Moteur de recherche & Synthèse des "Midits" sur le jeu "Sur la trace de la Chouette d'Or ®"

<< Back

09/01/2024 - Vocal n° 64 - 05:30 : SS - Finding the countermark by chance does not allow you to deduct the SS

(Q - SaïdParis: Michel, a strange question, if for example, you receive in this validation system the precise pile-up obtained by deduction, it's a hypothesis, eh, how would you react would you react? That is to say, you would say to this invalid person because obviously the super solution does not appear, nor the trick. But what if there was ever a way to intellectually bypass this trick.)

MB: There isn’t.

(Q - SaïdParis: So we can't even consider the hypothesis?)

MB: No, it's not possible to short-circuit, that's why I say, if someone one day unfortunately unearthed the countermark using a detector or something, of a construction machine, whatever you want, whatever, it would be impossible to reverse engineer, to reconstruct the solution, it would not be possible. There is only one possible solution.

(Q - SaïdParis: If you had to consider it, what would you say? You would say I invalidate it?)

MB: But this question is funny. At the same time I understand the insistence but it is not possible. That's what I said when I figured it out, that's what I said the very first time, hats off Max. God knows there are plenty of points on which I don't take my hat off to him, but on this one the find is very beautiful. The way in which it was used, it made me say, and I maintain it, that's why I made a lot of effort in this direction, made me say that in the initial version, without everything what I could have brought, I believe it would have been, well I don't think so, I am sure that at a given moment, he would have been obliged to give the additional clue or the information which would have allowed for someone to come up with the solution.