(Q – immortal tofu: but Michel, my understanding of it is that the fact of, so I may be wrong, but the fact of taking a very geographical image, of
fly over…tends in fact to an understanding of, we draw lines, fly over things on a map, but in fact the image that you use which is very geographical, a plane which flies and which flies over…, ultimately of what
I seem to understand, you, you are talking more about saying we skim over the puzzles in general, we skim over the game in general and we miss things and if we are not told, you should look at that place in your journey.
should see something, well in fact it's this image that you use, but as it's an image which is very geographical, I have the impression that the overall understanding is very... ah yes so it's
is on the map, we draw a line we pass over the geographical area of ??the game… is that the misunderstanding?)
MB : yes it's on the card, because in my opinion you need a card to participate in this game, at least one, we know today that we obviously need two, but in any case from the moment where we use a map, we fly over it, we have a map of France, we fly over France, so there are things we go over and we don't necessarily stop there, that was my initial idea of 'where the parallel which seemed very relevant to me, but I swear to you that I will do it again, with Greenland.
Because I was flying over, I was above and it was below and if the pilot hadn't told me well look down I wouldn't have seen anything
(Q – Shadow: that means that the lines are important if we have to do a course…)
MB : I didn't talk about lines, I said we pass over certain things when we go all the way, we hover over certain places and we don't necessarily see them, that was really the image, well I I have the feeling of being clear, I try to be explicit in my comments, I don't know, then we understand each other, we don't understand each other, I don't know...
(Q – Roc: there were two really distinct understandings of this announcement that you made, the understanding that tofu said earlier that we skim over the enigmas but somewhere in the enigmas we do not see the zone and the other understanding is that we fly over, we walk on the map and we fly over the zone and
[Cut MICHEL]
MB : come on Roc let’s do it again for the technique…)
(Q – Roc then we have two interpretations of what you said about Greenland, the tofu interpretation which says we fly over the enigmas and we pass, we cross the area without seeing it and the another interpretation is the geographical interpretation, we pass over the area, vertically without seeing it and without stopping there, on the map, so which of the 2 is the right one?)
MB : you're all still monstrous, you're monstrous, we fly over the puzzles without seeing the area it's seeing the area where we pass over the map without seeing the area, wait what's the difference? No, but honestly, do you realize to what extent you are, but you are twisted, but you are completely twisted in your reasoning, I am just telling you that at a given moment, in the course of the game
(Q – Isidore: but we are not obliged to see them it is necessary that it is indicated that we must see them, we perhaps pass over them, without being informed of the thing...…)
MB : it's been more than 6 months since Isidore and I disagreed and well today we agree ah thank you
(Q – Roc: Michel you said that you were a simple guy, that you say things simply, clearly and so when you said we fly over the area vertically without seeing it and we stop further away but it's clear it's geographical that we're passing, several researchers pass over the area but don't stop there and they don't even see it.
(Q – Syn: several researchers go to Dabo, but they don’t stop, they go elsewhere afterwards…)
(Q – Sylvain: thank you for the translation Syn it’s clearer…)
MB : it's complicated, damn, how complicated is it to speak the same language...I torture the households by telling myself but what do they do, how do they manage to not understand what I'm telling them. There are things that seem so obvious to me. It is an image which means that in the course of the hunt, the deciphering of the enigmas leads you, whether on the map or in the enigmas, as you wish, to fly over certain areas and therefore to pass through certain places, because that to fly over you have to pass by, to pass by certain places to which you are perhaps not paying the attention you should. Is that clear?
(Q – Sylvain: ah yes you are clear there, but yes you are very clear)
MB : but we can understand it in different ways…
(Q - ??: Michel to take a concrete example, for example I go from Paris to Marseille, I pass over the Creuse for example, that means that what I don't see is 'is the Creuse?)
MB : or a few...or a place in the Creuse perhaps... For example we agree, don't see a clue there, hello everyone do we agree? we agree ? Because what’s more, the Creuse is not trivial, you would have said the Bassin d’Arcachon or Lus la Croix Haute, it was more trivial…
MB : yes it's on the card, because in my opinion you need a card to participate in this game, at least one, we know today that we obviously need two, but in any case from the moment where we use a map, we fly over it, we have a map of France, we fly over France, so there are things we go over and we don't necessarily stop there, that was my initial idea of 'where the parallel which seemed very relevant to me, but I swear to you that I will do it again, with Greenland.
Because I was flying over, I was above and it was below and if the pilot hadn't told me well look down I wouldn't have seen anything
(Q – Shadow: that means that the lines are important if we have to do a course…)
MB : I didn't talk about lines, I said we pass over certain things when we go all the way, we hover over certain places and we don't necessarily see them, that was really the image, well I I have the feeling of being clear, I try to be explicit in my comments, I don't know, then we understand each other, we don't understand each other, I don't know...
(Q – Roc: there were two really distinct understandings of this announcement that you made, the understanding that tofu said earlier that we skim over the enigmas but somewhere in the enigmas we do not see the zone and the other understanding is that we fly over, we walk on the map and we fly over the zone and
[Cut MICHEL]
MB : come on Roc let’s do it again for the technique…)
(Q – Roc then we have two interpretations of what you said about Greenland, the tofu interpretation which says we fly over the enigmas and we pass, we cross the area without seeing it and the another interpretation is the geographical interpretation, we pass over the area, vertically without seeing it and without stopping there, on the map, so which of the 2 is the right one?)
MB : you're all still monstrous, you're monstrous, we fly over the puzzles without seeing the area it's seeing the area where we pass over the map without seeing the area, wait what's the difference? No, but honestly, do you realize to what extent you are, but you are twisted, but you are completely twisted in your reasoning, I am just telling you that at a given moment, in the course of the game
(Q – Isidore: but we are not obliged to see them it is necessary that it is indicated that we must see them, we perhaps pass over them, without being informed of the thing...…)
MB : it's been more than 6 months since Isidore and I disagreed and well today we agree ah thank you
(Q – Roc: Michel you said that you were a simple guy, that you say things simply, clearly and so when you said we fly over the area vertically without seeing it and we stop further away but it's clear it's geographical that we're passing, several researchers pass over the area but don't stop there and they don't even see it.
(Q – Syn: several researchers go to Dabo, but they don’t stop, they go elsewhere afterwards…)
(Q – Sylvain: thank you for the translation Syn it’s clearer…)
MB : it's complicated, damn, how complicated is it to speak the same language...I torture the households by telling myself but what do they do, how do they manage to not understand what I'm telling them. There are things that seem so obvious to me. It is an image which means that in the course of the hunt, the deciphering of the enigmas leads you, whether on the map or in the enigmas, as you wish, to fly over certain areas and therefore to pass through certain places, because that to fly over you have to pass by, to pass by certain places to which you are perhaps not paying the attention you should. Is that clear?
(Q – Sylvain: ah yes you are clear there, but yes you are very clear)
MB : but we can understand it in different ways…
(Q - ??: Michel to take a concrete example, for example I go from Paris to Marseille, I pass over the Creuse for example, that means that what I don't see is 'is the Creuse?)
MB : or a few...or a place in the Creuse perhaps... For example we agree, don't see a clue there, hello everyone do we agree? we agree ? Because what’s more, the Creuse is not trivial, you would have said the Bassin d’Arcachon or Lus la Croix Haute, it was more trivial…