Moteur de recherche & Synthèse des "Midits" sur le jeu "Sur la trace de la Chouette d'Or ®"

<< Back

31/10/2023 - Vocal n° 62 - 00:00 : Distinction between remainders / reflexes

(Q - Skybears: It's terrible...)

MB - But no, it's not terrible at all. I read things where some people are discouraged. “We're fed up, we can't find anything, we're being taken around, et cetera...” But you've probably been taken away, but I'm not taking you around, it takes a little time...

(Q - Saïdparis: We are aware of this Michel. Good evening Michel, it's Saïd. Good evening Michel, thank you already.)

MB: We're talking to each other Saïd, we're finally talking to each other.

(Q - Saïdparis: We have, we have exchanged once or twice very quickly but…)

MB: I know. But since then you have written so much.

(Q - Saïdparis: It's true, I said a lot of stupid things, but I also said a lot of things to try to reframe the game a little according to what you said. Finally try …)
(Q - Saïdparis: I wanted to tell you in fact, in relation to my message earlier in fact, where it is true that there was a big clash which took place is done in a rather brutal way, it is that, at least for my part, I felt it a little bit too, but for my part How… My most present question in my mind is. was: how someone who created a game from A to Z, tells us that we have to go back, collect things, put them together to find the final solution How it can be... That's it, how it can not. be that at all and even the opposite, don't look for anything, just reflexes and I can understand. So at first, you must have noticed, I tried to associate the notion of reflex with what. what Max meant at the time in terms of the remainder. Maybe he, I said to myself, maybe his reflexes for him were things that we had understood in the game and not found, because. He said that there was nothing in the riddles, nothing in the texts, nothing in this, not even in your solutions. It is in the course of your decryptions. So, I said to myself that perhaps he too considered that these were notions or things learned that would be useful to us later and that you would simply use a different term. But on several occasions you said that no, it wasn't that at all. How could he have been so wrong, and that's what really frustrated me the most.)

MB: How long have you been interested in Saïd hunting?

(Q - Saïd: Let's say that about fifteen years ago, I had searched for about 5 years with all the sleepless nights that there were at the time, eh, you remember, with all the fuss and things, finally, it became a Wikipedia hunt, eh, which today, thanks to you, is no longer so. And I want to thank you for that. because a lot of people say to themselves, now we're going to avoid going too far, et cetera, and to stay focused on what the enigmas tell us and that's a good thing. But then, I have. stopped about ten years ago and I started again since your return in fact.)

MB: I understand, you know, I said, repeated, wrote moreover in the books that I published and I said and repeated that indeed, we had to be interested in the character of Max Valentin. You are just now mentioning the incongruity represented by my assertions saying that the curses are false and that it is not at all like that, etc., you are just now opposing leftovers and reflexes. I ask you not to do this because the remainders are something very different. Reflexes don't need to be thought about, they happen on their own. It's the doctor who taps your kneecap and your leg goes up. It's a reflex so that means, there's no need to think about it, it will happen on its own.