: I will find the voice reference for you, it was Kiba who explained to you the difference between decryption and decoding, decoding we have the key, we apply it we find the result in clear and the decryption is that we don't have the key so we try to break the code, to understand what the number means for example, and you said we don't have the key it's a decryption to do)
MB : I don't remember being so categorical, I thank you for reminding me because if that is the case and I was so affirmative, I will be very happy to make amends.