(Q - ??: lines written on cards cannot be part of the puzzles, a department boundary...anything that is not really on the ground in fact)
MB : it's complicated to understand how you experience things, because I can't see it, it's impossible if I don't talk with you, I'm starting to understand how you see things.
(Q - ??: in fact if you have not spent hundreds or even thousands of hours on a map you cannot understand but we have that as a benchmark, the map is ...besides there are madits where Max Valentin says that you have to attack a hunt with a map and so we all have our map as support)
(Q - Gringos: what can help us is to provide rules like the gold of Sipan, there is a small rule of the game and see can the card be a tool, yes or no?)< /i>
MB : I said it, I answered very clearly, you need a card, it’s a tool.
(Q - ??: yes but not in the sense that Max Valentin says it's not a tool, because there are inscriptions on it...)
MB : I was honest with you, I am not able to assess if there are really things that could get stuck due to not having the 989 from 1993, but in any case I say you need a card, for me it seems absolutely obvious)
(Q - ??: you say that for the 470 the title has no geographical essence, so the title we do not need the map on the other hand Max Valentin says that, at the end of the 470, the fact of seeing the light through the opening is a geographical alignment For him all alignment is geographical)
.
MB : hence the interest of having a map, it is easier to appreciate an alignment
(Q - ??: what I understand is that you must then check this alignment on the map but it is not on the map that you will find it)
MB : it is not the map which will give the solution, but the map, it validates, it allows us to have a view, a vision of what we have imagined, a concrete, traced vision and we look at what it looks similar.
(Q - ??: if in 470 we are given 2 points, we are told to draw a line, we are free to extend it, we don't really know what we will find there but if later in another enigma we are given a third point which is on this line, well this line is validated and the map we don't care because the 3 points are given to us clearly by the enigmas)
(Q - ??: yes but nothing says that this third point is light and I am told that in 470 I must find the light but that does not give me the output of 470 what the light is.)
MB : it's complicated to understand how you experience things, because I can't see it, it's impossible if I don't talk with you, I'm starting to understand how you see things.
(Q - ??: in fact if you have not spent hundreds or even thousands of hours on a map you cannot understand but we have that as a benchmark, the map is ...besides there are madits where Max Valentin says that you have to attack a hunt with a map and so we all have our map as support)
(Q - Gringos: what can help us is to provide rules like the gold of Sipan, there is a small rule of the game and see can the card be a tool, yes or no?)< /i>
MB : I said it, I answered very clearly, you need a card, it’s a tool.
(Q - ??: yes but not in the sense that Max Valentin says it's not a tool, because there are inscriptions on it...)
MB : I was honest with you, I am not able to assess if there are really things that could get stuck due to not having the 989 from 1993, but in any case I say you need a card, for me it seems absolutely obvious)
(Q - ??: you say that for the 470 the title has no geographical essence, so the title we do not need the map on the other hand Max Valentin says that, at the end of the 470, the fact of seeing the light through the opening is a geographical alignment For him all alignment is geographical)
.
MB : hence the interest of having a map, it is easier to appreciate an alignment
(Q - ??: what I understand is that you must then check this alignment on the map but it is not on the map that you will find it)
MB : it is not the map which will give the solution, but the map, it validates, it allows us to have a view, a vision of what we have imagined, a concrete, traced vision and we look at what it looks similar.
(Q - ??: if in 470 we are given 2 points, we are told to draw a line, we are free to extend it, we don't really know what we will find there but if later in another enigma we are given a third point which is on this line, well this line is validated and the map we don't care because the 3 points are given to us clearly by the enigmas)
(Q - ??: yes but nothing says that this third point is light and I am told that in 470 I must find the light but that does not give me the output of 470 what the light is.)