(Q - fab4949: let's admit that I consider that I have solved, let's say 80 to 90%, I notice that there are elements that are wrong for me in my game in terms of the tables, the puzzles, is-
what you may have read somewhere that outside help was welcome to put us back on the right path, apart from you, from Max Valentin but outside help whether it be a character or an element...)
MB : I'm not sure I understand your question, tell me more?
(Q - fab4949: let's admit that I consider that I have solved a good part of the puzzles, that I do not understand the coherence of the game, is there an external element...)
MB : okay, you think you have found the solutions to the puzzles and you can't do anything with them, there is no coherence.
(Q - fab4949: yes and no, because in fact the coherence gives me an external element to find, which does not concern the book at all, there may be a link with my 2nd question, for example I land, not in an area since if I understood correctly, I don't delimit it in this way either, it is in relation to the content, of what I find there, which reminds me of elements of the book so not necessarily solutions, not necessarily tables but more methods used, in relation to what I see there, not necessarily in relation to deductions, more by the experience of resolution puzzles, but not necessarily the resolution of the puzzles itself, so my first question is is there any external help that could tell us, put us back on the right path to find coherence in the end. and the 2nd question, so if I cannot delimit the zone, if I cannot necessarily deduce a potatooid zone, does the content confirm to me the fact that I am not that far)
MB : how long have you been searching without indiscretion? [15 years old] Can I ask you a question in turn? What do you expect from the exchange we are currently having, from your arrival on the discord?
(Q - fab4949: well I tell myself that you have, you say you have seen the solutions, I listened to the other voices, I do not expect specific help but I expect no longer have your reasoning on my questions in the sense that you could tell me that I have everything wrong, so I'm starting from scratch)
MB : Some clarifications possibly? I'm going to ask you a second question, you'll see, I'm a bit of a coward too, but ultimately it's a bit of the usual practice in these exchanges? What conclusion do you draw from the comparison of your exchanges on A2CO and on Discord?
(Q - fab4949: the comparison between the two is a difficult question...you would have to spend a lot of hours a day on it when I see the number of posts at the moment)
MB : I will help you. Do you consider that in the climate that reigns on the different forums, there is an interest in making comparisons, in taking the temperature almost everywhere or do you consider that there is evidence for you who would make one side more interesting than the other?
(Q - fab4949: I consider that a lot of work has already been done on lachouette.net, on the A2CO, in the sense that there are contributions available, a lot of things, the discord that still remains new)
MB : I try to understand, for people who go elsewhere to say something else, I try to understand what their logic is.
(Q - fab4949: we are all missing something since no one has dug up the owl, we each have our own game and our interest after 29 years it is not to dig it up at all price, it is perhaps to understand in our own game why I did not succeed, why I feel close and in the end I am always missing something It is the logic of listening to you)<. /u>
MB : it's completely logical indeed, what I was trying to highlight a little is that if you take an antibiotic type treatment and you are told not to combine it with such and such other medication and if you combine However, you risk attenuating the effect of the treatment or even annihilating it. That's a bit of the feeling I have between the different forums, at some point you have to vote, I'm going this way or I'm going the other. On the one hand, we can't listen or follow, I'm going there, on the A2CO website where they come here and everyone knows what's going on, but we can't follow the two, we can not listen to a message and its opposite. At some point we form an opinion.
(Q - fab4949: my first question when I spoke about external help, it was about, for example, a historical character, an object, which serves me a bit as a trigger to connect the 'all of the riddles between them, that it tells me a story, that it doesn't take me to the right, to the left,... for me there are errors and it's not the tables, the riddles that will help me to solve them, I have to find something external and from the moment I did that...)
MB : when you talk about error, in the puzzles? in the elements of hunting?
(Q - fab4949: not really errors, these are things that are known to many owls, things that we did not understand over the course of the puzzles and at one point given we don't go any further) MB : I try to understand, for people who go elsewhere to say something else, I try to understand what their logic is for moving forward..)< /u>
MB : I don't know how to do Tompoucex's voice but I would tell you that "everything is in the book", so no external elements which would be a sort of martingale to shed light on everything else, no.
