MB : Another thing that you must understand, I told it in the secret notebooks, it's not for nothing that I did it, it's because it really was, it was the character
.
I talked about camelot, camelot means that at the time I knew him he was a marketing consultant, specializing in mail order sales.
We give him a contact through a relationship, he is put in contact with this industrialist from Besançon who manufactures gold watches, who works for Cartier, for practically all the major watch brands in the world, who machines blocks of gold on his
machine tools, well it's something a bit prestigious, he had his brand new Mercedes 600 in front of the door, Régis Hauser arrives, I parked my Rolls next to it, he's there, he enters the factory he
has eyes like saucers, he says to himself there is a great deal to be done.
So he arrived at a sponsor with his project which was not ours, he sold us his treasure hunting project, he was fully into the business, not there to create poetry or literature at this point. moment. I can tell you that from the moment he put it on our desk, that is to say 2 or 3 weeks later, he first talked about it and later came back with his thing, when he put it on the desk, he had just printed it, he had revised everything, everything was clean, there were no mistakes, he had revised his copy well, I can tell you that.
So we must not forget that, so when someone tells me there may be a fault, he may not have done it on purpose, let me laugh, of course no there was no fault. He had tested his thing, he wanted to sell it at all costs, he had revised his copy carefully, I'll tell you again, he had made the quotes, he had done the whole file, not just the treasure hunt, that's it. was very elaborate, he had already thought about it well. afterwards he was a little, he didn't really appreciate the story of the owl first because he didn't like the idea, then he thought it was a big thing when I wanted to make the bronze but that it's later.
He thought it was too big to bury, well, it wasn't the subject that excited him the most, although afterwards he said very, very well the owl, it wasn't that at all, he found that it was a negative symbol that the peasants nailed on the barn doors,...not very useful in France whereas elsewhere it was a symbol of wisdom, as a marketing advisor he was not very keen on cool but he was forced to adapt to it, that's why I'm telling you that in these versions, there are modifications that have changed but the mechanism... I am convinced that the cache does not did not change and therefore the mechanism worked in all cases.
Which does not mean that looking at a 1st version to try to make it work is easier than looking at the 2nd if necessary, doing small cross-checks could perhaps be useful to certain j I don't have the slightest idea, but there's no point looking for a fault, there's no point in imagining that he made a mistake, that he didn't see the L or I don't know what.. .it's not worth imagining that, it's not even possible.
(Q - ?? there is still a small fault the archer on the strings of a violin, archer ""er"", a small fault all the same?)< /u>
MB : [laughs] but he was not exempt from typos or typos
So he arrived at a sponsor with his project which was not ours, he sold us his treasure hunting project, he was fully into the business, not there to create poetry or literature at this point. moment. I can tell you that from the moment he put it on our desk, that is to say 2 or 3 weeks later, he first talked about it and later came back with his thing, when he put it on the desk, he had just printed it, he had revised everything, everything was clean, there were no mistakes, he had revised his copy well, I can tell you that.
So we must not forget that, so when someone tells me there may be a fault, he may not have done it on purpose, let me laugh, of course no there was no fault. He had tested his thing, he wanted to sell it at all costs, he had revised his copy carefully, I'll tell you again, he had made the quotes, he had done the whole file, not just the treasure hunt, that's it. was very elaborate, he had already thought about it well. afterwards he was a little, he didn't really appreciate the story of the owl first because he didn't like the idea, then he thought it was a big thing when I wanted to make the bronze but that it's later.
He thought it was too big to bury, well, it wasn't the subject that excited him the most, although afterwards he said very, very well the owl, it wasn't that at all, he found that it was a negative symbol that the peasants nailed on the barn doors,...not very useful in France whereas elsewhere it was a symbol of wisdom, as a marketing advisor he was not very keen on cool but he was forced to adapt to it, that's why I'm telling you that in these versions, there are modifications that have changed but the mechanism... I am convinced that the cache does not did not change and therefore the mechanism worked in all cases.
Which does not mean that looking at a 1st version to try to make it work is easier than looking at the 2nd if necessary, doing small cross-checks could perhaps be useful to certain j I don't have the slightest idea, but there's no point looking for a fault, there's no point in imagining that he made a mistake, that he didn't see the L or I don't know what.. .it's not worth imagining that, it's not even possible.
(Q - ?? there is still a small fault the archer on the strings of a violin, archer ""er"", a small fault all the same?)< /u>
MB : [laughs] but he was not exempt from typos or typos