(Q – nlc: it is vicious, because he really finally cleared up the enigma, there is not much. So, not only is there not much
, but there have been so many things, in the succession of versions, which are ultimately not at all compatible from one enigma to another. The common points are the shovel, the figures, the title, the things.
8000 measurements if you look carefully, it's crazy, it's crazy, it's crazy, it's crazy, this enigma is really refined as much as possible.
(Q – aladore: I wonder if the shovel doesn’t have a somewhat universal character, you see, if like, it’s not like an arrow, a direction you see and then…)
(Q – nlc: we know that the pickaxe would have done less well, Max said that he preferred a shovel to a pickaxe, so there is still the symbolism of digging, which must be taken into account, but not that, because you can dig with a pickaxe, but with a pickaxe you don't remove the earth, a shovel does.
(Q – aladore: but it’s not now that you use the shovel, the shovel you…)
(Q – nlc: it is in the visual, so you have to use it, even if it is not physically used to dig, we are not there yet, it is necessarily used in this enigma, in connection with… )
MB : is it only the shovel that is keeping you busy at the moment?
(Q – Gringos: at the moment we are still very busy…)
(Q – aladore: and the vocabulary of the 650 changes a lot of terms that seem simple at first glance…)
(Q – Gringos: the title is also very obscure anyway…)
(Q – Syn: there is perhaps an element which does not appear in the last two puzzles, which does not appear at all and which is important in the owl. The owl must be taken into account, right?)
MB : I take him into account a lot, I speak to him almost daily, so yes I pay very close attention to the owl.
Well, I'll tell you something, in the puzzles there are moments where the owl is to be taken into account.
(Q – aladore: it’s the story of the central character, that is to say that if it turns out, we are the central character…)
(Q – nlc: yeah you actually have to imagine it in the context…)
MB : in some puzzles, not in all, but in some puzzles but yes.
(Q – aladore: I wonder if the shovel doesn’t have a somewhat universal character, you see, if like, it’s not like an arrow, a direction you see and then…)
(Q – nlc: we know that the pickaxe would have done less well, Max said that he preferred a shovel to a pickaxe, so there is still the symbolism of digging, which must be taken into account, but not that, because you can dig with a pickaxe, but with a pickaxe you don't remove the earth, a shovel does.
(Q – aladore: but it’s not now that you use the shovel, the shovel you…)
(Q – nlc: it is in the visual, so you have to use it, even if it is not physically used to dig, we are not there yet, it is necessarily used in this enigma, in connection with… )
MB : is it only the shovel that is keeping you busy at the moment?
(Q – Gringos: at the moment we are still very busy…)
(Q – aladore: and the vocabulary of the 650 changes a lot of terms that seem simple at first glance…)
(Q – Gringos: the title is also very obscure anyway…)
(Q – Syn: there is perhaps an element which does not appear in the last two puzzles, which does not appear at all and which is important in the owl. The owl must be taken into account, right?)
MB : I take him into account a lot, I speak to him almost daily, so yes I pay very close attention to the owl.
Well, I'll tell you something, in the puzzles there are moments where the owl is to be taken into account.
(Q – aladore: it’s the story of the central character, that is to say that if it turns out, we are the central character…)
(Q – nlc: yeah you actually have to imagine it in the context…)
MB : in some puzzles, not in all, but in some puzzles but yes.