(Q - Edmond Dantès: we're going to talk a little about changing the gear, so in the 650, my question, I'm going to try to keep it simple. how can I say it without saying too many things...the sentry m
spoke, and for her to speak to me I used a method, am I already in the gear change and is the 2nd part, that is to say the 520, using
a derivative of this method?)
MB : so on the 520 I can't answer because there aren't that many possible answers to that, it's an idea that belongs to you, on the other hand, from the moment we approach the reflection concerning the Sentinels, we are entering the moment of changing gear absolutely.
(Q - Edmond Dantès: so is the gear change split into 2 parts?)
MB : no [comment: immediate and clear]. no, no, when we approach the subject of the Sentinels, we change...we change the way we operate, we are in another chapter.
(Q - Edmond Dantès: yes, that's what allowed me, well in any case if I'm obviously right, because I can say anything, to have a word , to have....)
MB : you can't say anything, so on that point, it's good that you bring that up because I don't agree with that. I see a lot of theories, solutions, etc., which are proposed to me and they are never just anything. Apart from a few more or less unpredictable weirdos, I would say that the solutions I receive are practically never, never, never, anything.
You shouldn't say that, there is a logic, there is a construction, very, very well thought out things, simply, there is, I would say, an error on...so I am using a word that should not be overinterpret, I was going to say there is an error on the benchmarks, I'm not talking about the benchmarks, this, something, on the ground, I'm talking broadly about hunting, there are a certain number of directions to take , direction to take, things to trace, to find,... there are some, there are a certain number of players who do not have the same vision of things but overall, the reasoning is extremely constructed and very well done.
It's not just anything.
(Q - edmond Dantès: I agree, I don't think I said that the reasoning was nonsense, on the contrary these reasonings led me to the sentinels, we will say and therefore I did things that allowed me to obtain this word,...well, it's complicated to go further...)
MB : how did you tell me, the Sentinels spoke to you, right?
(Q - Edmond Dantès: absolutely, the numbers clearly indicated to me things which indicated to me things which allowed me to discover a word, come on, let's be clear, that's it. .)
MB : okay, so what is the question? Should I say bravo, that's good, are you right or what?
(Q - Edmond Dantès: my question is I am at the Sentinelles, I untied the threads, these threads allowed me to obtain a word, let's say, it's quite precise same and my question is, am I already in the change of gear and do I continue in this direction or is it a derivative of what I have just done which will give me allow you to find the Super Solution, to understand the last one...)
MB : no, no there is no derivative, when we are in the change of gear we are in another... we change register of way of thinking, of considering the thing but once we are inside, we are inside, there is no need to take up other arrangements or anything. No, no, we're going back..
You are in a very homogeneous stage, you enter into a logic, into a way of considering the thing which is different from what you did in the previous puzzles, but which constitute a whole, once you are in it you stay there and you go to the end.
MB : so on the 520 I can't answer because there aren't that many possible answers to that, it's an idea that belongs to you, on the other hand, from the moment we approach the reflection concerning the Sentinels, we are entering the moment of changing gear absolutely.
(Q - Edmond Dantès: so is the gear change split into 2 parts?)
MB : no [comment: immediate and clear]. no, no, when we approach the subject of the Sentinels, we change...we change the way we operate, we are in another chapter.
(Q - Edmond Dantès: yes, that's what allowed me, well in any case if I'm obviously right, because I can say anything, to have a word , to have....)
MB : you can't say anything, so on that point, it's good that you bring that up because I don't agree with that. I see a lot of theories, solutions, etc., which are proposed to me and they are never just anything. Apart from a few more or less unpredictable weirdos, I would say that the solutions I receive are practically never, never, never, anything.
You shouldn't say that, there is a logic, there is a construction, very, very well thought out things, simply, there is, I would say, an error on...so I am using a word that should not be overinterpret, I was going to say there is an error on the benchmarks, I'm not talking about the benchmarks, this, something, on the ground, I'm talking broadly about hunting, there are a certain number of directions to take , direction to take, things to trace, to find,... there are some, there are a certain number of players who do not have the same vision of things but overall, the reasoning is extremely constructed and very well done.
It's not just anything.
(Q - edmond Dantès: I agree, I don't think I said that the reasoning was nonsense, on the contrary these reasonings led me to the sentinels, we will say and therefore I did things that allowed me to obtain this word,...well, it's complicated to go further...)
MB : how did you tell me, the Sentinels spoke to you, right?
(Q - Edmond Dantès: absolutely, the numbers clearly indicated to me things which indicated to me things which allowed me to discover a word, come on, let's be clear, that's it. .)
MB : okay, so what is the question? Should I say bravo, that's good, are you right or what?
(Q - Edmond Dantès: my question is I am at the Sentinelles, I untied the threads, these threads allowed me to obtain a word, let's say, it's quite precise same and my question is, am I already in the change of gear and do I continue in this direction or is it a derivative of what I have just done which will give me allow you to find the Super Solution, to understand the last one...)
MB : no, no there is no derivative, when we are in the change of gear we are in another... we change register of way of thinking, of considering the thing but once we are inside, we are inside, there is no need to take up other arrangements or anything. No, no, we're going back..
You are in a very homogeneous stage, you enter into a logic, into a way of considering the thing which is different from what you did in the previous puzzles, but which constitute a whole, once you are in it you stay there and you go to the end.