(Q - Bioposis: No problem, I wanted to come back to the notion of review, which we discussed a lot. I was in the army, as you often asked us
, “did you do the army and everything?” I did the army, I was reviewed and when I was reviewed, my chief adjutant at the time
explained to me, it was a notion of trust in fact, the trust of the authority in its troops and of the troops in the authority. I am making a shortcut and so that is the military point of view and I.
had another meaning of review which was a sort of census...Could you, in relation to these 2 notions, guide us?)
MB: Well, the notion of a census, I don't really understand for the sake of review... of counting people? to say to count them, count them down or…??
(Q - Bioposis: to have reviewed everything, to have listed everything, what we did.)
MB: But why…, why would that be important?
(Q - Bioposis: what we did on the first 9 for example, I list...)
MB: It's funny what you say, in fact, the way, my dear Bioposis, the way in which you question me means that if I answer, you would be, probably and probably not the only one, tempted to want to confirm the fact that the expression that interests us most would be “to review”? Is that what you think?
(Q - Bioposis: you are too strong, Michel.)
(Q - Exalastro: Well, it's written in the book at the same time.)
MB: Exactly, that’s one of the expressions that appears in the book. But don't count on me to say more.
(Q - Bioposis: But no, but no. But it was a try. I tried. Good evening.)
MB: Nice try, nice try.
(Q - Palestrina: Michel, you talked about it earlier and I think you were cut off earlier, but you were explaining a little how it happens I was interested because I never did my service… )
.
MB: But you are twisted. I never explained how it happened. I asked, how did you do it? You're completely reversing things.
(Q - Palestrina: I've never done it, you see, I'm a little bothered actually, because I looked at the definition in the dictionary like everyone else, but I I have the impression that there is something more, how can I say something more grounded, something bordering if we didn't do it at the time, we will perhaps have more difficulty understanding what .)
MB: When you were a kid, did you ever play soldiers or anything like that? No ?
(Q - Palestrina: Yes I played soldiers, but I didn't really review them too much. I put them in a row because...)< br />
MB: It’s funny, you keep bringing me back to that expression. Good. This is a very interesting expression which, in my opinion, can be understood quite simply. But I don't know why you seem to consider that there are 150,000 ways to pass into view, etc., It seems complicated.
(Q - Exalastro: Well, you said that we shouldn't be surprised by the review. But we know that the change of gear will happen at the level of the sentinels, so it is logical and normal that we arrive at a stage where we review sentries knowing that behind us we have a Max Valentin who was very literary and played with words. So, we feel that there is something happening there. at that moment and yet we should not be surprised But yet we perceive that we are missing something very important at this level.)
. (Q - Palestrina: So we say to ourselves that this expression is still in the right place, that if there were to be a trick, well, it wouldn't be bad if it happened here and so well we're looking for something, yeah, from there, not necessarily something crazy, eh.)
(Q - Jennifer: Can our sentries move us?)
MB: But I am fascinated when I hear you, because ultimately, you are listing to me, one after the other or one after the other, your theories, the way in which you reason about the subject and then afterwards, when at times, I mention the fact that the community is progressing, that things are going in the right direction, you tend to answer me or simply answer that ultimately yeah, well why am I saying that, you don't understand why I say that? But in fact, you are all reasoning about things in a way that was not possible even 2 years ago.
(Q - Exalastro: We perceive this encouragement to say to ourselves that things are progressing and there is..., it was January 8, it was supposed to unlock everything and in the end, we are 10 months later and we is still at the same stage We do not perceive the progress.)
MB: No no, but it's like a suppository, you have to wait for it to melt to take effect.
(Q - Exalastro: But it's good there, I think that at 37° it's melted there.)
MB: No, no, but we shouldn't listen to you like that, patience, patience, you'll get there eh.
(Q - Skybears: And there, you have just validated that the review could be a census?)
MB: That the review could be what, a census? But no, I didn't validate anything at all. You are unbearable. You absolutely want to create... You are unbearable because in fact, you always try to draw a hasty conclusion, to say ah, you have validated, you have that..., I exchange with you in a completely spontaneous way , free, peaceful. I measure my words because I know very well that if I say something stupid, I will ruin the game. So I have to be careful. However, I have a fairly spontaneous exchange with you, so I respond to you in a fairly free manner. Don't jump to conclusions all over the place!
(Q - Skybears: In fact, you stated that the review and finally the census could be an meaning of the review.)
