(Q - Belloq: would you have released the Specifications if you had already been aware of the solutions?)
MB : I understood what you meant, in short it means that knowing the solutions, I consider that the specifications are a help and make things easier, is that what that means?< br />
(Q - Belloq: help or maybe the opposite?)
MB : okay that's what I said, it's a dirty question...would I...yes I would
(Q - Belloq: to go a little further as there are certain enigmas with some variations in the statements, notably in the 1st version, can we really use this 1st version without be disturbed, in the same way as the final version in fact?)
MB : so I didn't do it to encourage you to use the 1st version, in my mind, in all sincerity, well it's true that I didn't know the solutions at the time, to tell the truth I can't swear I wouldn't. In fact I would have had the solutions before we will never know if I would have published the specifications or not, even I cannot know in fact. I think so but ultimately I can't know. That said, my approach was more to say, try to understand that in everything that has been, in everything that exists as written around hunting, we are not dealing with a bible, that was my idea of ??saying wait, there have been variations, adaptations, things like that, to say that we must remain attentive, everything is not of the first importance, to the fact that there are things which can be of the dressing, others which are perhaps more important and my idea was to give a little bit of this kind of information, to bring an open mind, a new perspective on the puzzles, it That’s what I really wanted.
(Q - Belloq: I'm going to come back to asking you if the variants work as well from the 1st version to the last in fact? That's a bit like the complexity, given that there are differences, we are tempted to ask questions so it can either facilitate or confuse you see what I'm saying? I'm afraid that it could confuse more than anything else and so if we are reassured by saying that everything. works in the same way, no worries, in that sense it works...if on the other hand there are small typos that can be disruptive, that's what worries me)< br />
MB : for me there is no typo. I remember the discussions with Max Valentin. I remember times when we discussed lots of things, I mean he wasn't a guy to leave a mistake in there.
MB : I understood what you meant, in short it means that knowing the solutions, I consider that the specifications are a help and make things easier, is that what that means?< br />
(Q - Belloq: help or maybe the opposite?)
MB : okay that's what I said, it's a dirty question...would I...yes I would
(Q - Belloq: to go a little further as there are certain enigmas with some variations in the statements, notably in the 1st version, can we really use this 1st version without be disturbed, in the same way as the final version in fact?)
MB : so I didn't do it to encourage you to use the 1st version, in my mind, in all sincerity, well it's true that I didn't know the solutions at the time, to tell the truth I can't swear I wouldn't. In fact I would have had the solutions before we will never know if I would have published the specifications or not, even I cannot know in fact. I think so but ultimately I can't know. That said, my approach was more to say, try to understand that in everything that has been, in everything that exists as written around hunting, we are not dealing with a bible, that was my idea of ??saying wait, there have been variations, adaptations, things like that, to say that we must remain attentive, everything is not of the first importance, to the fact that there are things which can be of the dressing, others which are perhaps more important and my idea was to give a little bit of this kind of information, to bring an open mind, a new perspective on the puzzles, it That’s what I really wanted.
(Q - Belloq: I'm going to come back to asking you if the variants work as well from the 1st version to the last in fact? That's a bit like the complexity, given that there are differences, we are tempted to ask questions so it can either facilitate or confuse you see what I'm saying? I'm afraid that it could confuse more than anything else and so if we are reassured by saying that everything. works in the same way, no worries, in that sense it works...if on the other hand there are small typos that can be disruptive, that's what worries me)< br />
MB : for me there is no typo. I remember the discussions with Max Valentin. I remember times when we discussed lots of things, I mean he wasn't a guy to leave a mistake in there.