(Q - ??: regarding the false leads, you said that they were largely induced by the ideas, the questions that had come up with the researchers. when you saw the solutions you didn't
didn't see false leads and I thought about Orval's solutions, he only talked about his false leads at the end. Don't you think it would be possible, since you haven't done it again?
-even the solutions, do you think it would be possible that he wrote, planned false leads and that you did not see them?)
MB : I understand the false leads are largely induced by vocabulary. Once again it was his first hunt and he had designed it with the story of Father Mehus, it was in a much more romanticized context (no Becker and his visuals), there was the story as it was. he had designed it himself, and therefore it was romanticized, enveloped, it was literary. Then he removed the story of Father Mehus since it was more compatible, but the riddles remained as they were, with a few small changes that we all know now, they remained in the literary spirit as in their initial conception and so in the words he uses, there are things that allow us to go towards "submarines or transatlantic liners....", all of that is a question of vocabulary and from there, lots of false leads can come out.
But I haven't seen any real construction, there are perhaps things that actually still escape me, because I haven't fully delved into the decryptions, I know them, I've read the solutions but when we are in it, there is perhaps on certain things an intention to propose an alternative with a false lead on one side and the right lead on the other, this can be found, retraced, if I dare say, but for me there was no real initial desire to construct so many false leads.
MB : I understand the false leads are largely induced by vocabulary. Once again it was his first hunt and he had designed it with the story of Father Mehus, it was in a much more romanticized context (no Becker and his visuals), there was the story as it was. he had designed it himself, and therefore it was romanticized, enveloped, it was literary. Then he removed the story of Father Mehus since it was more compatible, but the riddles remained as they were, with a few small changes that we all know now, they remained in the literary spirit as in their initial conception and so in the words he uses, there are things that allow us to go towards "submarines or transatlantic liners....", all of that is a question of vocabulary and from there, lots of false leads can come out.
But I haven't seen any real construction, there are perhaps things that actually still escape me, because I haven't fully delved into the decryptions, I know them, I've read the solutions but when we are in it, there is perhaps on certain things an intention to propose an alternative with a false lead on one side and the right lead on the other, this can be found, retraced, if I dare say, but for me there was no real initial desire to construct so many false leads.