(Q - Mupsaï: So now, it was in relation to what had just been said previously, so it risks being taken out of context because…
MB: No, no, no, no, no. I remember what I still say.
(Q - Mupsai - Finally for a moment, interesting on the nature of the material in which the owl was. Yes, in relation to everything you said, we should already be certain that we are to the good there, that we had, that we are in the right place And because you present all that a little bit, as if the hunters, well, they're not even hunters It's as if in fact. The entire hunt was more or less solved by the first 9 for most people, and in fact, they only have to concentrate on the last 2 puzzles and therefore roughly on the discovery of the pile-pile and the place where we have to carry our shovel But it always seems strange to me this amalgamation in fact on the fact that we present it to you finally, I always have the impression that you dissociate. the hunt in 2 main parts I'm not saying it's good, bad or anything else, but roughly speaking, there are nine first puzzles which are solved, we can find them on the net, et cetera. Now, there are lots of different answers on the net and then the last 2 which are in fact the gear change and besides, I'm sorry because I would be interested in asking a question about the gear change. )
MB: Afterwards, we take it later, we start the first, then we will ask the question.
(Q - Mupsai: So this first question is that you simply present the fact that now we have to persuade ourselves, but you always said that we had to be careful with everything we could , without the persuasions of the players But here we would have to convince ourselves of something, try to go through with it and then, if that doesn't work, maybe try another way, but force it a little. just on the last 2 puzzles, but that would still imply that we had everything good before and that we were at least at the right point of 650. Do we agree on that or not?)< /u>
MB: Yes, but what is the question Mupsai, what is the question?
(Q - Mupsai: Well the question is, I have the feeling that you are really convinced that the majority of players are in the right place, is that the case for you? )
MB: So what was my problem when I started playing again 2 years ago, it was to say to myself, I discovered how, why and where, in a way the owls had stopped for many years.
What I notice is that the first 9 puzzles have been solved by a certain number of owls. Not always, as I said, not everyone always has all the right solutions in their hands. But the first 9 puzzles have had their solutions, some have found them and there is no doubt about it. Even if for some of them, there were things that were not clearly captured or elucidated, that did not block the process. So on the first 9 puzzles, my conclusion as an organizer is to say it's findable. As long as it's findable, when others have found them, find them. I don’t have…
(Q - Mupsai: There you go, that's 2 players who at least at the moment.)
MB: But there are many players who have good solutions on the first 9. Some probably have the new ones in hand, I don't know them all, there are thousands of players.
(Q - Mupsai: At 2, 3 ready acceptance variants held, there you go, it looks good, that's it for…)
MB: There you go. Then there are important groups on Facebook and elsewhere that are not necessarily here. I am not necessarily in contact with all the players, but from what I can know today, I say, the first 9 puzzles have had their solution, some have found them, a certain number have found them, from from there, they are findable, from there I have nothing to do, it's up to everyone to find them.
I mean, I'm not here to take the hand of some people and make them move faster than others, or et cetera, that wouldn't be logical. So from there, I am reassured as an organizer by telling myself there is no blockage.
On the other hand, I noticed that there was a blockage beyond these first 9 enigmas, and from there I intervene and I intervene not by saying don't worry about the first 9 anymore because well, it You still have to pay close attention to it, but beyond that there is a way out.
And at the end, today I try to balance my interventions between people who have been looking for a long time and newcomers, and the whole range of intermediaries. So, I tell myself every intervention that I can give, every clue that I can give, every information that I can give must not favor this or that category of players, otherwise I distort the game. It's nothing else . My interventions are only dictated by that.
MB: No, no, no, no, no. I remember what I still say.
(Q - Mupsai - Finally for a moment, interesting on the nature of the material in which the owl was. Yes, in relation to everything you said, we should already be certain that we are to the good there, that we had, that we are in the right place And because you present all that a little bit, as if the hunters, well, they're not even hunters It's as if in fact. The entire hunt was more or less solved by the first 9 for most people, and in fact, they only have to concentrate on the last 2 puzzles and therefore roughly on the discovery of the pile-pile and the place where we have to carry our shovel But it always seems strange to me this amalgamation in fact on the fact that we present it to you finally, I always have the impression that you dissociate. the hunt in 2 main parts I'm not saying it's good, bad or anything else, but roughly speaking, there are nine first puzzles which are solved, we can find them on the net, et cetera. Now, there are lots of different answers on the net and then the last 2 which are in fact the gear change and besides, I'm sorry because I would be interested in asking a question about the gear change. )
MB: Afterwards, we take it later, we start the first, then we will ask the question.
(Q - Mupsai: So this first question is that you simply present the fact that now we have to persuade ourselves, but you always said that we had to be careful with everything we could , without the persuasions of the players But here we would have to convince ourselves of something, try to go through with it and then, if that doesn't work, maybe try another way, but force it a little. just on the last 2 puzzles, but that would still imply that we had everything good before and that we were at least at the right point of 650. Do we agree on that or not?)< /u>
MB: Yes, but what is the question Mupsai, what is the question?
(Q - Mupsai: Well the question is, I have the feeling that you are really convinced that the majority of players are in the right place, is that the case for you? )
MB: So what was my problem when I started playing again 2 years ago, it was to say to myself, I discovered how, why and where, in a way the owls had stopped for many years.
What I notice is that the first 9 puzzles have been solved by a certain number of owls. Not always, as I said, not everyone always has all the right solutions in their hands. But the first 9 puzzles have had their solutions, some have found them and there is no doubt about it. Even if for some of them, there were things that were not clearly captured or elucidated, that did not block the process. So on the first 9 puzzles, my conclusion as an organizer is to say it's findable. As long as it's findable, when others have found them, find them. I don’t have…
(Q - Mupsai: There you go, that's 2 players who at least at the moment.)
MB: But there are many players who have good solutions on the first 9. Some probably have the new ones in hand, I don't know them all, there are thousands of players.
(Q - Mupsai: At 2, 3 ready acceptance variants held, there you go, it looks good, that's it for…)
MB: There you go. Then there are important groups on Facebook and elsewhere that are not necessarily here. I am not necessarily in contact with all the players, but from what I can know today, I say, the first 9 puzzles have had their solution, some have found them, a certain number have found them, from from there, they are findable, from there I have nothing to do, it's up to everyone to find them.
I mean, I'm not here to take the hand of some people and make them move faster than others, or et cetera, that wouldn't be logical. So from there, I am reassured as an organizer by telling myself there is no blockage.
On the other hand, I noticed that there was a blockage beyond these first 9 enigmas, and from there I intervene and I intervene not by saying don't worry about the first 9 anymore because well, it You still have to pay close attention to it, but beyond that there is a way out.
And at the end, today I try to balance my interventions between people who have been looking for a long time and newcomers, and the whole range of intermediaries. So, I tell myself every intervention that I can give, every clue that I can give, every information that I can give must not favor this or that category of players, otherwise I distort the game. It's nothing else . My interventions are only dictated by that.