(Q - Bioposis: Hello Michel, it's Bioposis, can you hear me?)
MB: Hello Bioposis, 5 out of 5.
(Q - Bioposis: Ah well that's perfect, thank you, I would have two things to ask you. A question then it's not a small question because it's an important question for me. And then a question about the 30 years So, if I may mention a notion that you yourself introduced in your answers, it is on the notion of usefulness of the information found in the puzzles. There you go, I'm a little sorry, it's a little long, but you'll understand.)
MB: Come on, let’s go.
(Q - Bioposis: Come on, let's go. You said that we shouldn't be able to say my solution to the enigma, that's it. Part of what I found, I use it to continue and then part of it, I don't know what it is for. It would be left over and that doesn't exist. You specified it, there is no problem. no riddle leads to finding something which would not be useful at the moment and which would be useful later. But at that time, you had mentioned the term remainder, therefore a connection with use, a connection with. the great solution and finally you finished this comment by indicating, we must not under any circumstances store information which would not be useful immediately and which will be useful to us later, this time without mentioning the remainders. So my question is. the next one, Michel, have I understood correctly that this notion of immediate usefulness, in quotes, is valid throughout the puzzles of our journey of the first 9, and not only with regard to the super. solution ? It would go back to the notion you mentioned of leaving nothing undone. Thank you Michel.)
MB: So thank you for the question, it is very clear. I actually confirm that for each riddle we must find an answer. When we find the answer, we can be happy. We say to ourselves Ah, I solved the riddle. I found what I needed to find. So we have achieved the objective, we move on and so on. This is what I call the route that must be taken to arrive at a place where the cache is located, the pile pile, it's the same thing, the cache, the exact place where the countermark is. So this path is done by a principle of enigma to which we answer, when we have answered, we continue on our path. When we reach the end, we change gear. We think differently, we reflect. There's a trick, there's all that. Good thing. In short, we find what we think we will find, what we must find. If the two coincide and well we have everything good and at that moment, there are things or a few little things where we will say to ourselves Ah yes, OK, okay, indeed I know that, so I 'in use. That's really it. But where I reacted quite strongly and that was my debut as the new organizer of the game.
It was when I understood, when I was able to measure the level of toxicity of this notion of remainder. My problem for me is not to say, there are remainders or there are none, it is to measure to what extent this simple term of remainder could have failed the players. I read at the time when the AOC did not yet exist, the Discord was starting and I would therefore go from time to time to see on the A2CO what was being said, and I saw messages where the guys they said, I don't remember the number anymore, eh, but it was I have 23 leftovers, I have 24 leftovers, I have 56, I don't know how much the guys collected the leftovers, saying to themselves we were in the, we were in one of those video games, where you collect things and then when the time comes you use them. That was exactly what I felt from what I read, which has nothing to do with hunting the Golden Owl. We don't have that at all in the game, so this notion of remainder does not exist and it is true that when you arrive at the moment of the super solution, there are things that you will have picked up along the way and which will come in handy again, but once again, you won't even need to make an effort, it will come by itself. Ah yes OK, okay, that's it, it's overlaps. There you go, you're going to make one or two cross-references which will tell you Ah yes, OK, okay, that's it, and that's it. That's exactly what's going to happen, but certainly not things that you'll have in your pocket, that you'll take out saying Well I found a coin, a nail, a life, a key, I don't know what. There I use the key, there I use the nail, there I use the screw, No, not at all.
(Q - Bioposis: Great. My question for example, so I'm going to ask an example but it's still important. The enigma 780, some come out with 33 cm and the notion of SUD but there is no use in fact so what I hear with your answer is that we really have a use for the solutions. We have a use, it serves us something. That's important.)
MB: Well of course. But the 780 has a use, well obviously.
MB: Hello Bioposis, 5 out of 5.
(Q - Bioposis: Ah well that's perfect, thank you, I would have two things to ask you. A question then it's not a small question because it's an important question for me. And then a question about the 30 years So, if I may mention a notion that you yourself introduced in your answers, it is on the notion of usefulness of the information found in the puzzles. There you go, I'm a little sorry, it's a little long, but you'll understand.)
MB: Come on, let’s go.
(Q - Bioposis: Come on, let's go. You said that we shouldn't be able to say my solution to the enigma, that's it. Part of what I found, I use it to continue and then part of it, I don't know what it is for. It would be left over and that doesn't exist. You specified it, there is no problem. no riddle leads to finding something which would not be useful at the moment and which would be useful later. But at that time, you had mentioned the term remainder, therefore a connection with use, a connection with. the great solution and finally you finished this comment by indicating, we must not under any circumstances store information which would not be useful immediately and which will be useful to us later, this time without mentioning the remainders. So my question is. the next one, Michel, have I understood correctly that this notion of immediate usefulness, in quotes, is valid throughout the puzzles of our journey of the first 9, and not only with regard to the super. solution ? It would go back to the notion you mentioned of leaving nothing undone. Thank you Michel.)
MB: So thank you for the question, it is very clear. I actually confirm that for each riddle we must find an answer. When we find the answer, we can be happy. We say to ourselves Ah, I solved the riddle. I found what I needed to find. So we have achieved the objective, we move on and so on. This is what I call the route that must be taken to arrive at a place where the cache is located, the pile pile, it's the same thing, the cache, the exact place where the countermark is. So this path is done by a principle of enigma to which we answer, when we have answered, we continue on our path. When we reach the end, we change gear. We think differently, we reflect. There's a trick, there's all that. Good thing. In short, we find what we think we will find, what we must find. If the two coincide and well we have everything good and at that moment, there are things or a few little things where we will say to ourselves Ah yes, OK, okay, indeed I know that, so I 'in use. That's really it. But where I reacted quite strongly and that was my debut as the new organizer of the game.
It was when I understood, when I was able to measure the level of toxicity of this notion of remainder. My problem for me is not to say, there are remainders or there are none, it is to measure to what extent this simple term of remainder could have failed the players. I read at the time when the AOC did not yet exist, the Discord was starting and I would therefore go from time to time to see on the A2CO what was being said, and I saw messages where the guys they said, I don't remember the number anymore, eh, but it was I have 23 leftovers, I have 24 leftovers, I have 56, I don't know how much the guys collected the leftovers, saying to themselves we were in the, we were in one of those video games, where you collect things and then when the time comes you use them. That was exactly what I felt from what I read, which has nothing to do with hunting the Golden Owl. We don't have that at all in the game, so this notion of remainder does not exist and it is true that when you arrive at the moment of the super solution, there are things that you will have picked up along the way and which will come in handy again, but once again, you won't even need to make an effort, it will come by itself. Ah yes OK, okay, that's it, it's overlaps. There you go, you're going to make one or two cross-references which will tell you Ah yes, OK, okay, that's it, and that's it. That's exactly what's going to happen, but certainly not things that you'll have in your pocket, that you'll take out saying Well I found a coin, a nail, a life, a key, I don't know what. There I use the key, there I use the nail, there I use the screw, No, not at all.
(Q - Bioposis: Great. My question for example, so I'm going to ask an example but it's still important. The enigma 780, some come out with 33 cm and the notion of SUD but there is no use in fact so what I hear with your answer is that we really have a use for the solutions. We have a use, it serves us something. That's important.)
MB: Well of course. But the 780 has a use, well obviously.