(Q - bioposis: you said that a Larousse is enough, do you maintain this statement?)
MB : I feel that I'm in the hot seat... yes I maintain it, we don't need specialized works, things, stuff, it's open to everyone to explore a subject a little more than another, that may help to support one's point of view,...but overall I think that one Larousse is enough. [Big moment of silence]
(Q - Tina: everyone is dead!)
MB : but no! Why is everyone dead? There are a lot of things in a Larousse, that's what surprises me a lot when we discuss these things, I know a lot of theories that I can see in private messages and which, in fact, go back to loads calculations, lots of things. I'm still a fairly honest person, in fact, when I say that Max was a literary person he didn't work at the CNRS, so there was a given moment when it wasn't in his area of ??expertise, that's me. stick to that, I said it from the start (the Robert works very well too...).
I am a divisive character, I know it, and perhaps I have not always taken things the right way, but everyone will be able to form an opinion in the relatively near future, and perhaps we will understand this better. what is happening and what happened, the way I operate but in any case, about the things I say about the puzzles and the game, I try to be extremely honest with you. I too have experienced for several months the discord, the impact, the scope, the consequences that my words could have, humorous traits, a little implication, 3 ellipsis, so I I try to be very careful because my intention is above all not to mislead you or make you imagine things, I think that you imagine enough without me, and I am paying more and more attention to the way in which I can answer certain things, and in particular on the history of Larousse I thought for a few seconds before saying yes but I say yes Larousse is enough to solve the hunt.
MB : I feel that I'm in the hot seat... yes I maintain it, we don't need specialized works, things, stuff, it's open to everyone to explore a subject a little more than another, that may help to support one's point of view,...but overall I think that one Larousse is enough. [Big moment of silence]
(Q - Tina: everyone is dead!)
MB : but no! Why is everyone dead? There are a lot of things in a Larousse, that's what surprises me a lot when we discuss these things, I know a lot of theories that I can see in private messages and which, in fact, go back to loads calculations, lots of things. I'm still a fairly honest person, in fact, when I say that Max was a literary person he didn't work at the CNRS, so there was a given moment when it wasn't in his area of ??expertise, that's me. stick to that, I said it from the start (the Robert works very well too...).
I am a divisive character, I know it, and perhaps I have not always taken things the right way, but everyone will be able to form an opinion in the relatively near future, and perhaps we will understand this better. what is happening and what happened, the way I operate but in any case, about the things I say about the puzzles and the game, I try to be extremely honest with you. I too have experienced for several months the discord, the impact, the scope, the consequences that my words could have, humorous traits, a little implication, 3 ellipsis, so I I try to be very careful because my intention is above all not to mislead you or make you imagine things, I think that you imagine enough without me, and I am paying more and more attention to the way in which I can answer certain things, and in particular on the history of Larousse I thought for a few seconds before saying yes but I say yes Larousse is enough to solve the hunt.