(Q - ??: do you accept the word pedestrian? Does a pedestrian exist? Max Valentin validated these expressions in the madits)<
br />
MB : he sees clearly where the researcher is coming from, he painted a pedestrian it's obvious, a character, we see it - horses, a stagecoach or I don't know what, but the use that Max made of it in the cursed ones are his business.
As for the concept of pile-up, what I demolish are the concepts which distort the game. This term pile-up does not mislead the game.
(Q - ??: he thinks that pile-on is what's left of the solutions)
MB : no, no you are on the wrong track - French expression, it is correct, precise, it simply means that the point to find is very precise, it does not go further than that.
(Q - ??: you say that the curses have no meaning but Max Valentin, he repeats several times that there would be a tiny clue to the one with the Super Solution)
MB : the hunt is sufficient in itself, we know what was requested in the Specifications - The curses are more likely to mislead the researcher.
MB : he sees clearly where the researcher is coming from, he painted a pedestrian it's obvious, a character, we see it - horses, a stagecoach or I don't know what, but the use that Max made of it in the cursed ones are his business.
As for the concept of pile-up, what I demolish are the concepts which distort the game. This term pile-up does not mislead the game.
(Q - ??: he thinks that pile-on is what's left of the solutions)
MB : no, no you are on the wrong track - French expression, it is correct, precise, it simply means that the point to find is very precise, it does not go further than that.
(Q - ??: you say that the curses have no meaning but Max Valentin, he repeats several times that there would be a tiny clue to the one with the Super Solution)
MB : the hunt is sufficient in itself, we know what was requested in the Specifications - The curses are more likely to mislead the researcher.