(Q - ??: on the passage keys it creates an unspeakable mess in my hunt, because I don't see how it can work, for example the 500 to trace the orthogonal you have to know some
points before and therefore a key, the A=0 of the 600...?)
MB : When we learn to read, we learn the "a"", the "b"" then we learn to make words, that's exactly the riddles, apart from 2, which require, if we want a passage key or which require knowing the previous one to decipher the next one, we will call it the "e" in water, you see what I mean the letters are connected, we stay on the alphabet it is a bit like this example but everything is logical, except that when we refer (and he returns to the contribution of semio-pragmatics) to the terms of the master of the game, from the moment he says there is a key to passage all the world takes it as such, ditto relics,....researchers have been conditioned by all these terms and for them to move away from this notion of relics to a simple notion of logic and sequence from one enigma to another.< br />
MB : When we learn to read, we learn the "a"", the "b"" then we learn to make words, that's exactly the riddles, apart from 2, which require, if we want a passage key or which require knowing the previous one to decipher the next one, we will call it the "e" in water, you see what I mean the letters are connected, we stay on the alphabet it is a bit like this example but everything is logical, except that when we refer (and he returns to the contribution of semio-pragmatics) to the terms of the master of the game, from the moment he says there is a key to passage all the world takes it as such, ditto relics,....researchers have been conditioned by all these terms and for them to move away from this notion of relics to a simple notion of logic and sequence from one enigma to another.< br />