MB : I'm not sure I understand your question, tell me more?
(Q - fab4949: let's admit that I consider that I have solved a good part of the puzzles, that I do not understand the coherence of the game, is there an external element...)
MB : okay, you think you have found the solutions to the puzzles and you can't do anything with them, there is no coherence.
(Q - fab4949: yes and no, because in fact the coherence gives me an external element to find, which does not concern the book at all, there may be a link with my 2nd question, for example I land, not in an area since if I understood correctly, I don't delimit it in this way either, it is in relation to the content, of what I find there, which reminds me of elements of the book so not necessarily solutions, not necessarily tables but more methods used, in relation to what I see there, not necessarily in relation to deductions, more by the experience of resolution puzzles, but not necessarily the resolution of the puzzles itself, so my first question is is there any external help that could tell us, put us back on the right path to find coherence in the end. and the 2nd question, so if I cannot delimit the zone, if I cannot necessarily deduce a potatooid zone, does the content confirm to me the fact that I am not that far)
MB : how long have you been searching without indiscretion? [15 years old] Can I ask you a question in turn? What do you expect from the exchange we are currently having, from your arrival on the discord?
(Q - fab4949: well I tell myself that you have, you say you have seen the solutions, I listened to the other voices, I do not expect specific help but I expect no longer have your reasoning on my questions in the sense that you could tell me that I have everything wrong, so I'm starting from scratch)
MB : Some clarifications possibly? I'm going to ask you a second question, you'll see, I'm a bit of a coward too, but ultimately it's a bit of the usual practice in these exchanges? What conclusion do you draw from the comparison of your exchanges on A2CO and on Discord?
(Q - fab4949: the comparison between the two is a difficult question...you would have to spend a lot of hours a day on it when I see the number of posts at the moment)
MB : I will help you. Do you consider that in the climate that reigns on the different forums, there is an interest in making comparisons, in taking the temperature almost everywhere or do you consider that there is evidence for you who would make one side more interesting than the other?
(Q - fab4949: I consider that a lot of work has already been done on lachouette.net, on the A2CO, in the sense that there are contributions available, a lot of things, the discord that still remains new)
MB : I try to understand, for people who go elsewhere to say something else, I try to understand what their logic is.
(Q - fab4949: we are all missing something since no one has dug up the owl, we each have our own game and our interest after 29 years it is not to dig it up at all price, it is perhaps to understand in our own game why I did not succeed, why I feel close and in the end I am always missing something It is the logic of listening to you)<. /u>
MB : it's completely logical indeed, what I was trying to highlight a little is that if you take an antibiotic type treatment and you are told not to combine it with such and such other medication and if you combine However, you risk attenuating the effect of the treatment or even annihilating it. That's a bit of the feeling I have between the different forums, at some point you have to vote, I'm going this way or I'm going the other. On the one hand, we can't listen or follow, I'm going there, on the A2CO website where they come here and everyone knows what's going on, but we can't follow the two, we can not listen to a message and its opposite. At some point we form an opinion.
(Q - fab4949: my first question when I spoke about external help, it was about, for example, a historical character, an object, which serves me a bit as a trigger to connect the 'all of the riddles between them, that it tells me a story, that it doesn't take me to the right, to the left,... for me there are errors and it's not the tables, the riddles that will help me to solve them, I have to find something external and from the moment I did that...)
MB : when you talk about error, in the puzzles? in the elements of hunting?
(Q - fab4949: not really errors, these are things that are known to many owls, things that we did not understand over the course of the puzzles and at one point given we don't go any further) MB : I try to understand, for people who go elsewhere to say something else, I try to understand what their logic is for moving forward..)< /u>
MB : I don't know how to do Tompoucex's voice but I would tell you that "everything is in the book", so no external elements which would be a sort of martingale to shed light on everything else, no.