(Q - ??: a lot of owls have been looking for it for a long time, apparently we can't figure it out, I was asking myself a question: do you think...is-
that we have to understand something or we arrive at the point where we will have to guess something, I distinguish between understanding and guessing... Do you think we have to
guess this thing that will unlock us [inaudible]...people...hours and hours without understanding this thing, it's incredible..)
(Q - nlc: there is not only one thing I think to understand...)
(Q - ??: well I don't know, I'm just asking this question, do you have to guess at some point, because indeed it's too blurry and you can't see through something blurry, it's difficult. We can guess something...When we see blurry we can guess but we can't see, that's it...I don't know if you can answer?)< br />
MB : it's complicated to answer that because I refuse to go back to the puzzles and the solutions, I don't want to answer all that. But if we stay in the spirit of hunting, I think we are in a register, initially of understanding, in a second phase of application, that is to say, unlike Max Valentin, I call the map a tool, it's still practical for drawing lines, for looking at where the cities, places, locations are, I call it a tool, it's not complicated.< br /> So in this sense, firstly we understand, secondly we deduce and then thirdly we continue with the rest, it's true that... it's not yet a scoop, the eleven enigmas follow one another, hence the importance that they are in order and at a given moment, when we are actually going to attack the end of the story, we have to understand and have a little bit of cleverness or a lot of cleverness, that's there where he says that we still enter, whether Max wants it or not, in the great tradition of treasure hunts.
In a treasure hunt, I take steps so that if you are not initiated you will not find it.
(Q - Mupsai: isn't it a question of interpretation of the results that the results themselves are the problem in fact?)
MB : interpretation of the results?
(Q - nlc: are the deductions made enigma by enigma, and we move forward...)
MB : don't forget, when you question me, don't forget that this has been going on for almost 30 years, the story itself has a burden, a weight, an impact on our discussions. This means that there have been thousands of theories, players, thousands of decryptions, solutions proposed, and that has an impact on the ability that I may have to answer you or not.
(Q - nlc: there is not only one thing I think to understand...)
(Q - ??: well I don't know, I'm just asking this question, do you have to guess at some point, because indeed it's too blurry and you can't see through something blurry, it's difficult. We can guess something...When we see blurry we can guess but we can't see, that's it...I don't know if you can answer?)< br />
MB : it's complicated to answer that because I refuse to go back to the puzzles and the solutions, I don't want to answer all that. But if we stay in the spirit of hunting, I think we are in a register, initially of understanding, in a second phase of application, that is to say, unlike Max Valentin, I call the map a tool, it's still practical for drawing lines, for looking at where the cities, places, locations are, I call it a tool, it's not complicated.< br /> So in this sense, firstly we understand, secondly we deduce and then thirdly we continue with the rest, it's true that... it's not yet a scoop, the eleven enigmas follow one another, hence the importance that they are in order and at a given moment, when we are actually going to attack the end of the story, we have to understand and have a little bit of cleverness or a lot of cleverness, that's there where he says that we still enter, whether Max wants it or not, in the great tradition of treasure hunts.
In a treasure hunt, I take steps so that if you are not initiated you will not find it.
(Q - Mupsai: isn't it a question of interpretation of the results that the results themselves are the problem in fact?)
MB : interpretation of the results?
(Q - nlc: are the deductions made enigma by enigma, and we move forward...)
MB : don't forget, when you question me, don't forget that this has been going on for almost 30 years, the story itself has a burden, a weight, an impact on our discussions. This means that there have been thousands of theories, players, thousands of decryptions, solutions proposed, and that has an impact on the ability that I may have to answer you or not.