(Q - Nabil: I really enjoyed your story in the last book, it kept me in suspense and it was really not bad. I have a question about the editions of the books
, I was wondering if by chance, there wasn't perhaps a wink that would be present in the old editions but not in the latest?)
MB : uh, so a wink, there were editions where there were all the additional indications, a certain number of things that I didn't want to include, so if in all that, there was a wink made by Max Valentin I don't know, I can't answer that, I don't know. I have cleaned up to the extent that I believe that there is already enough complexity surrounding this hunt, so there are texts that I am not submitting because I know that they are useless, and others because I think that they are possibly likely to mislead players, I am thinking of certain curses or certain additional indications that I have not included because they do not seem to me to add anything to the game .
(Q - Nabil: ha okay, because I believe that in a vocal, you are referring to a very specific wink which could alert someone who would have the beginnings of a super solution or the super solution, I don't know, maybe I'm wrong?)
MB : a wink from me then?
(Q - Nabil: not from you, which would be in all editions, you talk about it in one of the vocals, a wink which would be in all editions, in the book, that gives you said nothing?)
MB : it doesn't come to mind at the moment, I don't see... so something that Max Valentin would have written and which would be a wink? No, the only wink in fact that I mentioned, that's perhaps what we're talking about, it's the famous article 5 of the regulations, the person who has solved the last riddle will be deemed the winner, ... he found it very clever to slip that into the article of the regulations, so by implication, it meant that at the same time it was necessary to solve the last enigma, in other articles of the regulations, it was very clear that it was necessary to dig up the countermark, that's why I say today that we must do both and the fact of having slipped that into article 5 of the regulations, allowed anyone who wanted to read it to understand that there was, indeed, one last enigma which made it possible to discover the exact location of the cache.
I answered earlier that this last riddle, it was in the 11th that we had finished, he used that afterwards to use the term or to start again, I know if it was him who used it in the 1st, but in any case to validate the term 12th enigma.
Which, there becomes something totally false, the regulations say that there are 11 enigmas, it does not say that there are 12 on the one hand, and on the other hand, there are no not 12, so here's the thing, there are actually 11, there are not 12.
But I don't see any other slightly subliminal element that he would have slipped into the writings, at this moment I don't see any.
MB : uh, so a wink, there were editions where there were all the additional indications, a certain number of things that I didn't want to include, so if in all that, there was a wink made by Max Valentin I don't know, I can't answer that, I don't know. I have cleaned up to the extent that I believe that there is already enough complexity surrounding this hunt, so there are texts that I am not submitting because I know that they are useless, and others because I think that they are possibly likely to mislead players, I am thinking of certain curses or certain additional indications that I have not included because they do not seem to me to add anything to the game .
(Q - Nabil: ha okay, because I believe that in a vocal, you are referring to a very specific wink which could alert someone who would have the beginnings of a super solution or the super solution, I don't know, maybe I'm wrong?)
MB : a wink from me then?
(Q - Nabil: not from you, which would be in all editions, you talk about it in one of the vocals, a wink which would be in all editions, in the book, that gives you said nothing?)
MB : it doesn't come to mind at the moment, I don't see... so something that Max Valentin would have written and which would be a wink? No, the only wink in fact that I mentioned, that's perhaps what we're talking about, it's the famous article 5 of the regulations, the person who has solved the last riddle will be deemed the winner, ... he found it very clever to slip that into the article of the regulations, so by implication, it meant that at the same time it was necessary to solve the last enigma, in other articles of the regulations, it was very clear that it was necessary to dig up the countermark, that's why I say today that we must do both and the fact of having slipped that into article 5 of the regulations, allowed anyone who wanted to read it to understand that there was, indeed, one last enigma which made it possible to discover the exact location of the cache.
I answered earlier that this last riddle, it was in the 11th that we had finished, he used that afterwards to use the term or to start again, I know if it was him who used it in the 1st, but in any case to validate the term 12th enigma.
Which, there becomes something totally false, the regulations say that there are 11 enigmas, it does not say that there are 12 on the one hand, and on the other hand, there are no not 12, so here's the thing, there are actually 11, there are not 12.
But I don't see any other slightly subliminal element that he would have slipped into the writings, at this moment I don't see any.