MB : When we talk about passage keys, it can tell us that 2 puzzles work in relation to elements of the previous puzzle, 2 out of the 11 where we need the previous puzzle, all the others are independent..
.
(Q - nlc: except perhaps an element which comes from an even earlier enigma such as measurement, because we potentially find it at the beginning and can be used again when we need it )
MB : Wait, we're talking about passage keys, I'll come back to my lenses -> salt or not...once we understand it's good....we won't use any more. If we have adopted 1, 2 or 3 measures we get by but it is not a key to passage, it is an achievement in the history of enigmas... it arrives at a level of conivance, of confidentiality, of intimacy, people reveal their feelings, he is very disturbed because the players are saddened, lost, it is poignant because given the energy deployed upstream, the efforts, he does not want to play with that. He's coming this evening to clarify things. This notion that he communicates to us is that we must, under no circumstances, systematize any process whatsoever in the course of the hunt. We have 11 puzzles, 2 need "pass key", elements that come from the previous puzzle, it doesn't go any further. In the book when it was written "each riddle is a key..." it's literary...it's literature, obviously one riddle allows you to follow on to the other, if we have the right starting point, otherwise we don't get off on the right foot, that's understandable....
(Q - ?? just to clarify -> mixing pass keys and links)
(Q -nlc: the path, the resolution of the puzzles can be independent of the previous one but with the right starting point it comes together)
MB : There you go, but only 2 which cannot be solved without repeating an element from the previous one...
(Q - ?? Are there any links or are we forgetting?)
MB : No links between the puzzles, there are none! Both are essential, they need elements of the previous enigma, it is used to decipher the next one and it is essential.
He's not here to lose us, gives precise information. No patented system that would allow one puzzle to be linked to another. The right order -> not complex, then understand how they come together.
(Q - flo: [didn't really understand the question])
MB : for you it is a godsend that I tell you that 2 riddles require an element deciphered in the previous one, I cannot answer riddle by riddle. I try to provide information without harming anyone. There are no other passage keys, no links whatsoever, except a logical sequence, a classified sequence that you must decipher fairly quickly I think.
(Q - ??: These 2 elements are in the book of solutions, explained by Max, isn't that something you deduced?)
MB : But don't take me for an idiot, I'm telling you things, I'm not an idiot. It amuses me to read that I didn't follow the path, that I didn't trace 3, 4, 5, 6, I don't know how many lines on the map so I can't understand. Don't take me for stupider than I am, I understood all that very well, through the messages he received he perfectly understood your questions, annoyances, weariness, ... What I'm trying to I can tell you that I understood all that perfectly, the mechanics of the game 100%, in fact we can create a problem when someone asks me a specific question about a sequence of an enigma, but I understand everything you tell me. He realizes that he has been brewing things that have been encysted for years, it hurts, but the abscess must be burst. Everything I tell you is true, precise and understood, so [mic cut]
(Q - nlc: except perhaps an element which comes from an even earlier enigma such as measurement, because we potentially find it at the beginning and can be used again when we need it )
MB : Wait, we're talking about passage keys, I'll come back to my lenses -> salt or not...once we understand it's good....we won't use any more. If we have adopted 1, 2 or 3 measures we get by but it is not a key to passage, it is an achievement in the history of enigmas... it arrives at a level of conivance, of confidentiality, of intimacy, people reveal their feelings, he is very disturbed because the players are saddened, lost, it is poignant because given the energy deployed upstream, the efforts, he does not want to play with that. He's coming this evening to clarify things. This notion that he communicates to us is that we must, under no circumstances, systematize any process whatsoever in the course of the hunt. We have 11 puzzles, 2 need "pass key", elements that come from the previous puzzle, it doesn't go any further. In the book when it was written "each riddle is a key..." it's literary...it's literature, obviously one riddle allows you to follow on to the other, if we have the right starting point, otherwise we don't get off on the right foot, that's understandable....
(Q - ?? just to clarify -> mixing pass keys and links)
(Q -nlc: the path, the resolution of the puzzles can be independent of the previous one but with the right starting point it comes together)
MB : There you go, but only 2 which cannot be solved without repeating an element from the previous one...
(Q - ?? Are there any links or are we forgetting?)
MB : No links between the puzzles, there are none! Both are essential, they need elements of the previous enigma, it is used to decipher the next one and it is essential.
He's not here to lose us, gives precise information. No patented system that would allow one puzzle to be linked to another. The right order -> not complex, then understand how they come together.
(Q - flo: [didn't really understand the question])
MB : for you it is a godsend that I tell you that 2 riddles require an element deciphered in the previous one, I cannot answer riddle by riddle. I try to provide information without harming anyone. There are no other passage keys, no links whatsoever, except a logical sequence, a classified sequence that you must decipher fairly quickly I think.
(Q - ??: These 2 elements are in the book of solutions, explained by Max, isn't that something you deduced?)
MB : But don't take me for an idiot, I'm telling you things, I'm not an idiot. It amuses me to read that I didn't follow the path, that I didn't trace 3, 4, 5, 6, I don't know how many lines on the map so I can't understand. Don't take me for stupider than I am, I understood all that very well, through the messages he received he perfectly understood your questions, annoyances, weariness, ... What I'm trying to I can tell you that I understood all that perfectly, the mechanics of the game 100%, in fact we can create a problem when someone asks me a specific question about a sequence of an enigma, but I understand everything you tell me. He realizes that he has been brewing things that have been encysted for years, it hurts, but the abscess must be burst. Everything I tell you is true, precise and understood, so [mic cut]