(Q - ??: I always come back to the remainders, can we really speak of decryption or rather of synthesis or summary, once we reach the end?)
i>
MB : so I respond with my words because you speak with yours. As I know that everyone is trying to pull worms out of my nose, inevitably I also create my own vocabulary as you create yours.
I said yesterday, the remainders are a result, something that happens when the time comes. I cannot tell you that the remainders are not elements which can be detected along the way [Note Bioposis: surely one negation too many with what follows?].
(Q - ??: you don't have the right to say it or you can't know?)
MB : I don't have the right to say what, what are the remainders?
(Q - ??: no, can we get an idea along the way?)
MB : We cannot have an idea of ??the remainders along the way, it is impossible, there is no way of getting an idea of ??the remainders along the way, none, I will answer you bluntly, it there is no possibility of detecting a remainder along the way, we can only detect them on arrival, when we have the zone.
(Q - ??: so it is impossible to obtain these elements, as the term used, in one's bag during our decryptions, throughout the adventure...we do not put things aside while saying...)
MB : no it's not the goodies of a video game, no, no, not at all, it has nothing to do with what you pick up along the way when you play Mario or something, no, No. I'm laughing but it's absolutely impossible, it has nothing to do with that.
You are in a treasure hunt which was designed by a guy who hid something, who made a sort of treasure hunt, who said well here you go, you have to start from a point and get to the 'other, once you are there, you will have to count the steps, the feet, the things, the things, I don't know, like any treasure hunt!
(Q- ??: I seem to remember that Max remains of decryptions, if I use the terms correctly...?)
MB : it's because he was cornered by the players' questions but the Minitel process was perverse, because he made money with it so he was obliged to answer, the players took pleasure in it, some , we know, even went broke or almost broke with the Minitel because it cost a fortune, and so we were in a completely perverse system where there was an obligation to respond.
So at a given moment, he gave answers, he tried to conceptualize this notion, although it cannot be, we cannot define what the remainders are, they are elements which will give us be useful when you arrive at the right place. There's no point looking for them, I assure you that what I'm telling you is true, there's no point looking for them, you won't find them.
(Q - ??: but once I'm at the end, that we're in the zone, I have to look for them?)
MB : yes but there your logic will no longer be the same at all, since you will have the area, so your thinking will be much more specific because much less general.
For the moment you don't have a zone, you have all of France, minus a strip of 100 kilometers from the coast, everything else can be anywhere, so you can't target anything. When you are sure of the zone, you will say to yourself I am sure of the zone, your mind will not work at all in the same way.
The elements that will appear, they will be much more precise, you will be much quicker to capture them, or simply be able to capture them when you were not before.
(Q - ??: I understand but in summary, we must validate a specific point in the area, like confirmation of a location? To be sure that we are in the right place... )
MB : yes....there you go.
(Q - ??: so these are the remaining items that will confirm on our map that we are in the right place?)
MB : not at all, when you are in the area, you will understand what the concept of remainder is, you will say well now that I am in the area, what do I do? and then you will say "ha well yes", that's what will make the elements appear to you as being leftovers, but beforehand you cannot detect them, you cannot see them beforehand. This is why I rebel a little against...
(Q - ??: no, no, I'm talking to you about the case where we are in our zone...)
MB : in this case you will not ask the question...if you are in the right area, it is not me that you will ask the question of the remainders, it is up to you because you will say to yourself and now what do I do and it's going to be great, believe me!
(Q - ??: Michel, you know the solutions, you understand that we have 30 years of thinking in our brains...)
MB : wait, how long have you been looking for?
(Q - ??: it's been around ten years)
MB : so already it's not 30 years. We must not make a conglomeration of what has happened over the past 30 years, because once again, the players from the beginning are in a different position since they have had to deal with max, where you, you talk with me, they talked with Max, something else happened for them, you shouldn't lump everything together, you've been looking for 10 years, it's considerable, I'm not at all underestimating this duration which is important, but for 10 years you have operated in relation to criteria, to reference elements that I try to, well let's put it into perspective, I was going to say to invalidate, no but to put it into perspective today.
I want to help you put into perspective the reference elements that were used during these 10 years to tell you, now try to see things in a more open way, get out of the shackles of what you may have read or accepted and find your freedom again. of mind, your objectivity, or subjectivity at times for that matter, and make up your own mind.
(Q - ??: that's what I'm doing, that's why I'm still asking you questions to make sure I've understood what you're explaining...)
MB : yeah, that's what you're trying to do, but you're talking to me about leftovers "madits method", I'm telling you leftovers, as defined in madits, don't exist, it's a concept that Max was forced to articulate, I can't tell you better anyway, he was forced to articulate it, he was forced to respond.
The people who asked him questions paid 3 or 4 francs per minute, it's as if you, today, pay 2 euros per minute, imagine that you talk to me at 2 euros per minute, I have an interest in you answer otherwise I will really get hated!
So he was in this situation, so he answered things, he articulated concepts which are beyond the simple necessity of the players since they do not need that to progress in the hunt. But he answered that because the questions were pouring in, like that with me at one point and it absolutely had to be answered.
I tell you don't take that into account, don't look for leftovers along the way, you need to get a clear idea of ??the area and when you are sure of your area, when you say to yourself "good god, good god it's there and it can't be anywhere else"", at that moment you will understand.
