(Q - orestes: imagine that he asks him a riddle, he asks him to find an equilateral triangle on a map. We can think of either connecting 3 equidistant points on the map, from 3 cities
, or in a more imagined way, we imagine an abbey for example with a monk who would have worked for a long time on equilateral triangles and we associate him with the abbey and the equilateral triangle If we are now ultimately told the solution c.
was a right triangle, there is a right angle here, we would not agree we would find it incongruous, equilateral it cannot be right angle at the same time)
MB : answers that it is misleading yes.
(Q - Orestes: he wants to talk about a madit on the subject of the spiral with 4 centers, if it is specified at 4 centers it is because there is a reason that it is find where the trace, it is with 4 centers in preference to any other spiral, we must find something which clearly refers to a spiral with 4 centers, and not another spiral like the projection of a road which goes up a hill which 'we would project on a map but which is not a Spiral with 4 centers, so We are still talking about a Spiral with 4 centers, of a mathematically well defined object?)/u>
MB : we are talking about a spiral with 4 centers, an absolutely mathematically well-defined object.
MB : answers that it is misleading yes.
(Q - Orestes: he wants to talk about a madit on the subject of the spiral with 4 centers, if it is specified at 4 centers it is because there is a reason that it is find where the trace, it is with 4 centers in preference to any other spiral, we must find something which clearly refers to a spiral with 4 centers, and not another spiral like the projection of a road which goes up a hill which 'we would project on a map but which is not a Spiral with 4 centers, so We are still talking about a Spiral with 4 centers, of a mathematically well defined object?)/u>
MB : we are talking about a spiral with 4 centers, an absolutely mathematically well-defined object.