>(Q - ??: among the multitude of reflections during the game until the final stage, could a researcher mix up brushes and confuse the remainders
with the elements of solution that he would have used during his journey?)
MB : it's impossible, there is no mixture to fear at this level. The remainders, you will understand them when you are at the end of the course, before there is no notion of remainders, for me the notion of remainders does not come into play until we have gone to the zone.< br />
(Q - ??: yes but we are talking about decryption remains, it is always the term used as decryption remainder, is that right? If we have understood Max's summary correctly, which were not useful in solving the puzzles....but as a remainder of solutions, could a researcher misunderstand himself and say, thinking that he has already used them)
MB : no, the remainders you will only be able to perceive them when you are practically at the end of the course and at that moment, you will say to yourself "ha well yes"", if I were still looking for a synonym for remainders, I could mention the overlapping term.
(Q - ??: a sort of synthesis?)
MB : ""overlap"", not synthesis, ""overlap"". When we do an investigation, the synthesis is what allows us to say the guy is guilty, but the cross-checking is what allows us to say that this clue holds up or not. We cross-check and say "ah yes", ok, so indeed in this enigma there is that too, indeed I saw it go by, I didn't use it on the Suddenly, but now it makes complete sense. There is this notion of a bit of overlap, you know what I mean?
That's why I tell you, don't get obsessed along the way, you have to wait for the right moment.
(Q - ??: that's what Max Valentin said)
MB : I had the opportunity to read a few madits where he talks about that and what he says about it is very accurate, it's completely in the same tone when he talks about leftovers, he doesn't say it all exactly like me but he says, there it is, it results from your solutions, you will see it when the time comes, it will be useful to you when the time comes, you must not fixate on the remainders, it is of absolutely no use in the resolution of the puzzles and the route to be taken.
(Q - ??: he said that they will impose themselves on you naturally and he advises not to worry about them)
MB : yes, yes, I completely agree on that.
(Q - ??: in fact that's why you talk about overlapping, because when we arrive at the zone that we will be able to understand them, so in fact it is the zone which allows of....)
MB : not only will you understand them but you will look for them, because we will say my zone is that, therefore what I need, and everything will come back to your mind and you will everything find of course, that's where the elements come to light.
MB : it's impossible, there is no mixture to fear at this level. The remainders, you will understand them when you are at the end of the course, before there is no notion of remainders, for me the notion of remainders does not come into play until we have gone to the zone.< br />
(Q - ??: yes but we are talking about decryption remains, it is always the term used as decryption remainder, is that right? If we have understood Max's summary correctly, which were not useful in solving the puzzles....but as a remainder of solutions, could a researcher misunderstand himself and say, thinking that he has already used them)
MB : no, the remainders you will only be able to perceive them when you are practically at the end of the course and at that moment, you will say to yourself "ha well yes"", if I were still looking for a synonym for remainders, I could mention the overlapping term.
(Q - ??: a sort of synthesis?)
MB : ""overlap"", not synthesis, ""overlap"". When we do an investigation, the synthesis is what allows us to say the guy is guilty, but the cross-checking is what allows us to say that this clue holds up or not. We cross-check and say "ah yes", ok, so indeed in this enigma there is that too, indeed I saw it go by, I didn't use it on the Suddenly, but now it makes complete sense. There is this notion of a bit of overlap, you know what I mean?
That's why I tell you, don't get obsessed along the way, you have to wait for the right moment.
(Q - ??: that's what Max Valentin said)
MB : I had the opportunity to read a few madits where he talks about that and what he says about it is very accurate, it's completely in the same tone when he talks about leftovers, he doesn't say it all exactly like me but he says, there it is, it results from your solutions, you will see it when the time comes, it will be useful to you when the time comes, you must not fixate on the remainders, it is of absolutely no use in the resolution of the puzzles and the route to be taken.
(Q - ??: he said that they will impose themselves on you naturally and he advises not to worry about them)
MB : yes, yes, I completely agree on that.
(Q - ??: in fact that's why you talk about overlapping, because when we arrive at the zone that we will be able to understand them, so in fact it is the zone which allows of....)
MB : not only will you understand them but you will look for them, because we will say my zone is that, therefore what I need, and everything will come back to your mind and you will everything find of course, that's where the elements come to light.