(Q - SaïdParis: if we find, if we decipher…)
MB: the great solution is linked to a specific location. If we find the great solution, it's in a specific place. So I can't be wrong if someone sends me the right solution. I said Great solution again, I hate the term, it brings to mind the 12th puzzle, I hate that. But it doesn't matter if I am given this good solution, I know that you are in the right place, you have captured everything, there is no problem!
(Q - Saïd: You spoke of work in the field afterwards, so I think that the question, if I'm not mistaken, would imply the fact that we were asking you exposed as foundry, without having done this work in the field?)
MB: Raw foundry, we talked about that, it defines a precise point, even raw foundry, it is a precise point and from there, you have to go to the field to dig up the countermark. And there indeed, you have to apply your theory on the ground, which, for those who have had the experience of going to a place that they had somewhat imagined in their head, et cetera, they have been able to realize that when we are in the field, it is often a little different from what we had imagined, even on images from Google Earth or things like that, for those who talk about their research or to validate by trying to find on maps, etc.
Finally, maps, satellite views rather, between what we see on an image, what we deduce on a map, and then what we find on the ground, there are often differences, but the super solution, it defines a precise point. So afterward yes indeed, we can define it without visualizing it very very well in our head, because we have never been there, that I understand. But the solution provided will still be very precise.
(Q - Syn: With the elements we have on site?)
MB: Yeah.
(Q - Aladore: So no need for a 2nd map to find the sentries, what?)
MB: No… laughs [Note Bioposis: we don’t know if he really answered no to Aladore…]
MB: the great solution is linked to a specific location. If we find the great solution, it's in a specific place. So I can't be wrong if someone sends me the right solution. I said Great solution again, I hate the term, it brings to mind the 12th puzzle, I hate that. But it doesn't matter if I am given this good solution, I know that you are in the right place, you have captured everything, there is no problem!
(Q - Saïd: You spoke of work in the field afterwards, so I think that the question, if I'm not mistaken, would imply the fact that we were asking you exposed as foundry, without having done this work in the field?)
MB: Raw foundry, we talked about that, it defines a precise point, even raw foundry, it is a precise point and from there, you have to go to the field to dig up the countermark. And there indeed, you have to apply your theory on the ground, which, for those who have had the experience of going to a place that they had somewhat imagined in their head, et cetera, they have been able to realize that when we are in the field, it is often a little different from what we had imagined, even on images from Google Earth or things like that, for those who talk about their research or to validate by trying to find on maps, etc.
Finally, maps, satellite views rather, between what we see on an image, what we deduce on a map, and then what we find on the ground, there are often differences, but the super solution, it defines a precise point. So afterward yes indeed, we can define it without visualizing it very very well in our head, because we have never been there, that I understand. But the solution provided will still be very precise.
(Q - Syn: With the elements we have on site?)
MB: Yeah.
(Q - Aladore: So no need for a 2nd map to find the sentries, what?)
MB: No… laughs [Note Bioposis: we don’t know if he really answered no to Aladore…]