(Q - ??: I would say answer 2 [see previous voice MB : they don't know what they should be looking for] when we have nothing, we prefer to cling to the branches, to something even
if it is false)
MB : here, out of honesty, if I take up Antinos' question from earlier, out of honesty, can I answer yes the owl can be found in relation to what you have just told me, is it what in conscience I am sure that you or someone else can really find the solution with what information is available today or do I have to bring something else, This is a real problem.
And it's not a joke, I definitely don't want to say impulsively like that, come on, I'm going to give up a lot of things, that would be stupid, there's too much at stake morally speaking, psychologically speaking, the stakes are important to you in relation to the involvement of thousands of people, I don't want to make fun of several thousand people by saying to you hey I'll give you something, deal with it, I don't want to do that.
So what do I do, I try to understand if in everything you tell me there is reason to say yes they are not far away, they are able to find.
(Q - ??: you cannot be responsible for players' addiction to this game)
MB : I'm not talking about the players' addiction to this game, I'm talking about knowing whether they have the necessary and sufficient elements at hand to complete it.
(Q - ??: the 650 is not that complicated to solve with the elements you gave?)
MB : [laughs] ah if you say so it’s great. You summarize the question perfectly, you ask it differently from me but that's exactly the question. You say yes, that's all I'm asking, I don't want to rush, you have time ahead of you, I'm not going to rush.
If you think that indeed the 650 has everything you need and that you are going to get through it, or that you have got through with it, no problem I would be delighted but the question I ask myself is, Is there everything you need in the 650 and others to get to the end of the thing? It’s honest what I tell you, there’s nothing mysterious about it.
I say to myself is it findable as is, is there the material or will we have to wait another 20, 30, 40 or 50 years, I won't be there anymore , so that one day, someone, a 3rd generation Asperger's, ends up saying, well I have this idea and all of a sudden this is what we had to do.
But that's not the goal of the game, it would still be necessary that through sagacity, certainly more or less exacerbated, even exceptional, at least one of the players be able to find and if I am, at a given moment confronted with a certainty that it's not possible because the information given is not sufficient, yes there I will intervene.
This is the real debate that there is around this to highlight, it will perhaps allow you for those who have doubts to admit that when we talk about the Super Solution, we are not talking at all about the same thing as the puzzles, it's another intellectual approach, the pirates are back.
MB : here, out of honesty, if I take up Antinos' question from earlier, out of honesty, can I answer yes the owl can be found in relation to what you have just told me, is it what in conscience I am sure that you or someone else can really find the solution with what information is available today or do I have to bring something else, This is a real problem.
And it's not a joke, I definitely don't want to say impulsively like that, come on, I'm going to give up a lot of things, that would be stupid, there's too much at stake morally speaking, psychologically speaking, the stakes are important to you in relation to the involvement of thousands of people, I don't want to make fun of several thousand people by saying to you hey I'll give you something, deal with it, I don't want to do that.
So what do I do, I try to understand if in everything you tell me there is reason to say yes they are not far away, they are able to find.
(Q - ??: you cannot be responsible for players' addiction to this game)
MB : I'm not talking about the players' addiction to this game, I'm talking about knowing whether they have the necessary and sufficient elements at hand to complete it.
(Q - ??: the 650 is not that complicated to solve with the elements you gave?)
MB : [laughs] ah if you say so it’s great. You summarize the question perfectly, you ask it differently from me but that's exactly the question. You say yes, that's all I'm asking, I don't want to rush, you have time ahead of you, I'm not going to rush.
If you think that indeed the 650 has everything you need and that you are going to get through it, or that you have got through with it, no problem I would be delighted but the question I ask myself is, Is there everything you need in the 650 and others to get to the end of the thing? It’s honest what I tell you, there’s nothing mysterious about it.
I say to myself is it findable as is, is there the material or will we have to wait another 20, 30, 40 or 50 years, I won't be there anymore , so that one day, someone, a 3rd generation Asperger's, ends up saying, well I have this idea and all of a sudden this is what we had to do.
But that's not the goal of the game, it would still be necessary that through sagacity, certainly more or less exacerbated, even exceptional, at least one of the players be able to find and if I am, at a given moment confronted with a certainty that it's not possible because the information given is not sufficient, yes there I will intervene.
This is the real debate that there is around this to highlight, it will perhaps allow you for those who have doubts to admit that when we talk about the Super Solution, we are not talking at all about the same thing as the puzzles, it's another intellectual approach, the pirates are back.