(Q - flo: I admit to being cautious about your answers on the 4-center spiral in the conference and to tell us that you didn't actually say anything?)
MB : I will answer you but I would like to know the question I am being asked. what do you mean by circumspect?
(Q - flo: by that I mean that in the first part of the answer, the choice of words suggests that it must be traced, then in the second part that it must be found and so I don't really know which foot to dance on, that's the meaning of the word circumspect)
MB : I won't answer you on this point, don't count on it. On the other hand, what I am very clear about is that if we define a line, well that is my understanding, forgive me I am not a great mathematician, but when I hear we define a line and that we're talking about a spiral that we want to attach to this line, even if it's an orthogonal one, I can't imagine that a spiral is entirely inscribed on a line, there you have to explain it to me. So if someone explains it to me I could perhaps answer but I don't understand this concept.
(Q - flo: okay, my understanding of madit is if we find it on the ground, its representation on the map is a point which itself is on the right, in this sense the spiral is entirely on the right)
MB : okay but that's not written.
(Q - flo: I was referring to the madit)
MB : but this is not specified, we do not say on the scale of a point on the map, that is not what is said in the madit. It's good that you asked me this question, I saw you coming a little. At the time of the conference, it was heavy, he felt a certain form of guilt, by demolishing their game...Since then, I have recovered a little, I come back to your question and I answer the following: among the madits for some reason that he doesn't know, and it hits his brain, there are madits who are totally off the mark and who really go against what should have been answered....Maybe- maybe some people responded in place of Max Valentin, nevertheless my position is very clear -> spiral on a straight line I don't understand and I add that according to my common sense, some said are false....so my reaction is this following: in relation to that, he cannot invalidate curses piecemeal because that would be giving clues, so it is better to take all of this with a grain of salt, it is better to do without it. I feel that I have made a bit of a mess in the story but at the same time I fully accept and what I object to is this mechanism which has been triggered, sneakily, which consists of say that ""well Becker he uses other words than Max but it means the same thing -> no it doesn't mean the same thing. So I stand by everything he said during the conference, I have just answered you about the madits, to give you the exact reason for my motivation, there are madits which in my opinion are false and I say it is necessary don't go too far on the curses. I fully take responsibility for what I say. after the concepts mentioned which he demolishes, they must be demolished because there is nothing systematic about them.
MB : I will answer you but I would like to know the question I am being asked. what do you mean by circumspect?
(Q - flo: by that I mean that in the first part of the answer, the choice of words suggests that it must be traced, then in the second part that it must be found and so I don't really know which foot to dance on, that's the meaning of the word circumspect)
MB : I won't answer you on this point, don't count on it. On the other hand, what I am very clear about is that if we define a line, well that is my understanding, forgive me I am not a great mathematician, but when I hear we define a line and that we're talking about a spiral that we want to attach to this line, even if it's an orthogonal one, I can't imagine that a spiral is entirely inscribed on a line, there you have to explain it to me. So if someone explains it to me I could perhaps answer but I don't understand this concept.
(Q - flo: okay, my understanding of madit is if we find it on the ground, its representation on the map is a point which itself is on the right, in this sense the spiral is entirely on the right)
MB : okay but that's not written.
(Q - flo: I was referring to the madit)
MB : but this is not specified, we do not say on the scale of a point on the map, that is not what is said in the madit. It's good that you asked me this question, I saw you coming a little. At the time of the conference, it was heavy, he felt a certain form of guilt, by demolishing their game...Since then, I have recovered a little, I come back to your question and I answer the following: among the madits for some reason that he doesn't know, and it hits his brain, there are madits who are totally off the mark and who really go against what should have been answered....Maybe- maybe some people responded in place of Max Valentin, nevertheless my position is very clear -> spiral on a straight line I don't understand and I add that according to my common sense, some said are false....so my reaction is this following: in relation to that, he cannot invalidate curses piecemeal because that would be giving clues, so it is better to take all of this with a grain of salt, it is better to do without it. I feel that I have made a bit of a mess in the story but at the same time I fully accept and what I object to is this mechanism which has been triggered, sneakily, which consists of say that ""well Becker he uses other words than Max but it means the same thing -> no it doesn't mean the same thing. So I stand by everything he said during the conference, I have just answered you about the madits, to give you the exact reason for my motivation, there are madits which in my opinion are false and I say it is necessary don't go too far on the curses. I fully take responsibility for what I say. after the concepts mentioned which he demolishes, they must be demolished because there is nothing systematic about them.