(Q - ??: this is a bit of what you wanted to show us with the example of the review, this way of trying to dig and get in…)<
/u>
MB: there you go, there you go, we can take others eh, but it's true, when we take an expression and we start to manipulate it a little in all directions and see what it can imply , imply, how we could perceive it, we realize that the instructions are not as obvious as that.
(Q - in fact we were a little surprised by the way, we could see that it was a bit...well, your vision because the review we take this example, there aren't really any standards, there isn't really something in a dictionary that will explain something to us, it happens as if like that, it seems like it was a bit of your own vision and that you wanted to bring us a little and tell us well, you see in the end, we don't all agree according to our own vision, we can go in different paths.)
MB: That’s exactly it! And for all the people who have been interested in this game for 30 years, well, no one today has gone, focused where we should focus and gone to the end of the ideas that can arise from it.< br />
(Q - Xavier: in these cases, for how we manage to channel ourselves precisely because well, we had the example, I stayed with you for 14 hours recently, how we manage to channel, to know where to stop, how to channel ourselves? For example, we had this review, it was a good example, and we fell into something where we had a review with normally something quite classic. when you look at a definition, well I was in the army, I know what a review looks like, but how do we know when we have to stop?)
MB: Have you been reviewed?
(Q – Xavier: yes, yes, I was in 87, I was in Arras, I was reviewed…)
MB: what position were you in, what posture?
(Q – Xavier: watch out!)
MB: Well there you go. Yes, we are talking about all that, so it clearly implies that when we mention an expression, we take it in the strictly military sense, we can take it otherwise. Depending on how you consider it, you have to make a choice. How should I consider this expression and once one has made a choice on how to consider it, one must deduce everything that can be deduced from it.
(Q – Xavier: because we had fallen, you know that the story of the eyes, what are you looking at, that’s where I was a little lost at the end, that is to say the precision, what do you look at, Roc had said we look at everything in there, but no, we look at something, we look in the eyes, you understand, we had the 'I feel like you really want to get us somewhere?)
MB: but I brought you there since you are asking yourself the question…
(Q – Xavier: Ah yes, yes, yes, yes, no but that’s clear, that means that we had, we knew what we had to look at, but I knew, I I don't know where we should because, well, that was just an example. Is it the right one, is it the wrong one? expression.)
MB: I still have to let you search a little, right?
(Q – Xavier: ah yes, you still cleaned up the last time on the last audio, you cleaned up certain expressions and all that. But hey, there’s still something we’re going to do say 3 expressions which rotate, there are always these 3 expressions, there is this one which often wins, but we always have approximately 3 expressions which rotate…)
(Q – nlc: were the 3 expressions you are talking about mentioned by a researcher in the conversation?)
(Q - Xavier: well listen you already know I stayed 14 hours like Michel but I admit that the idea of ??going back to 14:00…)
(Q – nlc: I did the exercise. I found the expression, no problem, eh.)
(Q – Xavier: but everyone says that too, that means I have 2 or 3 who say but it’s not the same each time, that’s the problem .)
MB: listen, listen, whatever expression you retain, in any case, it is an expression which can be taken in different meanings and therefore, you must retain the notion that this expression must cling to your previous work on solutions.
You come to a point where you are confronted with this expression, but you have done a lot before about hunting, you have thought a lot, deduced a lot, found a lot, imagined a lot, it all has to come together. We are still in the whole, we are still in a process which, from A to Z, remains logical.
(Q – Xavier: so there is a link…)
MB: so we must not go in completely absurd directions.
(Q - ??: somewhere, this expression helps to set the record straight?)
MB: so here we are, we're right in the thick of it, we're once again faced with the problem of this hunt "allows us to set the record straight", if I answer I accept the expression, so some will say, he endorsed it, he understood, he responded. But I don't know what that means.
(Q – Exalastro: you took the example of the refrigerator, we had a meaning that is now forgotten originally, I don’t even know if it’s that one, but Mr. refrigerator or Mr. trash or the inventor of all that So there is a big gap between what we know today about our refrigerator in the kitchen and the origin of the expression, in the expression we are looking for, l. acceptance which will make us bind with everything we have already done, is the big gap there too?
Or we're going to stay, I'm thinking about the review, it still remains something visual, I'm going to pass in front of each soldier, I'm fine, if I pass in front of my sentries or in front of my soldiers, )
MB: you like this one, you like the review...whatever the expression, the meaning we should give it, the way we are going to peel it, the way we are going to use remains in line with the usual register of its meanings. It is not taken in a totally new sense that should be sought.
No, no, this expression is taken in a relatively usual sense, but in a relatively usual sense, it can have several meanings, it can lead to several concepts.
(Q – Xavier: So, like the idea of ??the review which gives us both a military side, a review for example, that a mechanic will say okay, I have to go through the vehicle reviewed to see if this sort of thing…)
MB: That's why I find this example interesting because indeed, we can review sentries, we can review a certain number of documents, a certain number of problems, I don't know what, it is an expression which lends itself, with a certain flexibility, to different uses.
(Q – Exalastro: especially the habit of not seeing it in fact and letting it pass by saying to oneself, well they ask me for sentinels waiting for me, I'm going to look for them, obviously that I would like to review them or observe them. It's a bit like that, a bit of a perverted thing, in quotes, to say to myself, well it's natural of course, when they're waiting for me, I'm asked to... I. I don't know how to do anything other than look at them anyway.)
