Moteur de recherche & Synthèse des "Midits" sur le jeu "Sur la trace de la Chouette d'Or ®"

<< Back

22/03/2024 - Vocal n° 66 - 2:07:45 45: Terminals Saint Martin - do not dig in the middle or at the foot of the BSM

(Q - Nabil: I have a problem, Michel. I'm at Bornes Saint-Martin, I have 3 sentries and if I take your words literally, go dig elsewhere, that would be a bad idea.)

MB: Do these words literally tell you to go dig elsewhere?

(Q - Nabil: Because I understand the sentinels well, they are the last markers to find and use. And me, when I arrive at Bornes Saint-Martin, when I see a stone, I see the other two, and I don't see any other stone on the ground, 100 meters around, there is nothing.
So, I deduce that the 3 sentinels are that. Because if I move away, I won't be able to see all 3. And since these are the last landmarks to find and use, I have to potentially dig around them. I couldn't go away to try to find another marker 300 meters away for example, or 500 meters, to find my pile-up there, using another marker. Because I see the sentries, if I see one, I see them all, if they are the last markers to use, they are the last markers to find. So with these three arguments, the three stones of Bornes Saint-Martin, I pull a rope from where I am or..., whatever, and there, I find my pile-on not too far away, maybe at 10 meters, 15 meters, I don't know. So if I take your words literally, I have to do this. And if I offer you something that takes me too far away or that makes me find another reference, well, that would be, I would say, that it would be wrong, if I see things like that?)


MB: Look, you're thinking out loud, that's good, I think everyone is happy to share your reactions. I don't forbid anyone from digging there or elsewhere, everyone digs where they want. My point is not to keep anyone away from anything.
My goal is to encourage players to think differently from what they have done until now. Nothing else.
If you are in Bornes Saint-Martin, if everything you just told me works in your mind, if you are convinced that there is something...

(Q - Nabil: To be honest, it doesn't work, to be honest, all I'm proposing is on another benchmark anyway.)

MB: I read what you sent Nabil.

(Q - Nabil: Yes, that's it, but to be honest, what I'm proposing is on another benchmark, because I don't believe in it. But what I wanted to say , that's what I'm doing, how can I put it, I'm putting aside one or two of your comments.
I tell myself that it's not possible, that we can't dig around Bornes Saint-Martin, it's not there.)


MB: I never said to dig around Bornes Saint-Martin, finally.

(Q - Nabil: No, but I know, but the problem is that if you see one sentry, you see them all…)

MB: I said not to dig in the middle of the Bornes Saint-Martin, at the foot of the Bornes Saint-Martin. Because, at one point, the photos that were published showed that the Bornes Saint-Martin were almost uprooted, if they have roots, I don't know how big they are...

(Q - Nabil: There is no problem with that, but I don't know how to explain, it's that... There you go, the thing I want to say is that I can't find another landmark than that. That's it, that's it, these three stones, it stops there.)

MB: You have made a reputation for yourself.

(Q - Nabil: Well yes, but the problem is that I have trouble envisioning it.)
(Q - Exalastro: Open your eyes Nabil, open your eyes.)
(Q - Nabil: No but, roughly speaking, if I move away, Michel, am I necessarily wrong? Am I going to move away towards a another reference point, did I…)

MB: If I answer you and you find it, we'll do it half and half!