MB : I have one thing to tell you.
I read on the discord that doubts remain about me, as to my understanding of the puzzles, as to my having the right solutions, as to my understanding of the traits, as to my understanding of the psychology of the chaouetters who have devoted years and years to
hunting, the hesitations that I may show in my responses, the inappropriate terms, according to some, that I use.
I am absolutely aware of all that and I realize that in reality my real problem is not at all understanding the game, understanding the solutions, understanding the puzzles, understanding the work that the owls have done since so long.
My real problem is that I always think, in my way of responding, about the impact that my words will have on the people who listen to me, because I know that they are in a situation...how am I going to say that, a little unbalanced, they are a little handicapped compared to me, because they don't know everything I know, that's obvious
And for the most part they are so in an understanding, in an appreciation of things, in a very advanced reasoning on certain points that I say to myself how can I express myself so that my point is heard, without destroying what should not be be, because among most players there are, in the theories that are exposed, such as I can read them or hear them when we talk about them, there are very good things, there are crazy things , there's a little bit of everything.
And the real problem for me is not understanding the riddles or knowing what to answer, the real problem for me is understanding what the impact of my answers is, and I wouldn't want the impact of my answers either negative beyond measure, negative from time to time when it demolishes certain theories which can be demolished so much the better, but negative in a general way I wouldn't want that.
So it's really a question of vocabulary between the owls and me, and I try to think about the impact that my words will have, the way in which the words I use will be understood, to try to balance them, to try to say things which do not annihilate things which should not be but which allow us to put into perspective theories which are, to say the least, sometimes... vague.
I am absolutely aware of all that and I realize that in reality my real problem is not at all understanding the game, understanding the solutions, understanding the puzzles, understanding the work that the owls have done since so long.
My real problem is that I always think, in my way of responding, about the impact that my words will have on the people who listen to me, because I know that they are in a situation...how am I going to say that, a little unbalanced, they are a little handicapped compared to me, because they don't know everything I know, that's obvious
And for the most part they are so in an understanding, in an appreciation of things, in a very advanced reasoning on certain points that I say to myself how can I express myself so that my point is heard, without destroying what should not be be, because among most players there are, in the theories that are exposed, such as I can read them or hear them when we talk about them, there are very good things, there are crazy things , there's a little bit of everything.
And the real problem for me is not understanding the riddles or knowing what to answer, the real problem for me is understanding what the impact of my answers is, and I wouldn't want the impact of my answers either negative beyond measure, negative from time to time when it demolishes certain theories which can be demolished so much the better, but negative in a general way I wouldn't want that.
So it's really a question of vocabulary between the owls and me, and I try to think about the impact that my words will have, the way in which the words I use will be understood, to try to balance them, to try to say things which do not annihilate things which should not be but which allow us to put into perspective theories which are, to say the least, sometimes... vague.