MB: if you stay focused on this expression, yes.
MB: there you go, there you go, we can take others eh, but it's true, when we take an expression and we start to manipulate it a little in all directions and see what it can imply , imply, how we could perceive it, we realize that the instructions are not as obvious as that.
(Q - in fact we were a little surprised by the way, we could see that it was a bit...well, your vision because the review we take this example, there aren't really any standards, there isn't really something in a dictionary that will explain something to us, it happens as if like that, it seems like it was a bit of your own vision and that you wanted to bring us a little and tell us well, you see in the end, we don't all agree according to our own vision, we can go in different paths.)
MB: That’s exactly it! And for all the people who have been interested in this game for 30 years, well, no one today has gone, focused where we should focus and gone to the end of the ideas that can arise from it.< br />
(Q - Xavier: in these cases, for how we manage to channel ourselves precisely because well, we had the example, I stayed with you for 14 hours recently, how we manage to channel, to know where to stop, how to channel ourselves? For example, we had this review, it was a good example, and we fell into something where we had a review with normally something quite classic. when you look at a definition, well I was in the army, I know what a review looks like, but how do we know when we have to stop?)
MB: Have you been reviewed?
(Q – Xavier: yes, yes, I was in 87, I was in Arras, I was reviewed…)
MB: what position were you in, what posture?
(Q – Xavier: watch out!)
MB: Well there you go. Yes, we are talking about all that, so it clearly implies that when we mention an expression, we take it in the strictly military sense, we can take it otherwise. Depending on how you consider it, you have to make a choice. How should I consider this expression and once one has made a choice on how to consider it, one must deduce everything that can be deduced from it.
(Q – Xavier: because we had fallen, you know that the story of the eyes, what are you looking at, that’s where I was a little lost at the end, that is to say the precision, what do you look at, Roc had said we look at everything in there, but no, we look at something, we look in the eyes, you understand, we had the 'I feel like you really want to get us somewhere?)
MB: but I brought you there since you are asking yourself the question…
(Q – Xavier: Ah yes, yes, yes, yes, no but that’s clear, that means that we had, we knew what we had to look at, but I knew, I I don't know where we should because, well, that was just an example. Is it the right one, is it the wrong one? expression.)
MB: I still have to let you search a little, right?
(Q – Xavier: ah yes, you still cleaned up the last time on the last audio, you cleaned up certain expressions and all that. But hey, there’s still something we’re going to do say 3 expressions which rotate, there are always these 3 expressions, there is this one which often wins, but we always have approximately 3 expressions which rotate…)
(Q – nlc: were the 3 expressions you are talking about mentioned by a researcher in the conversation?)
(Q - Xavier: well listen you already know I stayed 14 hours like Michel but I admit that the idea of ??going back to 14:00…)
(Q – nlc: I did the exercise. I found the expression, no problem, eh.)
(Q – Xavier: but everyone says that too, that means I have 2 or 3 who say but it’s not the same each time, that’s the problem .)
MB: listen, listen, whatever expression you retain, in any case, it is an expression which can be taken in different meanings and therefore, you must retain the notion that this expression must cling to your previous work on solutions.
You come to a point where you are confronted with this expression, but you have done a lot before about hunting, you have thought a lot, deduced a lot, found a lot, imagined a lot, it all has to come together. We are still in the whole, we are still in a process which, from A to Z, remains logical.
(Q – Xavier: so there is a link…)
MB: so we must not go in completely absurd directions.
(Q - ??: somewhere, this expression helps to set the record straight?)
MB: so here we are, we're right in the thick of it, we're once again faced with the problem of this hunt "allows us to set the record straight", if I answer I accept the expression, so some will say, he endorsed it, he understood, he responded. But I don't know what that means.
(Q – Exalastro: you took the example of the refrigerator, we had a meaning that is now forgotten originally, I don’t even know if it’s that one, but Mr. refrigerator or Mr. trash or the inventor of all that So there is a big gap between what we know today about our refrigerator in the kitchen and the origin of the expression, in the expression we are looking for, l. acceptance which will make us bind with everything we have already done, is the big gap there too?
Or we're going to stay, I'm thinking about the review, it still remains something visual, I'm going to pass in front of each soldier, I'm fine, if I pass in front of my sentries or in front of my soldiers, )
MB: you like this one, you like the review...whatever the expression, the meaning we should give it, the way we are going to peel it, the way we are going to use remains in line with the usual register of its meanings. It is not taken in a totally new sense that should be sought.
No, no, this expression is taken in a relatively usual sense, but in a relatively usual sense, it can have several meanings, it can lead to several concepts.
(Q – Xavier: So, like the idea of ??the review which gives us both a military side, a review for example, that a mechanic will say okay, I have to go through the vehicle reviewed to see if this sort of thing…)
MB: That's why I find this example interesting because indeed, we can review sentries, we can review a certain number of documents, a certain number of problems, I don't know what, it is an expression which lends itself, with a certain flexibility, to different uses.
(Q – Exalastro: especially the habit of not seeing it in fact and letting it pass by saying to oneself, well they ask me for sentinels waiting for me, I'm going to look for them, obviously that I would like to review them or observe them. It's a bit like that, a bit of a perverted thing, in quotes, to say to myself, well it's natural of course, when they're waiting for me, I'm asked to... I. I don't know how to do anything other than look at them anyway.)
MB: if you stay focused on this expression, yes.