(Q - Tina: I'm sorry Michel so I got a little angry but it's not against you, it's against all the mechanics that this game can infuse...)
MB : but the problem is not at the level of the resolution of cryptos, that remains an exercise which is necessarily, which must be done if we want to understand, okay. That's understandable, it's measurable, we can pin it down.
Where the difficulty begins is what do we do with what we have found and that's where it happens!
This is where influence peddling becomes considerable, this is where certain people want to impose their point of view, some people are convinced, others not, it is from the moment when the decryptions are made, I completely understand this exercise Tina, there may be difficulties, it may take time but once we have done these decryptions, then we have to learn something from it, we have found things, words , cities, don't know what, what do we do with that?
(Q - Tina: but you felt it well on this discord, you felt it well with the A2Co, you felt it well with the elders, you felt it well with the close guard, indeed there are generally accepted things, and in these generally accepted things, there is also this
concept of reflection, there is not only this concept of resolution, there is this concept of reflection so on generally accepted cryptos, I agree with you, I think that everything is Ok, I was very happy to find Proserpine, while I just had the puzzle, I didn't have the code, I saw that I was dealing with people who had knowledge and skills in crypto where I couldn't compete.< br /> That is to say that I cannot compete in front of the people who deciphered the 580 in a few months, it took me four years, when I saw that it was on the net it really blew my mind , but hey it doesn't matter.
But beyond that, somewhere in my questioning and in your answer, you implicitly confirm perhaps or not, I leave you the possibility of denying of course, that the generally accepted cryptos are correct, but that the interpretation that 'we actually, haven't we figured it out?)
MB : but the problem is not at the level of the resolution of cryptos, that remains an exercise which is necessarily, which must be done if we want to understand, okay. That's understandable, it's measurable, we can pin it down.
Where the difficulty begins is what do we do with what we have found and that's where it happens!
This is where influence peddling becomes considerable, this is where certain people want to impose their point of view, some people are convinced, others not, it is from the moment when the decryptions are made, I completely understand this exercise Tina, there may be difficulties, it may take time but once we have done these decryptions, then we have to learn something from it, we have found things, words , cities, don't know what, what do we do with that?
(Q - Tina: but you felt it well on this discord, you felt it well with the A2Co, you felt it well with the elders, you felt it well with the close guard, indeed there are generally accepted things, and in these generally accepted things, there is also this
concept of reflection, there is not only this concept of resolution, there is this concept of reflection so on generally accepted cryptos, I agree with you, I think that everything is Ok, I was very happy to find Proserpine, while I just had the puzzle, I didn't have the code, I saw that I was dealing with people who had knowledge and skills in crypto where I couldn't compete.< br /> That is to say that I cannot compete in front of the people who deciphered the 580 in a few months, it took me four years, when I saw that it was on the net it really blew my mind , but hey it doesn't matter.
But beyond that, somewhere in my questioning and in your answer, you implicitly confirm perhaps or not, I leave you the possibility of denying of course, that the generally accepted cryptos are correct, but that the interpretation that 'we actually, haven't we figured it out?)