(Q - Roc: the fable says “as in another world of which it would be the center”, we must find this other world or is it not important?)
[inaudible]
MB: you have to go deeper, you have to listen to everything in this text, every word is interesting.
(Q - ??: I've heard a lot of nerds talking about the pot-aux-roses, do you have anything to say on that subject? On that association of words , the pejorative side, what is there in France outside of these origins?)
MB: Yeah when you say this association of words, there is no religious connotation. [No] Okay, that reassures me. I find the pot-aux-roses pretty, when you discover the pot-aux-roses, you understand everything
So on the meaning of words I believe that we must be wary of very contemporary meanings, because the vocabulary evolves so much, the practices in terms of text interpretation evolve so much that I think we must be careful not to focus on a meaning rather than another and that more usefully, you have to stick to the primary meaning of the expressions, that's almost always how I work. I don't use many fashionable expressions or terms that are totally misused today. And if I were to do so, it would be precisely with the aim of causing a little misunderstanding or a little disturbance which could prove interesting, but this is not the case.
So Pierrette and the Pot-aux-roses, it’s Pierrette who finds the solutions, we can say it like that…
(Q - ??: is this not in the sense of a deception?)
MB: ah no but there’s no trickery on my part. If there's one thing I don't want to do, it's harm you, definitely not. I'm not doing something to you by saying I got you, I'm not trying to get you researchers, I'm trying to refocus you on the real objective of this hunt.
[inaudible]
MB: you have to go deeper, you have to listen to everything in this text, every word is interesting.
(Q - ??: I've heard a lot of nerds talking about the pot-aux-roses, do you have anything to say on that subject? On that association of words , the pejorative side, what is there in France outside of these origins?)
MB: Yeah when you say this association of words, there is no religious connotation. [No] Okay, that reassures me. I find the pot-aux-roses pretty, when you discover the pot-aux-roses, you understand everything
So on the meaning of words I believe that we must be wary of very contemporary meanings, because the vocabulary evolves so much, the practices in terms of text interpretation evolve so much that I think we must be careful not to focus on a meaning rather than another and that more usefully, you have to stick to the primary meaning of the expressions, that's almost always how I work. I don't use many fashionable expressions or terms that are totally misused today. And if I were to do so, it would be precisely with the aim of causing a little misunderstanding or a little disturbance which could prove interesting, but this is not the case.
So Pierrette and the Pot-aux-roses, it’s Pierrette who finds the solutions, we can say it like that…
(Q - ??: is this not in the sense of a deception?)
MB: ah no but there’s no trickery on my part. If there's one thing I don't want to do, it's harm you, definitely not. I'm not doing something to you by saying I got you, I'm not trying to get you researchers, I'm trying to refocus you on the real objective of this hunt.