(Q - Brybry: I would like to ask a question. It's more flexible, but it's also twisted. Be careful, really sorry. But how, what kind of advice can you get for
those who have difficulty believing in the discovery, as may be my case or I don't know, where we have difficulty, by having seen so many possibilities, we have difficulty putting in, jumping into what
, in the swimming pool what. I know the question is complicated eh. What kind of advice can you give us?)
MB: I'm not sure it's that complicated. The advice I would give is to really approach this like a cold case. When I speak of the 4 seasons, my dear Vivaldi, when I speak of the 4 seasons of the golden owl, it is not for nothing, it is to try to bring home the fact that between the game of departure and today's game, so much has happened, so much time has passed, that there is a whole baggage that has been added to the initial hunt and to the ideas departure. All that came together. Thirty years of theory, of affirmation, of platforms from one side and the other, of blocks of this, of that, I affirm, I know, it's called like this, that, it's not like that.< br /> And today, we have a lot of difficulty evolving in a, how shall I say, relatively objective way in all of this. That's why when I talk about cold cases, you have to do a little and I'm talking about Max's character, it's not for nothing, you have to do your investigation a little, you have to sort it out. So, there were the maddits, I prefer to eliminate them all because it's much too annoying. Afterwards everyone does what they want, but I give that as an opinion. And then, on each point on which we wish to rely, we must validate it, we must say well, my answer to the first riddle is this. I found it on the Internet or I found it on my own, whatever.
But you have to make sure that it’s the one you want to keep. You have to make your own certainty. This is how an investigator works, that is to say he takes evidence, he takes evidence, he reanalyses, he has an analysis redone, he studies, he validates point by point , to resume the investigation and at some point, he will perhaps say ah well on this point, indeed, there is something that does not add up and that is how we must approach hunting Today. We can no longer consider it as a traditional organized hunt, there is all this baggage that has been grafted onto it and we are obliged to take it into account.
(Q - Brybry: No, but I will try, so thank you very much, we have to review this in the form of investigation and analysis, and point by point. Keep a cool head point by point without getting let it influence what.)
MB: There you go, in fact, it's riddle by riddle, there are 11 points, you have to take them one by one and say to yourself, really make up your mind, you shouldn't say, well for me it's Bourges , for me it's Agen, I'm trying with Bourges, I'm trying... Why is it Agen, why is it Bourges, why is it something else. And you have to say OK, I saw this solution, it seems good to me and you have to digest it, you have to worry about it, create certainty about it.
MB: I'm not sure it's that complicated. The advice I would give is to really approach this like a cold case. When I speak of the 4 seasons, my dear Vivaldi, when I speak of the 4 seasons of the golden owl, it is not for nothing, it is to try to bring home the fact that between the game of departure and today's game, so much has happened, so much time has passed, that there is a whole baggage that has been added to the initial hunt and to the ideas departure. All that came together. Thirty years of theory, of affirmation, of platforms from one side and the other, of blocks of this, of that, I affirm, I know, it's called like this, that, it's not like that.< br /> And today, we have a lot of difficulty evolving in a, how shall I say, relatively objective way in all of this. That's why when I talk about cold cases, you have to do a little and I'm talking about Max's character, it's not for nothing, you have to do your investigation a little, you have to sort it out. So, there were the maddits, I prefer to eliminate them all because it's much too annoying. Afterwards everyone does what they want, but I give that as an opinion. And then, on each point on which we wish to rely, we must validate it, we must say well, my answer to the first riddle is this. I found it on the Internet or I found it on my own, whatever.
But you have to make sure that it’s the one you want to keep. You have to make your own certainty. This is how an investigator works, that is to say he takes evidence, he takes evidence, he reanalyses, he has an analysis redone, he studies, he validates point by point , to resume the investigation and at some point, he will perhaps say ah well on this point, indeed, there is something that does not add up and that is how we must approach hunting Today. We can no longer consider it as a traditional organized hunt, there is all this baggage that has been grafted onto it and we are obliged to take it into account.
(Q - Brybry: No, but I will try, so thank you very much, we have to review this in the form of investigation and analysis, and point by point. Keep a cool head point by point without getting let it influence what.)
MB: There you go, in fact, it's riddle by riddle, there are 11 points, you have to take them one by one and say to yourself, really make up your mind, you shouldn't say, well for me it's Bourges , for me it's Agen, I'm trying with Bourges, I'm trying... Why is it Agen, why is it Bourges, why is it something else. And you have to say OK, I saw this solution, it seems good to me and you have to digest it, you have to worry about it, create certainty about it.