(Q - PtitLu: Excuse me, I have a question to ask. You told us that there were no contemporary characters, that is to say after 1875 in
hunting, and you also eliminated contemporary constructions. I wanted to know if, on the other hand, if during the resolution of the puzzles, particularly in the first nine, we could come across objects from after 1875. For example, a model or.
something like that.)
MB: No. Is this an exhaustive example or are there other examples?
(Q - ???: It could be an object that was built after 1900 for example. So, we can think of a model, we can think of a piece of furniture or something like that.)< /i>
MB: A model, a movable object, not a real estate object.
(Q - Syn: An ex-voto for example!)
MB: An ex-voto that would represent what, for example? Before answering absolutely, I think, I think, I think. My answer is no, but I'm thinking if there isn't the small exception that would mean that someone will still tell me that I said something stupid.
(Q - Roc: A submarine, for example.)
MB: A submarine. A submarine which would have been wrecked then, because since time...
(Q - Roc: Or which would be exposed and perched somewhere.)
MB: It's true that the more vicious people are, the quicker they react, when we're in this little game of questions and answers. It’s blatant, it’s obvious. Well, come on, I'll help you, after all, I have to help you a little, because otherwise, you'll never find... There's no object. There is no object.
We don't care about objects.
(Q - Nasca: So I have a question a little more specific than that concerning precisely everything that is contemporary. So, what about a statue, let's imagine, which would have been made in contemporary times, say after the Second World War, but which would represent a character who predates it well?)
MB: Would such a statue have its place in hunting?
(Q - Nasca: Exactly. Is this acceptable, is it considered contemporary?)
MB: So, I have the choice to answer on acceptable contemporary or on statue. Ultimately, this is a question that includes many elements. You have to put yourself in my place. He answered that, therefore there is no statue, he answered that, therefore there are perhaps statues. It's complicated, what you're asking me. It's very complicated. A contemporary statue, after what date?
(Q - Nasca: Let's say 20th century, after the Second World War.)
MB: Already, what seems to be my hesitations will already cause controversy. We will never get out of this. But I would say no. A contemporary statue which would represent… No, it would not be of interest to me. We talked about the Second World War.
(Q - Nasca: After the Second World War, yes.)
MB: My answer is no.
MB: No. Is this an exhaustive example or are there other examples?
(Q - ???: It could be an object that was built after 1900 for example. So, we can think of a model, we can think of a piece of furniture or something like that.)< /i>
MB: A model, a movable object, not a real estate object.
(Q - Syn: An ex-voto for example!)
MB: An ex-voto that would represent what, for example? Before answering absolutely, I think, I think, I think. My answer is no, but I'm thinking if there isn't the small exception that would mean that someone will still tell me that I said something stupid.
(Q - Roc: A submarine, for example.)
MB: A submarine. A submarine which would have been wrecked then, because since time...
(Q - Roc: Or which would be exposed and perched somewhere.)
MB: It's true that the more vicious people are, the quicker they react, when we're in this little game of questions and answers. It’s blatant, it’s obvious. Well, come on, I'll help you, after all, I have to help you a little, because otherwise, you'll never find... There's no object. There is no object.
We don't care about objects.
(Q - Nasca: So I have a question a little more specific than that concerning precisely everything that is contemporary. So, what about a statue, let's imagine, which would have been made in contemporary times, say after the Second World War, but which would represent a character who predates it well?)
MB: Would such a statue have its place in hunting?
(Q - Nasca: Exactly. Is this acceptable, is it considered contemporary?)
MB: So, I have the choice to answer on acceptable contemporary or on statue. Ultimately, this is a question that includes many elements. You have to put yourself in my place. He answered that, therefore there is no statue, he answered that, therefore there are perhaps statues. It's complicated, what you're asking me. It's very complicated. A contemporary statue, after what date?
(Q - Nasca: Let's say 20th century, after the Second World War.)
MB: Already, what seems to be my hesitations will already cause controversy. We will never get out of this. But I would say no. A contemporary statue which would represent… No, it would not be of interest to me. We talked about the Second World War.
(Q - Nasca: After the Second World War, yes.)
MB: My answer is no.