(Q - ??: That's good, that's a good thing, right?)
MB: It's not a bad thing, but it's not what can lead to the solution.
(Q - ??: Oh good?)
MB: It’s too extreme.
(Q - Exalastro: Can I extrapolate to say that this famous trick, this discovery is not of the type of children's dreams, then?)
MB: Yes, it is of the ilk of children's dreams, but children's dreams are limitless. The problem is that children... A kid who goes off into his daydreams will constantly add to them.
And then this, and then that, and then there you have it, mountains have legs, and then they move, and then fish do too, fish have legs, and sticks have legs, and everyone has legs .
(Q - ??: Yes, but it's complicated to keep the balance, because we want, we know that there is still a childhood dream in the find, so we knows, that’s what…)
MB: Finally, the childhood dream, I wasn't too heavy-handed with the childhood dream, I mainly focused on a pirate's trick, on a functioning that can quite recall pirate stories. And when kids are asked about pirate stories, their imagination is much more limited because they have examples, because they rely on examples that they have read, that they have seen, that they they have heard, but when they go for things where they extrapolate in all directions, we no longer know how to stop them.
(Q - Sylvain: Yes, well, there is still another dimension to find.)
MB: Yes, yes, yes, of course, of course. I am not calling into question anything that I have been able to tell you over and over again and repeat and affirm. I'm just telling you that we talked about advice to people who have good sentinels, I say open your eyes and when I say open your eyes, I evoke this image of a kid who is daydreaming somewhere, well who is in his…, who is in his own world.
However, when we turn to hunting, when we are faced with the last solution, we are not in a world of kids without limits. We are in a world that, we will say, somewhat correlates with stories of pirates and which can also be, obviously, stories of youth, of children, which interest children. But we are not, strictly speaking, in childhood daydreams. So, at some point, you have to refrain from going too far. We must refrain from imagining correlations, concordances, extreme coincidences which could never have been imagined, nor even envisaged by the designer.
(Q - Cattia17: Michel, it's Cattia17 again. So what is the owl missing to find the countermark?? What are we missing?)< /i>
(Q - All: The eyes. The eyes.)
(Q - ??: Cattia17: The eyes of the heart then perhaps?)
MB: No, no, the heart has nothing to do with the eyes, no, you shouldn't mix everything up, no, no, no. We don't look at things with the eyes of love there. We need… we need a much more rigorous look. The eyes of love are the empire of tolerance. And there, we are not at all, at all, with the eyes of love.
MB: It's not a bad thing, but it's not what can lead to the solution.
(Q - ??: Oh good?)
MB: It’s too extreme.
(Q - Exalastro: Can I extrapolate to say that this famous trick, this discovery is not of the type of children's dreams, then?)
MB: Yes, it is of the ilk of children's dreams, but children's dreams are limitless. The problem is that children... A kid who goes off into his daydreams will constantly add to them.
And then this, and then that, and then there you have it, mountains have legs, and then they move, and then fish do too, fish have legs, and sticks have legs, and everyone has legs .
(Q - ??: Yes, but it's complicated to keep the balance, because we want, we know that there is still a childhood dream in the find, so we knows, that’s what…)
MB: Finally, the childhood dream, I wasn't too heavy-handed with the childhood dream, I mainly focused on a pirate's trick, on a functioning that can quite recall pirate stories. And when kids are asked about pirate stories, their imagination is much more limited because they have examples, because they rely on examples that they have read, that they have seen, that they they have heard, but when they go for things where they extrapolate in all directions, we no longer know how to stop them.
(Q - Sylvain: Yes, well, there is still another dimension to find.)
MB: Yes, yes, yes, of course, of course. I am not calling into question anything that I have been able to tell you over and over again and repeat and affirm. I'm just telling you that we talked about advice to people who have good sentinels, I say open your eyes and when I say open your eyes, I evoke this image of a kid who is daydreaming somewhere, well who is in his…, who is in his own world.
However, when we turn to hunting, when we are faced with the last solution, we are not in a world of kids without limits. We are in a world that, we will say, somewhat correlates with stories of pirates and which can also be, obviously, stories of youth, of children, which interest children. But we are not, strictly speaking, in childhood daydreams. So, at some point, you have to refrain from going too far. We must refrain from imagining correlations, concordances, extreme coincidences which could never have been imagined, nor even envisaged by the designer.
(Q - Cattia17: Michel, it's Cattia17 again. So what is the owl missing to find the countermark?? What are we missing?)< /i>
(Q - All: The eyes. The eyes.)
(Q - ??: Cattia17: The eyes of the heart then perhaps?)
MB: No, no, the heart has nothing to do with the eyes, no, you shouldn't mix everything up, no, no, no. We don't look at things with the eyes of love there. We need… we need a much more rigorous look. The eyes of love are the empire of tolerance. And there, we are not at all, at all, with the eyes of love.