(Q - ??: in relation to what you said, self-confidence, we often have too much,... we try to doubt, from the moment we trace
3 lines that meet on a map of France, we can say, that's it, I have the area, and so at the same time I think that too much self-confidence doesn't help, so my question is quite simple,
it is, from what I understood from what you have said about it in the past, in the logic of the game, if I am there, I know it, I have something, they tell me well done young padawan
, you win, go ahead, go get it So I think that's important, precisely because otherwise, then if you say trust in me, frankly I have 3 or 4 zones, frankly I'll get through the week.
on the roads of France and I thank you if I understood correctly.)
MB : so if you have 3 or 4 zones, you should not have confidence in yourself. You have to be very, very careful. It's very interesting, why I talk about self-confidence, because for years the madits have sowed doubt, I oppose the doubt instilled by the madits, to self-confidence, when I say self-confidence, it is confidence in one's reasoning, confidence in one's reasoning, there are plenty of ways to illustrate it.
I created mechanisms, models in the field of design, there are engineers who create lots of systems,... confidence in one's reasoning, that means that one imposes oneself on oneself -even a rigor in our reasoning, we leave nothing to chance, we think about everything, and at a given moment we say to ourselves I've done the job, I'll move on to the next part, we have confidence in the work that one carried out, in one's own reasoning.
Now, marvel at yourself, surprise yourself, marvel at the discoveries you make, because ""well yes, that's definitely it, there is that, God knows that there I saw thousands pass by, there it becomes dangerous, that is to say that we must rely on reasoning, we must not rely, in any case in the unfolding of the riddles, we must not rely on coincidences, things which seem so phoned in that it cannot be anything else, we must remain concentrated, not on external elements which can provoke these coincidences or encourage us to say it is necessarily there, because there is such an engraving, such a thing, such a sign, such a weather vane, such I don't know what, we find something, such a rock or whatever you want, and there we are in the coincidence, we are in the find.
Before reaching the stage where we are really going to put our imagination to work, we must start with rigor, and so when I say self-confidence, it means confidence in well-supported reasoning, carried out very properly from A to Z without complacency, without saying that he said that but ultimately, I take it a little differently...we can't take it any other way, we have to...if there is such a possibility, for example, that presents itself, if there is something, you say to yourself, I understand like that, before being sure that you have understood it well, you have to put everything back into abyss and say, well, is it that I really understood well, is that really it, we must try to verify, it is this rigor which can allow us to form real certainty.
And I see a lot of messages coming through where people write to me, I'm sure, that's it, I'll meet you, you come, we'll both dig, great, there you go,... but it's not how it works.
The reasoning that will take place in the head of the person who will find and, how would I say, the outcome of this reasoning, will not be to say come on, let's go, let's dig, I'm sure I found ...it will happen on a completely different level where the person who finds it will say to themselves, yes there is really something there, it can no longer be a thing.
It's completely different from the excitement of a find, it's still the culmination of...really...so it takes imagination but there is still a logic to put in place , there are lots of things to put in place, which means that we cannot be... how am I going to say this, the youthful excitement that we can have on a discovery is felt in a In a way, the excitement we get when we reach the end of these puzzles will be closer to what investigators can feel when they reach the end of an investigation. So they're not just going to sing in public, they're going to say that's it, we have the evidence, ultimately they're rereading everything, they're rechecking everything.
It's a much more..., how shall I put it, a little less spontaneous process in the end, because the discovery will involve checking everything carefully, making sure that we have everything right and then we'll say to ourselves yeah that's it, that's probably it and then all that remains is for the final justice of the peace to say well, I'm going to make my little hole and then I find the countermark.
MB : so if you have 3 or 4 zones, you should not have confidence in yourself. You have to be very, very careful. It's very interesting, why I talk about self-confidence, because for years the madits have sowed doubt, I oppose the doubt instilled by the madits, to self-confidence, when I say self-confidence, it is confidence in one's reasoning, confidence in one's reasoning, there are plenty of ways to illustrate it.
I created mechanisms, models in the field of design, there are engineers who create lots of systems,... confidence in one's reasoning, that means that one imposes oneself on oneself -even a rigor in our reasoning, we leave nothing to chance, we think about everything, and at a given moment we say to ourselves I've done the job, I'll move on to the next part, we have confidence in the work that one carried out, in one's own reasoning.
Now, marvel at yourself, surprise yourself, marvel at the discoveries you make, because ""well yes, that's definitely it, there is that, God knows that there I saw thousands pass by, there it becomes dangerous, that is to say that we must rely on reasoning, we must not rely, in any case in the unfolding of the riddles, we must not rely on coincidences, things which seem so phoned in that it cannot be anything else, we must remain concentrated, not on external elements which can provoke these coincidences or encourage us to say it is necessarily there, because there is such an engraving, such a thing, such a sign, such a weather vane, such I don't know what, we find something, such a rock or whatever you want, and there we are in the coincidence, we are in the find.
Before reaching the stage where we are really going to put our imagination to work, we must start with rigor, and so when I say self-confidence, it means confidence in well-supported reasoning, carried out very properly from A to Z without complacency, without saying that he said that but ultimately, I take it a little differently...we can't take it any other way, we have to...if there is such a possibility, for example, that presents itself, if there is something, you say to yourself, I understand like that, before being sure that you have understood it well, you have to put everything back into abyss and say, well, is it that I really understood well, is that really it, we must try to verify, it is this rigor which can allow us to form real certainty.
And I see a lot of messages coming through where people write to me, I'm sure, that's it, I'll meet you, you come, we'll both dig, great, there you go,... but it's not how it works.
The reasoning that will take place in the head of the person who will find and, how would I say, the outcome of this reasoning, will not be to say come on, let's go, let's dig, I'm sure I found ...it will happen on a completely different level where the person who finds it will say to themselves, yes there is really something there, it can no longer be a thing.
It's completely different from the excitement of a find, it's still the culmination of...really...so it takes imagination but there is still a logic to put in place , there are lots of things to put in place, which means that we cannot be... how am I going to say this, the youthful excitement that we can have on a discovery is felt in a In a way, the excitement we get when we reach the end of these puzzles will be closer to what investigators can feel when they reach the end of an investigation. So they're not just going to sing in public, they're going to say that's it, we have the evidence, ultimately they're rereading everything, they're rechecking everything.
It's a much more..., how shall I put it, a little less spontaneous process in the end, because the discovery will involve checking everything carefully, making sure that we have everything right and then we'll say to ourselves yeah that's it, that's probably it and then all that remains is for the final justice of the peace to say well, I'm going to make my little hole and then I find the countermark.