(Q - Redeye63: for example there is a person who miraculously manages to find all the solutions...)
MB: but it's not a miracle but it's not a miracle at all! It's logic...
(Q - Redeye63: who has managed to progress well in relation to the game and therefore through perseverance and as a result he finds the whole path and finds the perfect thing super. But for example, I take an image, we will say that it manages to decode Bourges, by chance, and in fact when we decode Bourges, it decodes the ""b"", the ""o"", the ""u"", the "r", the "g", the "e", but it does not decode the "s" does that necessarily call into question, we will say, the validity of these solutions. ?)
MB: no, I'll tell you why. The solutions lead, whether we like it or not, it's still the principle, lead to an area, the cache is in this area so, someone who has found all the solutions will arrive in the right area. From there, I'm not going to take it easy to say but explain to me, how you found the area etc., I'm not paranoid either, as an organizer if I have a winner I'm delighted , so I'm not going, I'm not going to go... the guy tells me well I found bourg, the s I hadn't found it, but I still left Bourges, well ok great that’s well done! I'm not that level.
The crucial point of all these discussions, which means that today we have such a problem in front of us, comes from the fact that the rules of the game were written by a literary person, in this case Max Valentin, he had nice to pretend that he had lawyers write that, it's false, it's not legal language at all, it's literary language, "will be deemed to be the winner" and then what else, we'd think we were at the Goncourt price. I mean it's not at all the atmosphere of a settlement, no one is deemed to be a winner in a settlement, a real settlement is declared a winner, that's how it is, it's no other way.< br /> So he wrote poetry or literature, so we have a regulation which allows a certain, which opens the door, which allows that's saying a lot, but which opens the door to certain interpretations into which some people rush. .
That's our problem for the day, but the reality is that the super solution gives, I repeat, a precise point, a precise point that means that we are at exactly one [Note Bioposis: at 47: 00, what was he going to say...?], we can stick a needle in that place, we are on it, it gives a precise point, from there, someone who has found the solution digs he takes out the countermark he wins. I'm not either, I mean I'm not here to be an arch purist of solutions etc, the guy who managed to complete his journey, who finds the area, who finds the cache, he won he n There's no doubt about that!
But if he finds it with a detector, and he tells me she was there but he can't explain to me why she's there, but I'll say stop, you haven't won.
Because once again, the super solution gives a precise point, if we are not able to give the precise, precise, precise, precise point, it is because we have not found the super solution and for The test is there for me.
Good luck, we have to go!
MB: but it's not a miracle but it's not a miracle at all! It's logic...
(Q - Redeye63: who has managed to progress well in relation to the game and therefore through perseverance and as a result he finds the whole path and finds the perfect thing super. But for example, I take an image, we will say that it manages to decode Bourges, by chance, and in fact when we decode Bourges, it decodes the ""b"", the ""o"", the ""u"", the "r", the "g", the "e", but it does not decode the "s" does that necessarily call into question, we will say, the validity of these solutions. ?)
MB: no, I'll tell you why. The solutions lead, whether we like it or not, it's still the principle, lead to an area, the cache is in this area so, someone who has found all the solutions will arrive in the right area. From there, I'm not going to take it easy to say but explain to me, how you found the area etc., I'm not paranoid either, as an organizer if I have a winner I'm delighted , so I'm not going, I'm not going to go... the guy tells me well I found bourg, the s I hadn't found it, but I still left Bourges, well ok great that’s well done! I'm not that level.
The crucial point of all these discussions, which means that today we have such a problem in front of us, comes from the fact that the rules of the game were written by a literary person, in this case Max Valentin, he had nice to pretend that he had lawyers write that, it's false, it's not legal language at all, it's literary language, "will be deemed to be the winner" and then what else, we'd think we were at the Goncourt price. I mean it's not at all the atmosphere of a settlement, no one is deemed to be a winner in a settlement, a real settlement is declared a winner, that's how it is, it's no other way.< br /> So he wrote poetry or literature, so we have a regulation which allows a certain, which opens the door, which allows that's saying a lot, but which opens the door to certain interpretations into which some people rush. .
That's our problem for the day, but the reality is that the super solution gives, I repeat, a precise point, a precise point that means that we are at exactly one [Note Bioposis: at 47: 00, what was he going to say...?], we can stick a needle in that place, we are on it, it gives a precise point, from there, someone who has found the solution digs he takes out the countermark he wins. I'm not either, I mean I'm not here to be an arch purist of solutions etc, the guy who managed to complete his journey, who finds the area, who finds the cache, he won he n There's no doubt about that!
But if he finds it with a detector, and he tells me she was there but he can't explain to me why she's there, but I'll say stop, you haven't won.
Because once again, the super solution gives a precise point, if we are not able to give the precise, precise, precise, precise point, it is because we have not found the super solution and for The test is there for me.
Good luck, we have to go!