(Q - Xavier d'Homan: I have a question to ask you, but it's a straight-up question so if you can't answer this type of question, say so, I insist
not.)
MB: And I will absolutely say it in a very spontaneous way.
(Q - Xavier d'Homan: Okay, it's quite simple, you explained clearly to us that we were leaving, we could leave with the great solution, the stack in our pocket, we arrived there, we did our little thing, we found the owl We agree that when we leave, we have the elements for example, that's, let's imagine that there is a distance to take. . We agree that we leave with this distance in our pocket)
MB: What I mainly want to say is yes, yes, why not, but what I mainly want to say is that at that moment, we must no longer allow ourselves to do things like: Um, if it's written like that, it could mean that and then we reinterpret. And then I see some who send me their solutions, their great solutions, that we are talking about the same one, explaining to me that if they remove the E, it does this. If they remove the A's, it does that, if they remove the S's, it does something different, we are no longer in this logic at all, what, at the level of the super solution. We are in something much more both basic and clever. There you go, there's a trick, but it's completely basic. Finally, there is no need to look for interpretation, any symbolism or anything. That's what I mean.
MB: And I will absolutely say it in a very spontaneous way.
(Q - Xavier d'Homan: Okay, it's quite simple, you explained clearly to us that we were leaving, we could leave with the great solution, the stack in our pocket, we arrived there, we did our little thing, we found the owl We agree that when we leave, we have the elements for example, that's, let's imagine that there is a distance to take. . We agree that we leave with this distance in our pocket)
MB: What I mainly want to say is yes, yes, why not, but what I mainly want to say is that at that moment, we must no longer allow ourselves to do things like: Um, if it's written like that, it could mean that and then we reinterpret. And then I see some who send me their solutions, their great solutions, that we are talking about the same one, explaining to me that if they remove the E, it does this. If they remove the A's, it does that, if they remove the S's, it does something different, we are no longer in this logic at all, what, at the level of the super solution. We are in something much more both basic and clever. There you go, there's a trick, but it's completely basic. Finally, there is no need to look for interpretation, any symbolism or anything. That's what I mean.