(Q - Tina: it seems clear to me but just now, in fact, you put us in doubt, I understood like that..thank you Michel)<
br />
MB : you're welcome. Well there you go, there's been a whole... there's a whole history of these enigmas, there are a lot of theories, I think there are enough, I doubt that many new theories will appear, or else it will become even more complicated, but in the middle of these theories, my role is not to sort it out, I am much more there... I tried to do it to try to give you, how would I say -I, a little more guidance on how to approach, rather than the themes themselves.
I think in general that there is a habit of making things more complex which has been obvious for a very long time in this hunt and it is perhaps not the best thing. But I said that, I wrote it and that’s it.
And on the questions, there's no point asking me questions like that with 1st, 2nd, 3rd degree tips, because I can't understand, you shouldn't deduce from my answers that I can respond in the same way. way in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd degree, it's impossible, I always respond in the 1st degree, or I respond with a joke which is something else.
(Q - Tina: but Max said the same thing, that he answered in the 1st degree too?)
MB : yes I believe it, well in any case in many of his answers that I have seen, I confirm that it was 1st degree...
(Q - ??: I'll just make a remark, in fact I think that from what you've just said, it's going to make a lot of people cringe, because photography is a track shared by quite a few people and if you say that knowledge of photography is not necessary, somewhere, that means that you indicated to certain people that their track was not good, and that's just a note, this is not my lead, it's just something that might make people cringe...)
MB : well listen, sorry if I make some people cringe, that is not my intention but I respond according to a logic which is that of the organizer who says, precise knowledge in photography is not necessary, afterward everyone deduces what they want.
MB : you're welcome. Well there you go, there's been a whole... there's a whole history of these enigmas, there are a lot of theories, I think there are enough, I doubt that many new theories will appear, or else it will become even more complicated, but in the middle of these theories, my role is not to sort it out, I am much more there... I tried to do it to try to give you, how would I say -I, a little more guidance on how to approach, rather than the themes themselves.
I think in general that there is a habit of making things more complex which has been obvious for a very long time in this hunt and it is perhaps not the best thing. But I said that, I wrote it and that’s it.
And on the questions, there's no point asking me questions like that with 1st, 2nd, 3rd degree tips, because I can't understand, you shouldn't deduce from my answers that I can respond in the same way. way in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd degree, it's impossible, I always respond in the 1st degree, or I respond with a joke which is something else.
(Q - Tina: but Max said the same thing, that he answered in the 1st degree too?)
MB : yes I believe it, well in any case in many of his answers that I have seen, I confirm that it was 1st degree...
(Q - ??: I'll just make a remark, in fact I think that from what you've just said, it's going to make a lot of people cringe, because photography is a track shared by quite a few people and if you say that knowledge of photography is not necessary, somewhere, that means that you indicated to certain people that their track was not good, and that's just a note, this is not my lead, it's just something that might make people cringe...)
MB : well listen, sorry if I make some people cringe, that is not my intention but I respond according to a logic which is that of the organizer who says, precise knowledge in photography is not necessary, afterward everyone deduces what they want.