MB : When he hears, for example, theories from the tenors of discord, good evening tompoucex, we heard you, Isidore, people who make great theories, great reasoning who explain things with anagrams, common sense is
the meaning of the misinterpretation and vice versa and I start again, at some point you have to stop because there is no end to these stories.
At some point you have to stop and go back to much more basic information and stay within the framework of the book, that's what's interesting to think about, everything is in the book.
so from the moment its part really far, it is likely that it goes too far.
(Q: the question of the South as a general direction, it's not that it goes far, but it really sends us into the wall if ultimately there as it defines a general direction, if in the end we arrives southwest, this south direction was not of much use to us, on the other hand if Max Valentin wandered us a little on the fact that south was a general direction, in this case south is of importance and we integrate it into our hunt and it's a completely different way of approaching these enigmas and...)
MB : SOUTH is what you deduce from the book? well use it first and you will see later, start there, you should not immediately start with considerations which are linked to the impression produced in the mass of madits, that makes the madits have an effect
.
And those who know all this by heart are even more lost than the others.
You have to stay in the game
(Q: the question of the South as a general direction, it's not that it goes far, but it really sends us into the wall if ultimately there as it defines a general direction, if in the end we arrives southwest, this south direction was not of much use to us, on the other hand if Max Valentin wandered us a little on the fact that south was a general direction, in this case south is of importance and we integrate it into our hunt and it's a completely different way of approaching these enigmas and...)
MB : SOUTH is what you deduce from the book?