MB : so I respond with my words because you speak with yours. As I know that everyone is trying to pull worms out of my nose, inevitably I also create my own vocabulary as you create yours.
I said yesterday, the remainders are a result, something that happens when the time comes. I cannot tell you that the remainders are not elements which can be detected along the way [Note Bioposis: surely one negation too many with what follows?].
(Q - ??: you don't have the right to say it or you can't know?)
MB : I don't have the right to say what, what are the remainders?
(Q - ??: no, can we get an idea along the way?)
MB : We cannot have an idea of ??the remainders along the way, it is impossible, there is no way of getting an idea of ??the remainders along the way, none, I will answer you bluntly, it there is no possibility of detecting a remainder along the way, we can only detect them on arrival, when we have the zone.
(Q - ??: so it is impossible to obtain these elements, as the term used, in one's bag during our decryptions, throughout the adventure...we do not put things aside while saying...)
MB : no it's not the goodies of a video game, no, no, not at all, it has nothing to do with what you pick up along the way when you play Mario or something, no, No. I'm laughing but it's absolutely impossible, it has nothing to do with that.
You are in a treasure hunt which was designed by a guy who hid something, who made a sort of treasure hunt, who said well here you go, you have to start from a point and get to the 'other, once you are there, you will have to count the steps, the feet, the things, the things, I don't know, like any treasure hunt!
(Q- ??: I seem to remember that Max remains of decryptions, if I use the terms correctly...?)
MB : it's because he was cornered by the players' questions but the Minitel process was perverse, because he made money with it so he was obliged to answer, the players took pleasure in it, some , we know, even went broke or almost broke with the Minitel because it cost a fortune, and so we were in a completely perverse system where there was an obligation to respond.
So at a given moment, he gave answers, he tried to conceptualize this notion, although it cannot be, we cannot define what the remainders are, they are elements which will give us be useful when you arrive at the right place. There's no point looking for them, I assure you that what I'm telling you is true, there's no point looking for them, you won't find them.
(Q - ??: but once I'm at the end, that we're in the zone, I have to look for them?)
MB : yes but there your logic will no longer be the same at all, since you will have the area, so your thinking will be much more specific because much less general.
For the moment you don't have a zone, you have all of France, minus a strip of 100 kilometers from the coast, everything else can be anywhere, so you can't target anything. When you are sure of the zone, you will say to yourself I am sure of the zone, your mind will not work at all in the same way.
The elements that will appear, they will be much more precise, you will be much quicker to capture them, or simply be able to capture them when you were not before.
(Q - ??: I understand but in summary, we must validate a specific point in the area, like confirmation of a location? To be sure that we are in the right place... )
MB : yes....there you go.
(Q - ??: so these are the remaining items that will confirm on our map that we are in the right place?)
MB : not at all, when you are in the area, you will understand what the concept of remainder is, you will say well now that I am in the area, what do I do? and then you will say "ha well yes", that's what will make the elements appear to you as being leftovers, but beforehand you cannot detect them, you cannot see them beforehand. This is why I rebel a little against...
(Q - ??: no, no, I'm talking to you about the case where we are in our zone...)
MB : in this case you will not ask the question...if you are in the right area, it is not me that you will ask the question of the remainders, it is up to you because you will say to yourself and now what do I do and it's going to be great, believe me!
(Q - ??: Michel, you know the solutions, you understand that we have 30 years of thinking in our brains...)
MB : wait, how long have you been looking for?
(Q - ??: it's been around ten years)
MB : so already it's not 30 years. We must not make a conglomeration of what has happened over the past 30 years, because once again, the players from the beginning are in a different position since they have had to deal with max, where you, you talk with me, they talked with Max, something else happened for them, you shouldn't lump everything together, you've been looking for 10 years, it's considerable, I'm not at all underestimating this duration which is important, but for 10 years you have operated in relation to criteria, to reference elements that I try to, well let's put it into perspective, I was going to say to invalidate, no but to put it into perspective today.
I want to help you put into perspective the reference elements that were used during these 10 years to tell you, now try to see things in a more open way, get out of the shackles of what you may have read or accepted and find your freedom again. of mind, your objectivity, or subjectivity at times for that matter, and make up your own mind.
(Q - ??: that's what I'm doing, that's why I'm still asking you questions to make sure I've understood what you're explaining...)
MB : yeah, that's what you're trying to do, but you're talking to me about leftovers "madits method", I'm telling you leftovers, as defined in madits, don't exist, it's a concept that Max was forced to articulate, I can't tell you better anyway, he was forced to articulate it, he was forced to respond.
The people who asked him questions paid 3 or 4 francs per minute, it's as if you, today, pay 2 euros per minute, imagine that you talk to me at 2 euros per minute, I have an interest in you answer otherwise I will really get hated!
So he was in this situation, so he answered things, he articulated concepts which are beyond the simple necessity of the players since they do not need that to progress in the hunt. But he answered that because the questions were pouring in, like that with me at one point and it absolutely had to be answered.
I tell you don't take that into account, don't look for leftovers along the way, you need to get a clear idea of ??the area and when you are sure of your area, when you say to yourself "good god, good god it's there and it can't be anywhere else"", at that moment you will understand.