(Q - apollo: the goal in puzzles is to find places, always, practically, in almost all puzzles...)
MB : yes, not all but the majority are places of course.
(Q - ??: in the 780, most of us don't have a location...)
MB : no, no, I'm not saying that there is a place to find in all the puzzles, but most of them are places that have to be found of course. It’s places, it’s directions, it’s distances.
(Q - ??: can we find places we already know?)
MB : what does that mean about the places you know?
(Q - ??: there is a big blocking point, it is in 560, the becalmed Nave, do we already know it or is it the path that is important or the drop-off point which is important?)
MB : ""do you already know her?"", ""I have no idea, if you already know her, why are you asking me that?""
(Q - ??: have we seen her in the hunt before?)
MB : ah, I’m not going to tell you that! You would like me to answer a question like that quite simply!
(Q - apollo: for me we already find it in 600 and we actually find it in 560...)
(Q - Gringos: but they don't link together, that's what bothers me, why didn't he do a direct sequence, why skip 2 puzzles?)
(Q - apollo: to give other information?)
(Q - Gringos: perhaps quite simply because we do not have to make a coherent journey which goes from point "A" to point "B" as for Orval but we will rather draw lines on the map and that it is not necessarily lines that make a long line, the line is not continuous...)
(Q - apollo: there are traps in a treasure hunt...)
MB : well yes everything is not clear obviously...
MB : yes, not all but the majority are places of course.
(Q - ??: in the 780, most of us don't have a location...)
MB : no, no, I'm not saying that there is a place to find in all the puzzles, but most of them are places that have to be found of course. It’s places, it’s directions, it’s distances.
(Q - ??: can we find places we already know?)
MB : what does that mean about the places you know?
(Q - ??: there is a big blocking point, it is in 560, the becalmed Nave, do we already know it or is it the path that is important or the drop-off point which is important?)
MB : ""do you already know her?"", ""I have no idea, if you already know her, why are you asking me that?""
(Q - ??: have we seen her in the hunt before?)
MB : ah, I’m not going to tell you that! You would like me to answer a question like that quite simply!
(Q - apollo: for me we already find it in 600 and we actually find it in 560...)
(Q - Gringos: but they don't link together, that's what bothers me, why didn't he do a direct sequence, why skip 2 puzzles?)
(Q - apollo: to give other information?)
(Q - Gringos: perhaps quite simply because we do not have to make a coherent journey which goes from point "A" to point "B" as for Orval but we will rather draw lines on the map and that it is not necessarily lines that make a long line, the line is not continuous...)
(Q - apollo: there are traps in a treasure hunt...)
MB : well yes everything is not clear obviously...