(Q - ??: when is the continuation of the trial like that, I'm not going to dwell on it?)
MB: The rest of the trial I don't have the exact date in mind, it was postponed for 60 days so I don't know, that already brings us to March. The rest of the trial is that we are always focused on the incident, the conclusions of the incident, which were given produced by the heirs of Max Valentin who requested that the criminal, therefore the complaints, the multiple complaints filed by our “psycho court” of service, Mr. Crolet, therefore that all these complaints be considered before the civil one, therefore the current procedure is canceled purely and simply canceled, stopped that we first consider the complaints of Mr. Crolet, which is therefore an investigation, which is a judgment, et cetera et cetera. So that gives us 2, 3 years of procedure and then we can resume the debates around civil matters, therefore resume the procedure as it is currently taking place.
So that's going to be, I think in 60 days and it seems that's my feeling, that's just my feeling, I'm not sure but it seems that the judge is starting to get a little annoyed. little saying, well guys now we should stop throwing it around in all directions. You should know what you want and so the judge will have to rule on this precise point.
Do we give priority to criminal matters or do we give priority to civil matters? Do we continue the current procedure in clear form or do we give priority to criminal matters? We stop, we cancel the current procedure and we deal with the complaints filed by Mr. Crolet. Or are Mr. Crolet's complaints being left aside for the moment, which would seem to be the trend? And we are going to the end of the current civil approach and we are resolving all the current debates around hunting. Which I would infinitely prefer.
MB: The rest of the trial I don't have the exact date in mind, it was postponed for 60 days so I don't know, that already brings us to March. The rest of the trial is that we are always focused on the incident, the conclusions of the incident, which were given produced by the heirs of Max Valentin who requested that the criminal, therefore the complaints, the multiple complaints filed by our “psycho court” of service, Mr. Crolet, therefore that all these complaints be considered before the civil one, therefore the current procedure is canceled purely and simply canceled, stopped that we first consider the complaints of Mr. Crolet, which is therefore an investigation, which is a judgment, et cetera et cetera. So that gives us 2, 3 years of procedure and then we can resume the debates around civil matters, therefore resume the procedure as it is currently taking place.
So that's going to be, I think in 60 days and it seems that's my feeling, that's just my feeling, I'm not sure but it seems that the judge is starting to get a little annoyed. little saying, well guys now we should stop throwing it around in all directions. You should know what you want and so the judge will have to rule on this precise point.
Do we give priority to criminal matters or do we give priority to civil matters? Do we continue the current procedure in clear form or do we give priority to criminal matters? We stop, we cancel the current procedure and we deal with the complaints filed by Mr. Crolet. Or are Mr. Crolet's complaints being left aside for the moment, which would seem to be the trend? And we are going to the end of the current civil approach and we are resolving all the current debates around hunting. Which I would infinitely prefer.