MB: I didn't say anything at all, I tell you, you tell me that, it's part of the reasoning you have, I leave it to you to choose, as you say, the correct meaning. But for me, the term acceptance has nothing to do with all that. The review, I think we all understand what it is, there is no problem of acceptance. The problem is elsewhere and so if there is a problem, that's it and then don't ask me to confirm or deny, I'll just tell you, well, listen, you're reasoning in a way which is much healthier than what was practiced for 28 years before I arrived.
MB: Well, the notion of a census, I don't really understand for the sake of review... of counting people? to say to count them, count them down or…??
(Q - Bioposis: to have reviewed everything, to have listed everything, what we did.)
MB: But why…, why would that be important?
(Q - Bioposis: what we did on the first 9 for example, I list...)
MB: It's funny what you say, in fact, the way, my dear Bioposis, the way in which you question me means that if I answer, you would be, probably and probably not the only one, tempted to want to confirm the fact that the expression that interests us most would be “to review”? Is that what you think?
(Q - Bioposis: you are too strong, Michel.)
(Q - Exalastro: Well, it's written in the book at the same time.)
MB: Exactly, that’s one of the expressions that appears in the book. But don't count on me to say more.
(Q - Bioposis: But no, but no. But it was a try. I tried. Good evening.)
MB: Nice try, nice try.
(Q - Palestrina: Michel, you talked about it earlier and I think you were cut off earlier, but you were explaining a little how it happens I was interested because I never did my service… )
.
MB: But you are twisted. I never explained how it happened. I asked, how did you do it? You're completely reversing things.
(Q - Palestrina: I've never done it, you see, I'm a little bothered actually, because I looked at the definition in the dictionary like everyone else, but I I have the impression that there is something more, how can I say something more grounded, something bordering if we didn't do it at the time, we will perhaps have more difficulty understanding what .)
MB: When you were a kid, did you ever play soldiers or anything like that? No ?
(Q - Palestrina: Yes I played soldiers, but I didn't really review them too much. I put them in a row because...)< br />
MB: It’s funny, you keep bringing me back to that expression. Good. This is a very interesting expression which, in my opinion, can be understood quite simply. But I don't know why you seem to consider that there are 150,000 ways to pass into view, etc., It seems complicated.
(Q - Exalastro: Well, you said that we shouldn't be surprised by the review. But we know that the change of gear will happen at the level of the sentinels, so it is logical and normal that we arrive at a stage where we review sentries knowing that behind us we have a Max Valentin who was very literary and played with words. So, we feel that there is something happening there. at that moment and yet we should not be surprised But yet we perceive that we are missing something very important at this level.)
. (Q - Palestrina: So we say to ourselves that this expression is still in the right place, that if there were to be a trick, well, it wouldn't be bad if it happened here and so well we're looking for something, yeah, from there, not necessarily something crazy, eh.)
(Q - Jennifer: Can our sentries move us?)
MB: But I am fascinated when I hear you, because ultimately, you are listing to me, one after the other or one after the other, your theories, the way in which you reason about the subject and then afterwards, when at times, I mention the fact that the community is progressing, that things are going in the right direction, you tend to answer me or simply answer that ultimately yeah, well why am I saying that, you don't understand why I say that? But in fact, you are all reasoning about things in a way that was not possible even 2 years ago.
(Q - Exalastro: We perceive this encouragement to say to ourselves that things are progressing and there is..., it was January 8, it was supposed to unlock everything and in the end, we are 10 months later and we is still at the same stage We do not perceive the progress.)
MB: No no, but it's like a suppository, you have to wait for it to melt to take effect.
(Q - Exalastro: But it's good there, I think that at 37° it's melted there.)
MB: No, no, but we shouldn't listen to you like that, patience, patience, you'll get there eh.
(Q - Skybears: And there, you have just validated that the review could be a census?)
MB: That the review could be what, a census? But no, I didn't validate anything at all. You are unbearable. You absolutely want to create... You are unbearable because in fact, you always try to draw a hasty conclusion, to say ah, you have validated, you have that..., I exchange with you in a completely spontaneous way , free, peaceful. I measure my words because I know very well that if I say something stupid, I will ruin the game. So I have to be careful. However, I have a fairly spontaneous exchange with you, so I respond to you in a fairly free manner. Don't jump to conclusions all over the place!
(Q - Skybears: In fact, you stated that the review and finally the census could be an meaning of the review.)
MB: I didn't say anything at all, I tell you, you tell me that, it's part of the reasoning you have, I leave it to you to choose, as you say, the correct meaning. But for me, the term acceptance has nothing to do with all that. The review, I think we all understand what it is, there is no problem of acceptance. The problem is elsewhere and so if there is a problem, that's it and then don't ask me to confirm or deny, I'll just tell you, well, listen, you're reasoning in a way which is much healthier than what was practiced for 28 years before I arrived.