Moteur de recherche & Synthèse des "Midits" sur le jeu "Sur la trace de la Chouette d'Or ®"

<< Back

13/08/2022 - Enregistrement n° 38 - 02:22:15 :15: Documentary sources (sound problem for the question)

(Q - SABOU: I wanted to come back to documentary research, to the question that was asked earlier, there is one thing that caught my attention, that Michel says that a dictionary enough, I took out my Larousse and my Robert, but I can't see a 15-year-old researcher who starts the hunt knowing almost everything that is necessary, Newton, Mendeleiev's table, color theory, Anglo notation -Saxon, the revolutions of the planets, I know if you can clarify?)

MB : clarify it in what sense?

(Q - SABOU: when you say that a simple dictionary is sufficient, it seems a little light compared to the documentation we have to obtain?)

MB : .well I don't have the impression that a dictionary is light, there are a lot of things in a dictionary, between Larouse and Robert, there you were talking about colors, right?

(Q - SABOU: no, a little bit of all the subjects, I have the impression that there is a lot of research to do, subjects to address, to dig into, to document on) < /i>

MB : Not beyond what we find in a dictionary and not beyond what the appetite for knowledge of a 15 year old child can allow us to grasp, to understand. I'm not saying that every 15-year-old could do it, but hey, there's no need to be a genius. At 15 we already have things in our heads so I'll take the example of Max Valentin from the time, that doesn't mean that a 15 year old kid is the perfect archetype of the discoverer of the Golden Owl but since we are adults there are not many 15 year olds on the discord I think, so for all of you the content of a dictionary is sufficient.